____________________________________

ParrotNewsReport.com/cj (Citizen Journalist Blog)

ParrotNewsReport.com (All the news at at glance)


Saturday, February 19, 2011

Supreme Court will give obama eligibility case another look

Supreme Court will possibly ask "where's the birth certificate" on March 4.

The U.S. Supreme Court has scheduled another "conference" on a legal challenge to Barack Obama's eligibility to occupy the Oval Office, but officials there are not answering questions about whether two justices given their jobs by Obama will participate.

The court has confirmed that it has distributed a petition for rehearing in the case brought by attorney John Hemenway on behalf of retired Col. Gregory Hollister and it will be the subject of a conference on March 4.

In January the court denied, without comment, a request for a hearing on the arguments but the attorney at the time had submitted a motion for Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, who were given their jobs by Obama, to recuse.

The Supreme Court acknowledged the "motion for recusal" but it changed it on official docketing pages to a "request" and it reportedly failed to respond to the motion.

Attorney Hemenway:

"We have not exaggerated in presenting the question of the constitutional rule of law being at stake in this matter," Hemenway wrote in a petition for rehearing before the high court. "A man has successfully run for the office of president and has done so, it appears, with an awareness that he is not eligible under the constitutional requirement for a person to be president.

"Despite a vigorous campaign that he has conducted to make 'unthinkable' the very idea of raising the issue of his eligibility under the Constitution to 'be' president the issue has not gone away,".

"Instead it has steadily grown in the awareness of the public. Should we be surprised that he shows no respect for the constitutional rule of law? What else would we expect?"

"The real question here is one of getting members of the judiciary to take seriously the oath that they swore to protect and preserve the Constitution," Hemenway wrote in his petition for rehearing. "To continue to avoid the issue will destroy the constitutional rule of law basis of our legal system when it is under vigorous assault as surely as if the conscious decision were made to cease preserving and protecting our founding charter."

Hemenway's arguments came in the petition for rehearing that followed the decision last month by the court not to hear the arguments. However, he pointed out in the petition for rehearing that the U.S. Supreme Court appears to have broken its own rules in his case by failing to respond to a pending recusal motion.

That circumstance is enough, he argues, for another hearing to be held on the case, and this time without participation by the two justices appointed to the court by Obama.

"Rule 21 (4) of the court requires that any motion shall have an opposition to it filed, if one is to be filed, 'as promptly as possible considering the nature of the relief sought … and, in any event, within 10 days of receipt.' Thus by January 14, 2011, when petitioners' petition was denied without comment, the respondents had failed to respond to the motion," Hemenway wrote.

"Therefore, as a matter of due process of the court, petitioners suggest that the court should have on that day considered the possibility that the motion had been conceded by respondents with an examination of the consequences of that failure," the brief explains.

"If petitioners are entitled to have their motion for recusal as conceded because of lack of a timely opposition, as petitioners contend is the case, then the court was obliged to make sure that the Justices Sotomayor and Kagan did not participate in the decision. Yet there was no statement that they did not participate," the brief states.

The brief further argues that because of the lack of a response or acknowledgment by the court, the court should have considered "the law of nations on matters of citizenship such as the phrase in question here as placed in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, namely, the requirement that a president 'be' a 'natural born citizen.'"

The argument continued, "Thus, it would seem, with all due respect, that if the court is required to and does treat the petitioners' motion for recusal as conceded the court would be required to consider the intent of the Framers of the Constitution in choosing the Article II phrase 'natural born citizen.'

"That is, of course, assuming that the majority of its members still believe that the intent of the Framers is essential to the constitutional rule of law in this country," the filing said.

In the original petition to the high court, the pleadings noted that if Obama is not constitutionally eligible, it will create a crisis.

"If proven true, those allegations mean that every command by the respondent Obama and indeed every appointment by respondent Obama, including the appointment of members [Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor] of this and every other court, may be only de facto but not de jure [by right of law]," stated the pleading.

"Further, his signature on every law passed while he occupies the Oval Office is not valid if he is not constitutionally eligible to occupy that office de jure," it continued.

"Thus, it is not hyperbole to state that the entire rule of law based on the Constitution is at issue. Moreover, it would indicate that the respondent Obama ran for the office of president knowing that his eligibility was at the very least in question," it continued.

Elgin earlier confirmed that Hemenway, as the attorney of record, got the notice from the court that the certiorari petition was denied without comment. But he said there was nothing from the court on the motion for recusal.

The order on Jan. 18 from the high court simply listed case 10-678, Hollister, Gregory S. v. Soetoro, Barry, et al as "denied" with no explanation.

It appears from the court's documentation that Kagan and Sotomayor participated in the "conference," the meeting at which Supreme Court justices determine which cases they will take. On other cases there are notations that Kagan or Sotomayor did not participate, and the Hollister case is without any such reference.

Although proceedings are not public, it is believed that a case must earn four votes among the nine justices before it is heard.

"Scalia stated that it would be heard if I can get four people to hear it. He repeated, you need four for the argument.

The Supreme Court was considered to have a 4-4 conservative-liberal split, with one swing vote on most issues. On the conservative side generally was Chief Justice John Roberts, Justices Samuel Alito, Scalia and Thomas. Justice Anthony Kennedy often is the swing vote. The liberal side frequently included Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter and John Paul Stevens.

(All we need is four justices to agree to hear the case against the fraud obama. If it happens it will be the beginning of the end for the hoax called obama.) Story Reports

The answer is obama has no long for birth certificate.

Obama only has an index notation with his name and sex.

This index notation was generated in 2007 when his campaign request Hawaii make up a "birth certificate" out of thin air.

If you are a US citizen Mr obama, prove it.

Thursday, February 17, 2011

The tru dat truth about Obama's birth certificate


FactCheck.org, the Annenberg-funded website, published a web page entitled, "The truth about Obama's birth certificate."

The information on the annenberg page is a 100% lie.

FactCheck.org's Summary

1. "In June, the Obama campaign released a digitally scanned image of his birth certificate..."

This statement is false -- the campaign released a digitally scanned "Certification of Live Birth." The document presented on this website is not now and never has been a birth certificate, and FactCheck.org knows it. So why did they publish this lie?

2. "FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate."

This statement is also a lie -- the only people that have seen, touched, and examined Obama's birth certificate is Chiyome Leinaala Fuikino M.D., the Director of the Hawaii Department of Health, and the Registrar of Vital Statistics.

Fuikino wrote, "There have been numerous requests for Sen. Barack Hussein Obama’s official birth certificate. State law (Hawai'i Revised Statutes §338-18) prohibits the release of a certified birth certificate to persons who do not have a tangible interest in the vital record."

So your conclusion, "We conclude that..." is false, because your conclusions are based on a false premise -- that you have seen Obama's birth certificate -- you haven't, because the State of Hawaii won't release it. What do you think is going on in the 48 lawsuits against Obama. These suits are all trying to get to Obama's birth certificate and 48 times, judges have said, "I can't go for that, ohh, no, I can't go for that."

3. "Update, Nov. 1: The director of Hawaii’s Department of Health confirmed Oct. 31 that Obama was born in Honolulu."

Complete fabrication and bold-faced lie -- what Fuikino wrote was, "Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai'i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai'i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures."

Nowhere in that statement does it say Obama was born in Honolulu, and here is the complete statement: -- check it out yourself.

And, nowhere does FactCheck.org identify the militantly partisan website that released the "Certification of Live Birth" -- The Daily Kos -- one of the wackiest websites extant. This FACT alone makes this entire scenario suspicious, if not patently ridiculous.

FactCheck.org's Analysis

The title of the FactCheck.org web page is, "The truth about Obama's birth certificate," everything on the page is a bold-faced lie, because FactCheck.org has never, ever seen Obama's birth certificate and every image and reference on their page is to a Certification of Live Birth -- and they refer to it a "birth certificate" every time.

(Obama has never claimed the image of a "birth certificate" on the fackcheck website as his. Obama only claims he doesn't have time to go around with his birth certificate pasted on his forehead.) Story Reports

Hawaii is notorious for its issuance of COLB's.

FactCheck.org is funded by the Annenberg Foundation, who funded Obama's buddy, the unrepentant domestic terrorist Bill Ayers, who, in turn, hired Barack Obama. They represent themselves as unbiased and non-partisan. That, of course, is just another lie.

This "birth certificate" controversy is in addition to the fact that Obama is not a "natural born citizen." There's at least two reasons Obama shouldn't be in the Oval Office, election fraud and his constitutional ineligibility.

~Eowyn

Why Do Conservative Elites Avoid Obama Eligibility?

The GOP honchos, beginning with John McCain in 2008 and continuing to new House Speaker John Boehner, avoid it.

Conservative columnists and talking heads such as Glenn Beck and Bill O’Reilly not just avoid it, they go out of their way to mock those who don’t. The latter chickened out when he wasted a golden opportunity to ask Obama about his elusive long-form birth certificate (and other documents such as his kindergarten and college records) in their recent sit-down interview.

When even an Obama worshipper such as Chris “thrill-up-my-leg” Matthews calls on O to release his original long-form birth certificate, it grows ever more curious why conservative elites avoid it with that proverbial 10-foot pole. I don’t buy the excuse that it’s because they fear a civil war would result should the Fraud be found to be constitutionally ineligible for the presidency.

Among national talk radio hosts, only Rush Limbaugh and to a lesser extent Sean Hannity talk about it, which is most strange because, as WorldNetDaily publisher Joseph Farah points out, the Obama eligibility issue is not just all-important, it is a winning issue. Go figure!

Why eligibility is a winning issue by By Joseph Farah - WorldNetDaily – February 03, 2011

Barack Obama cannot be Trusted with Classified Information

Jake Tapper Asks Axelrod About Obama's Long Form Birth Certificate

During the course of questioning about the Obama administration's attacks on the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, ABC News White House Correspondent Jake Tapper brought up the issue of Barack Obama refusing to release his long form Hawaii birth certificate in an interview today with senior White House adviser David Axelrod.

Axelrod said that Obama's birth certificate "has been available to people."

When Tapper followed up by asking if the long form version (aka the original with more information than the shorter publicly released version) has been released, Axelrod ducked the question with this bizarre rejoinder, “the only people who want to keep things secret are folks who have something to hide.”

TAPPER: But what do you say to people who argue you are demonizing an organization for a charge that nobody knows if it's true or not?

AXELROD: Well I’m not demonizing the Chamber of Commerce. I’m simply suggesting to them that they disclose the source of the $75 million that they are spending in campaigns and put to rest, put to rest the questions that have been, that have been raised.

TAPPER: Isn't that like the whackjobs that tell the president he needs to show them his full long-form birth certificate so he can put to rest the questions that have been raised?

AXELROD: The president’s birth certificate has been available to people.

TAPPER: The long form?

AXELROD: Someone once in the course of this debate about whether we should have a law to force these organizations to disclose where they’re money is coming from in the campaigns, someone said, and I think they’re right – “the only people who want to keep things secret are folks who have something to hide.” If the Chamber doesn’t have anything to hide about these contributions, and I take them at their word that they don’t, then why not disclose? Why not let people see where their money is coming from?

(Axelrod knows the is no long for 'birth certificate' in Hawaii. There is only an index notation of obama's name and sex as documentation validating his US citizenship. In other words there is nothing in Hawaii that validates obama as a US citizen.

The question then becomes where was obama born? looking at the record of his mothers time in Washington state less than one month after obama was hatched it seems very possible obama was born in Washington state in 1961.

The question then becomes who sired obama?

The answer is probably his mentor frank marshall davis, a transexual.

This would help explain the freak know as barack obama.

Frank Marshall Davis was a good friend of Obama’s grandfather Stanley Armour Dunham.

Davis was designated by his buddy, Obama’s grandfather (referred to as “gramps” in Obama’s memoir), as a guide for the very young Barack to instruct him on how to be an African-American man.

What a strange choice Davis was! Even forgetting the Communism and the possible pedophilia; Obama presents Davis as a seedy and dissipated figure [excerpt is from Dreams From My Father]:

…by the time I met Frank [Obama was around nine years old] he must have been pushing eighty, with a big dewlapped face and an ill-kempt gray Afro that made him look like an old, shaggy-maned lion. He would read us his poetry whenever we stopped by his house, sharing whiskey with gramps out of an emptied jelly jar. As the night wore on, the two of them would solicit my help in composing dirty limericks. Eventually, the conservation would turn to laments about women.

“They’ll drive you to drink, boy,” Frank would tell me soberly. “And if you let ‘em, they’ll drive you into your grave.”

I was intrigued by the old Frank, with his books and whiskey breath and the hint of hard-earned knowledge behind the hooded eyes. The visits to his house always left me feeling vaguely uncomfortable, though, as if I were witnessing some complicated, unspoken transaction between the two men, a transaction I couldn’t fully understand….

The transaction obama says he didn't fully understand is probably his grandfather and marshall were more than 'just friends'.

How much Davis’s Communist ideology influenced Obama is unknown, and Obama isn’t telling.

But whatever the truth of Davis’s ideological influence on Obama, his relation to Obama was certainly profound in the psychological sense. The evidence for that is in Obama’s own words—and I’m not just talking about the prose in Dreams From My Father. Obama also wrote a poem in college called “Pop” that appears to be about Davis.

Some people have assumed this poem is about Obama’s grandfather because of the title, but there is little question in my mind that the subject is actually Davis. The description in the poem dovetails perfectly with the description in the book (poet, whiskey), and the black glasses at the end match of Davis giving a public reading.

It is quite a disturbing document on many levels:

frank marshall davis obama's mentor inspires obama to write a poem:

Sitting in his seat, a seat broad and broken

In, sprinkled with ashes

Pop switches channels, takes another

Shot of Seagrams, neat, and asks

What to do with me, a green young man

Who fails to consider the
Flim and flam of the world, since

Things have been easy for me; 

I stare hard at his face, a stare

That deflects off his brow; 

I’m sure he’s unaware of his

Dark, watery eyes, that

Glance in different directions,

And his slow, unwelcome twitches,

Fail to pass.
I listen, nod,

Listen, open, till I cling to his pale, 

Beige T-shirt, yelling,

Yelling in his ears, that hang

With heavy lobes, but he’s still telling
His joke, so I ask why
He’s so unhappy, to which he replies…

But I don’t care anymore, cause

He took too damn long, and from

Under my seat, I pull out the

Mirror I’ve been saving; I’m laughing, 

Laughing loud, the blood rushing from his face

To mine, as he grows small,

A spot in my brain, something

That may be squeezed out, like a 

Watermelon seed between

Two fingers.

Pop takes another shot, neat,

Points out the same amber

Stain on his shorts that I’ve got on mine, and

Makes me smell his smell, coming

From me; he switches channels, recites an old poem

He wrote before his mother died,

Stands, shouts, and asks

For a hug, as I shrink, my 

Arms barely reaching around

His thick, oily neck, and his broad back; ’cause

I see my face, framed within
Pop’s black-framed glasses

And know he’s laughing too.

The lines that begin “points out the same amber stain makes me smell his smell, coming/

From me” may be describing outright sexual abuse.

(Yep obama smelled his smell. Now America smells the smell of one barack hussein obama in the form of a pungent stinch that lingers and reminds us of something sick and pu·tre·fy·ing. The initials BO signify birth origin is yet to be determinded.) Story Reports

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Sixty Seven Million "Birthers" can't be wrong and ask, WHERE'S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE?


Astonishing number of citizens don't believe "president's" story of his origin
..........................................................................................
55 million are registered Republicans.

28 Million don't believe obama was born in the US. (Public Policy Polling)

42 million are registered as independents.

Maybe 15 million of these voters also don't believe obama was born in the US. (estimate)

This means there are at least 67 million "birthers" who think obama is a FRAUD.

The "state run media" would have you believe only "nuts" would question the origin of obama.

Origin is a better word than birth.

Sixty Seven Million ask the question: WHERE'S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE?

Sixty Seven Million get NO answer from obama except, "I can't go around with my birth certificate plasted on my head."

Obama told the truth probably for the first time when he made that stupid statement.

Evidence indicates obama has no long form birth certificate, only an index record notation in Hawaii with his name and sex.

Obama's lack of any records of any kind including his 'UN NATURAL BORN CITIZENSHIP' are only a SIDE SHOW to the main attraction which is he is NOT a US citizen or he could and would validate his origin.

Sixty Seven Million "birthers" can't be wrong.

Obama knows the first time a court requires his origin to be probated he will be forced to explain his origin. Obama lacks documentation of his origin an must hide this fact.

The usurper elected "president" CANNOT validate his US citizenship.

If obama could answer Sixty Seven Million people with a valid long form hospital generated birth certificate indicating the hospital and doctors name; he would validate his origin.

Now you know the rest of the story as Paul Harvey use to say.

Obama's whole history "smells' like something is rotten.

The rotten something is BO himself and his undocumented origin. Obama IS an ILLEGAL ALIEN.
.........................................................................................
Obama Continues His Campaign To make 'Unthinkable' The Issue Of His US Citizenship To Hide The Fact He Cannot Produce Valid Documentation Verifying His US Citizenship

(The reason obama has not released the long form is because it does not exist. I am an origin originator investigator, a dedicated "birther", that has determined, as others have, that obama has only an index notation as proof of his origin.

This index notation was generated around Jun 6, 2007 when obama requested a short form colb from Hawaii. Obama's birthday is Jun 6, 2007. This is the date his online colb was generated out of thin air. This explains why obama doesn't go around with his colb pasted on his forehead.

Obama's number one priority is to keep his origin anonymous. He must continue to hide any and all documentation about his origin. Origin is a better term for "obama" than birth because there is NO EVIDENCE than can be verified where "obama" was born.

It is a probable hypothesis that obama is the originator of his own online "certification of live birth". The fake online "certification" has a bleed through date of Jun 6, 2007. Why did obama use as proof of his US citizenship before Jun 6, 2007? If it was an original long form hospital generated "certificate of live birth" why did obama request a new "certification of live birth" from Hawaii that is only generated or requested for those who: don't have an original birth certifcate, or are born outside of Hawaii.

Jun 6, 2007 is a very important date. It seems it was the day obama faked his origin. It was the day he faked his "birth". Obama's "birthday" is Jun 6, 2007. Obama has NEVER claimed the online colb as his.

The "Certification of Live Birth" posted online and widely touted as "Obama's birth certificate" does not in any way prove he was born in Hawaii, since the same "short-form" document is easily obtainable for children not born in Hawaii.

The true "long-form" birth certificate – which includes information such as the name of the birth hospital and attending physician – is the only document that can prove Obama was born in Hawaii, but to date he has not permitted its release for public or press scrutiny.

(Thats because obama know he is "screwed" if that cat gets out of the bag he only has an index notation of his name and sex as documentation for his online certification of live birth that can't be validated.)

Other documentation not yet available for Obama, and will never be released, includes his kindergarten records, his Punahou school records, his Occidental College records, his Columbia University records, his Columbia thesis, his Harvard Law School records, his Harvard Law Review articles, his scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, his passport, his medical records, his files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and his adoption records.

