Saturday, March 26, 2011

Copy of email sent to U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Administrative Oversight and the Courts

This is an email I sent to all members of the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Administrative Oversight and the Courts. I can only hope these men have not been bought off by the obama administration.


The republican members are:

Jeff Sessions, Alabama (Ranking Member)
Chuck Grassley, Iowa
Michael S. Lee, Utah
Tom Coburn, Oklahoma

U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Administrative Oversight and the Courts

Judicial Watch in November 2010 filed a Freedom of Information Act request seeking records of communications between the Justice Department Civil Rights Division and the NAACP. Under federal requirements, Attorney General Eric Holder's agency was supposed to have responded by Dec. 3, 2010.

However, to date, no documents have been produced. Casual violations of the freedom of information law highlight this administration's contempt for transparency and the rule of law.

As of the date of this complaint, defendant has failed to produce any records responsive to the request or demonstrate that responsive records are exempt from production. Nor has it indicated whether or when any responsive records will be produced. In fact, defendant has failed to respond to the request in any manner.

DOJ attorney J. Christian Adams had been ordered by his superiors to drop a case prosecutors already had won against the New Black Panthers. When they were ordered to stop prosecution, Adams and the team of DOJ lawyers had already won the case by default because the New Black Panthers declined to defend themselves in court. At that point in the proceedings, the DOJ team was simply waiting for the judge to assign penalties against the New Black Panthers.

The Justice Department's decision to drop the case was tainted by politics and racism.

I need to know when the DOJ including Eric Holder will be investigated for obstruction of justice by your committee.

Holder ignores demands for NAACP-influence data

No comments: