Friday, March 4, 2011

An application for a late birth certificate that has not been accepted by the 'state registrar of Hawaii'



Nne aspect of the image that is clearly questionable is the obliteration of the Certificate No. That number is a tracking number that would allow anyone to ask the question, "Does this number refer to the Certification of Live Birth for the child Barack Hussein Obama II?" It would not reveal any further personal information; therefore, there would be no justifiable reason for obliterating it.

Obama’s alleged ‘Certification of Live Birth’ shows only the ‘Date Filed by Registrar’. Hawaii doesn't issue any 'certification of live birth certificates' that indicate ‘Date Filed by Registrar’.

The story really does begin here.

Two terms have plagued the Obama birth certificate issue from the beginning and have fueled many questions about Obama’s posted alleged ‘certified copy’ of a ‘Certification of Live Birth.’ For example, what do they mean in terms of the legal veracity behind a copy of a birth certificate? What is the difference between the “Registrar” and the “State Registrar?”

When would it be important that a record states whether or not it has been accepted by the State Registrar? Obama’s alleged ‘Certification of Live Birth’ shows only the ‘Date Filed by Registrar’ as opposed to the ‘Date Accepted by State Registrar,’ that’s why many people, including myself, have been curious whether that matters.

By now, I am sure most of us are aware that Alvin T. Onaka is the ‘State Registrar’ in Hawaii, but who is the ‘Registrar’ to which Obama’s alleged COLB refers?

The difference in these terms is crucial.

It is not a “valid” record until it has been accepted and filed by the ‘State Registrar.’ Furthermore, the ‘State Registrar’s’ certification attests to the evidentiary value of ‘Date of Birth,’ ‘Parentage’ and ‘Place of Birth.’ So, until the ‘State Registrar’ accepts and takes custody of the record, it is only a non-valid ‘application’ for a ‘Late Birth Certificate’ in procedural limbo, so to speak, and in the custody of the ‘Registrar.’

(The certification of live birth the DNC and obama used to prove his US citizenship is only a non-valid ‘application’ for a ‘Late Birth Certificate’ because it is not a "valid" record that has been accepted and filed by the 'state registrar of Hawaii'.

Obama has presented to the world a ‘Late Birth Certificate’ in procedural limbo that is in the custody of the 'registrar'.

Until it has been accepted for filing by the ‘State Registrar:’ is is ONLY a non-valid 'application for a ‘Late Birth Certificate’.


This is the so called "vital records" on file in the state of Hawaii.

An application for a late birth certificate that has not been accepted by the 'state registrar of Hawaii'.) Story Reports

On October 31, 2008 – five days before the 2008 Presidential election – Dr. Fukino put out a press release and according to Factcheck.org, she was quoted as stating that both she and “Alvin Onaka, have personally verified that the health department holds Obama’s original birth certificate.” We all know that Onaka is the ‘State Registrar,’ so that settles it – Hawaii’s ‘State Registrar’ must have custody of the record, right?

Besides, many gorgeous news organizations apparently reported the same thing. So, they all must be correct, right? And, we’ve all seen Dr. Fukino’s statement, by now, and that’s what she said, right? Dr. Fukino said that the State Registrar had verified with her that the HDOH had Obama’s original birth certificate on record and that he, as State Registrar, had the statutory authority to maintain and oversee the record – so he is the custodian of that record and the record is valid and official, right?

Right?

RIGHT?

Nope.

Believe it or not, on October 31, 2008, Dr. Fukino actually stated that THIS individual had “statutory authority” to maintain and oversee Obama’s “original birth certificate,” and that this individual was THE legal custodian of Obama’s “original birth certificate” just FIVE days before the 2008 U.S. Presidential election:...

Obama's Garden dedicated to digging up the truth about obama's true origin

Dr. Fukino stated, this person, had it on record “in accordance with state policies and procedures.”

Not in accordance with regulations. Not in accordance with law:

That’s right. Incredibly, just five days before the election, Obama’s “original birth certificate” was NOT “valid” or in the custody of the ‘State Registrar,’ Dr. Fukino, herself, said it was in the custody of the “Registrar.”

And if the “Registrar” had custody of the record, Alvin T. Onaka would not and could not certify a copy of it with his signature.

So, now we have our answer. We know whether or not “Date Filed by Registrar” matters. It matters. A lot. Because Dr. Fukino said that the “original birth certificate” was in the “Registrar’s” custody. It was still in the procedural stage. And because someone other than the Hawaii State Registrar was custodian of Obama’s original birth certificate on October 31, 2008, we know that Obama did not have a valid original birth certificate and he possibly had an application for a ‘Late Birth Certificate’ on file that was pending acceptance by the State Registrar….or perhaps he had a record that had been rejected by the State Registrar entirely.