Is the any reason for SIXTY SEVEN MILLION people NOT to believe obama is an ILLEGAL alien?

In other words there is NOTHING that validates obama's US citizenship. There are many people including Michael Reagan, Bill O'reilly and others who would tell you not to get into the minutiae of details that expose the UNCONSTITUTIOAL President obama. They want you to IGNORE THE FACT obama CANNOT VALIDATE HIS US CITIZENSHIP.

The nut cases that believe the origin of the universe was just a spontaneous burst of something from nothing are the same type of people who want you to believe obama's origin originated from a spontaneous notation in the index record in Hawaii.

Sunday, February 13, 2011

Obama exhibits the symptoms of a fraud


Nidal Hassan, the Fort Hood shooter was on Obama's Homeland Security Transition Team! An example of obama fraud.
.........................................................................................
The act of fraud is seldom observed. Symptoms and indicators of fraud are discoverable and observable. If symptoms of fraud are observed, many frauds can be detected at an early stage and either stopped or prevented. Fraud over time tends to grow larger and larger, so early detection is a preferable method to stop fraud.

Fraud symptoms include:

Inconsistent, vague or implausible responses or behaviour by an individual can represent fraud sysmptoms.

Lifestyle changes are often the easiest of all symptoms to detect. Although looking at bank records, investment records, and tax return information are difficult to access; property records, UCC filings, and other records are easy to check to determine whether there are assets that have been purchased or liens that have been removed. Unusual behavior is seen through an individual's recognizable behavior pattern to attempt to cope with the stress. Their guilt leads to fear, fear leads to stress, and stress leads to behavior changes.

Personal Characteristic Red Flags

Rationalization of contradictory behavior
Lack of a strong code of personal ethics
A wheeler-dealer personality
Lack of stability
A strong desire to beat the system
A criminal or questionable background

Characteristics of the Top-Management Fraud

(The following characteristics match obama almost exactly)

Tend to have highly material personal values.
Success to them means financial success, not professional recognition.
Tend to treat people as objects, not individuals and often as objects for exploitation.
Are highly self-centered.
Are often eccentric in the way they display their wealth or spend their money.
They tend to be conspicuous consumers and often boast of the things they have acquired, the friends they have in high office, and all the fine places they have visited.
Speak about their cunning achievements and winnings more than their losses.
Appear to be reckless or careless with facts and often enlarge on them.
Appear to be hard working, almost compulsive, but most of their time at work is spent scheming and designing short cuts to get ahead or beat the competition.
May gamble or drink a great deal.
Buy expensive gifts for their families usually to compensate for spending so little time with them.
Are hostile to people who oppose their views.
They feel exempt from accountability and controls because of their station or position.
Create a greet deal of turnover among their subordinates and often set off one subordinate against the other.
Play favorites among subordinates, but the relationship can cool very quickly because a subordinate often falls from grace after one mistake, even an insignificant one.
Manage by crisis more often than by objectives.

Demand absolute loyalty from subordinates, but they themselves are loyal only to their own self-interests.

Indicators of Possible Fraudulent Activities

Unsupported or unauthorized records, balances, or transactions.

Conflicting or Missing Evidential Matter or Missing documents. Unavailability of other than photocopied documents. Alterations on documents (e.g. back dating),Duplications, Questionable handwriting on documents. Denied access to records or facilities. Unusual delays in providing requested information. (Obama also matches this fraud profile.) Story Reports

Understanding Symptoms/Red Flags of Fraud

Understanding symptoms of fraud is the key to detecting fraud. A symptom of fraud may be defined as a condition which is directly attributable to dishonest or fraudulent activity. It may result from the fraud itself or from the attempt to conceal the fraud.

No proper documentation.

Lack of documentation.

(Fraud symptoms can be from the fraud itself or THE ATTEMPT TO CONCEAL THE FRAUD. Obama is a fraud who is daily attempting to conceal the fact he has committed fraud. His symtoms include NO proper documentation of his birth origin. Obama continues to refuse to disclose any documentation about his origin.) Story Reports

Obama continues to conceal the evidence of his birth origin. Obama refuses to release any documentation validating his online certification of live birth which he has never claimed was his own 'birth certificate'.

Obama knows the first time his fake colb is probated in a court of law he will be forced to validate his US citizenship.

This is what obama fears most because he cannot validate his US citizenship.

Obama has no documentation to back up his online jpeg as evidence of his US citizenship.

If obama did have ANY documentation that could be validated to prove he is a US citizen he would release it. He cannot because obama knows he is a fraud "president".

Where's the long form birth certificate from a hospital in Hawaii mr obama?

There is NO long form birth certificate from a hospital in Hawaii.

Obama only has an index notation of his name and sex.

This is obama's only documentation of his US citizenship and it can't be validated by anyone.

More information is needed such as hospital name, doctors name, parents signatures, doctors signature, registrar signature etc.

Obama is a no record or zero

I want to know where's the birth certificate


There is NOTHING that validates obama's US citizenship

Bill O'Reilly slammed the "birther" story Monday night, 07-27-09, on his show, saying that he had investigated the theory last year and debunked it.

But although he questioned why CNN's Lou Dobbs was still discussing the theory on the air, O'Reilly disagreed with those who would like to see Dobbs kicked off the air, defending his free speech rights in a spirited discussion with the Southern Poverty Law Center's president Richard Cohen.

In his "Talking Points Memo" segment, O'Reilly said:

"That theory has been around for a while. The Factor investigated, found out it's bogus. But Mr. Dobbs is still engaged...

Again, we found out that President Obama was born in Hawaii.. we were sent the documents. And what are you gonna do? I don't know why it's still around..."

(Bill O'Reilly has "the documents" the Governor of Hawaii abercrombie was searching to prove obama was born in Hawaii.

O'reilly says he was "sent the documents". He asks the question, "And what are you gonna do?"

The question is, what are you gonna do o'reilly? Will you help governor abercrombie in his quest to find the "missing documents" he an all of America want to see?

How can you get documentation from Hawaii when no one else in America can including the governor of Hawaii?

Does your documentation include a simple index record notation?

The index data regarding President Obama is:

Birth Index
Obama II, Barack Hussein
Male

Hawaii "vital records"

This information is open to the public but it only indicates obama applied for a birth certificate in 2007. The online colb is the only thing the obama campaign, not obama, has claimed as evidence he is a US citizen.

Does your documentation include a newspaper birth announcement that has an address where obama's "parents" NEVER lived but where his "grandparents" lived? The birth announcement is bogus.

There is no evidence obama's "parents" EVER lived togeather in Hawaii, NONE.

What are you documents mr o'reilly?

If you have any "documents" that proves obama is not an illegal alien why don't you give them to the public and the governor of Hawaii?

Did you get the factcheck "documents". If that is what you are referring to you don't have any evidence obama is a US citizen that can be verified. A certification of live birth cannot be verified with NO hospital name, No doctors name, No doctors,parents or registrar signatures.

You mr o'reilly are helping to coverup obama's true origin just like Hawaii, factcheck, obama and all the other media that can not prove obama is a valid US citizen.

All you can do is indicate you have documents or like the state of Hawaii, has seen the vital documents.

All spin from Mr o'reilly in the "no spin zone".

I want to know where's the birth certificate?

I'm talking about a long form hospital generated certificate of live birth that contains the hospital name, doctors name, parents names, registrar name and signatures.

I want to see an actual birth certificate from Hawaii for obama that CAN be verified with more that just the spin of a press release or a verbal announcement.) Story Reports

There is NOTHING that validates obama's US citizenship. No public records of any kind that can be used to valid obama's true origin. Obama is like a mannequin. At least a mannequin has a serial number.

There is NOTHING that validates obama's US citizenship