And if it was not in the State Registrar’s custody and under his authority, then his “original birth certificate” was not evidence to “date and place of birth and parentage.”

The Hawaii State Registrar did not have the legal authority to maintain and oversee Obama’s original birth certificate just five days before the presidential election.

Barrack Obama did not have the valid original birth certificate that he and ‘his people’ have claimed he had and Dr. Fukino said so.

It means that Dr. Fukino said Barrack Obama, his people, our Congress and the media are all LIARS.

So, thank you, Dr. Fukino, for speaking up – twice. Thank you for not letting this go unsaid and thank you for putting it on the public record so that we can prove our Congress failed us so completely…if only in hindsight.

The nation owes you much gratitude for giving us a chance to open our eyes before the election even if most of us missed it.

(I had noticed the online fake certification of live birth indicated date filed by registrar and also noticed it did not indicate date accepted by registrar.

You have made it clear now that the online colb is just an application for a delayed birth certificate that was not accepted before the DNC declared obama was a US citizen/natural born citizen to get him on the presidential ballot in Hawaii in 2008.

An application for a birth certificate is not legal evidence of birth in the US.

This is why obama hides his true identity and spends millions in court to keep his origin from being probated.

Thank you for your excellent work Miss Tickly!) Story Reports

The Story of the Century

Compare a real certification of live birth with obama's fake certification of live birth

Obama could be called the "father of the lie"

Friday’s government report that the unemployment (U.3) rate fell last month from 9.4 percent to 9.0 percent? How could the rate decrease when January only saw a reported increase in payroll employment of 36,000 jobs when some 150,000 new jobs are needed to be created each month just to stay even with population growth?

According to Friday’s, Feb 4, Bureau of Labor Statistics report, a 0.4 percentage point decline in the unemployment rate means “the number of unemployed persons decreased by about 600,000.” Where did the other 564,000 January jobs come from as they cannot be found in the reported jobs data?

The jobs are phantom jobs created by faulty seasonal adjustments.

In other words, the 564,000 people are, in reality, unemployed and are not employed in the non-existent seasonally-adjusted jobs that the government added to the numbers.

It’s Bureau of Labor Statistics magic. Unemployment rose, but the unemployment rate fell.

Using this government ploy, theoretically, the U.S. could have a zero unemployment rate while the entire population is out of work!

Even the measly 36,000 job gain is an illusion created by the faulty “birth-death” model, which guesses that new startups add more jobs each month than business failures subtract. This might sometimes be true, but not during an economic downturn. Without the jobs added by this faulty estimating technique, “the reported January 2011 payroll gain of 36,000 would have been a decline of 52,000!”

The BLS “birth-death” model’s over-estimate of payroll jobs results in quiet annual revisions in the number of employed. In Friday’s employment report, largely unnoticed by the financial press, the BLS reports in its benchmark revision that there were 483,000 fewer people employed in December 2010 than previously reported.

The U.3 unemployment rate is the headline rate. It receives all the media attention, because it only measures 40 percent of the unemployed, thus making the recession look smaller than it really is. No discouraged workers who have given up looking for work are included. The government has a more complete measure of the unemployment rate known as U.6, which includes the short term discouraged (less than one year). That rate is16.1 percent.

The long term discouraged brings the true rate of unemployment to 22.2 percent. This is the REAL UNEMPLOYMENT RATE.

While the BLS was reporting unemployment in February 2011 was only 8.9 percent, the BLS also was reporting U6 unemployment in February 2011 at 16.7 percent.

The only measure BLS reports to the public as the official monthly unemployment rate is the seasonally adjusted U3 number.

The seasonally adjusted U3 numbers reported by the BLS as the official monthly unemployment rate do not give a reliable picture of the true magnitude of unemployment in the United States.

The monthly unemployment rate report turned out by the BLS defines unemployment as those currently without a job who have actively looked for work in the prior 4 weeks, and are currently available for work.

This definition excludes from the definition of unemployed those who have grown so discouraged that they are only marginally looking for work, as well as those who are considered underemployed because they have been forced to accept part-time or lower paying full-time employment because no other jobs are available.

The seasonally adjusted U3 unemployment rate dropped from 9.4 percent in December 2010 to 8.9 in February 2011, the non-adjusted U3 unemployment rate is moving in the opposite direction, from 9.1 percent in December 2010 to 9.5 percent in February 2011.

(Obama spits out his unemployment statistics lie and using the state run media propaganda machine, informs Americans that the unemployment rate is improving.

It is a lie. The numbers include non-existent seasonally-adjusted jobs that don't exist. The 564,000 people are, in reality, unemployed and are not employed in the non-existent seasonally-adjusted jobs that the government added to the numbers.

Even the measly 36,000 job gain is an illusion created by the faulty “birth-death” model, which guesses that new startups add more jobs each month than business failures subtract.

Obama could be called the "father of the lie" because every distorted or deceptive word that comes out of obama's mouth is conceived to deceive.

Obama himself is illegitimate. He was conceived by a lie. His birth origin just like the non-existent jobs are an illusion.)
Story Reports

Fed documents reveal 22.1% unemployment

The Official Gov. Lie about Unemployment

Shadow Government Statistics Analysis Behind and Beyond Government Economic Reporting

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

How to make a dummy


Dummies are often made to look like small boys and feature a limp body with a fully articulated head.

Making ventriloquist dummies is a complex art, requiring a good deal of skill. The internal structure of the dummy's head is made up of a network of wires and pulleys. These are manipulated by the ventriloquist to bring the dummy to life, moving his eyes, eyebrows, jaw, and sometimes even ears or tongue. If you already are familiar with the construction of plastic, resin, or papier-mâché dummies, however, making a wooden dummy isn't all that difficult.

Instructions

Draw patterns for the dummy's head. You will need both profile and full-face patterns for best results. Draw large rectangles over the profile pattern to determine the size and position of the wood blocks from which you'll carve the head. The head will need to be made of four main blocks---the face, the forward-middle head, the rear-middle head, and the back of the head---as well as a small block for the nose.

Cut wood blocks to the sizes you have determined and glue them together in the positions marked on your pattern. Rather than gluing the wood pieces directly to each other, put a piece of paper between the wood at each connection: This will allow you to take the head apart later. Only the nose should be glued normally, at this point, since you won't have to remove it later. Trace the patterns onto the rough block-head with carbon paper placed under your drawing.

Carve the rough shape of the head with the gouges, removing large chunks of wood until the dummy's head is nearly down to the size desired. Use the bench knife to add detail and finish the carving process. Smooth the head with sandpaper until it looks exactly as you want it.

Break the pieces of the head apart with a chisel and use the gouges to hollow out the inside for the dummy's mechanism. Do this very carefully; you want to make the cavity as large as possible without accidentally puncturing the wall of the head. The head should be approximately half an inch thick at all points.

Cut the dummy's jaw out with the scroll saw so that it can freely articulate. Cut holes for the eyes. You may need to cut other apertures as well, depending on what you want the dummy to be able to do. Install the internal mechanism of the head and connect everything so that the dummy's face is fully functional. Glue the head together, paint it if desired, and give it a coat of varnish.

Finish the dummy. Carve a torso from a large block of wood to hide your hand while operating it and to give the body some definition. Since this will be covered by the dummy's clothes, it needn't be nearly as detailed as the head. Simply give it a chest cavity and shoulders. Sew clothes, add a wig, and make stuffed cloth hands and arms for the dummy.

(Observing the above finished "dummy" it seems it is self manipulated because letterman's hand is not completely hidden.) Story Reports

Sunday, February 27, 2011

7 FAM 1113 NOT INCLUDED IN THE MEANING OF "IN THE UNITED STATES"

U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual Volume 7 - Consular Affairs

7 FAM 1113 NOT INCLUDED IN THE MEANING OF "IN THE UNITED STATES"

c. Birth on U.S. Military Base Outside of the United States or Birth on U.S. Embassy or Consulate Premises Abroad:

(1) Despite widespread popular belief, U.S. military installations abroad and U.S. diplomatic or consular facilities abroad are not part of the United States within the meaning of the 14th Amendment. A child born on the premises of such a facility is not born in the United States and does not acquire U.S. citizenship by reason of birth.

7 FAM 1112 WHAT IS BIRTH “IN THE UNITED STATES”?

a. INA 101(a)(38) (8 U.S.C. 1101 (a)(38)) provides that “the term ‘United States,’ when used in a geographical sense, means the continental United States, Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands of the United States.”

Outside of the country – the status of the land upon which a military base is located is governed by international treaty, law and what are known as Status of Forces agreements.

The citizenship acquired by birth on a military installation or consular facility is through the US Citizenship status of the parents. Also, any births to US citizen overseas must be registered with the consulate or authority on the base.

"U.S. military installations abroad and U.S. diplomatic or consular facilities abroad are not part of the United States within the meaning of the 14th Amendment."

A parent can only pass citizenship onto a child born on foreign soil if the parent in question has been a resident of the usa for at least ten years with those ten years not beginning before the age of sixteen.

(This means people born on military bases overseas are not considered born in the US. The citizenship of the parents determines the citizenship of person born on a US military base. Here it is in black and white.) Story Reports

U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual Volume 7 - Consular Affairs