Over 100 FREE Online Calculators

Friday, November 19, 2010

[S 510] would preclude the public’s right to grow, own, trade, transport, share, feed and eat each and every food that nature makes.

(Yes obama and his fellow devils in congress want to control what you eat and even grow in your back yard. Notice I'm not calling them Liberals or communists etc but I'm calling a spade a spade. There are DEVILS in congress that want the total destruction of you and the USA.) Story Reports

“If people let the government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny.”

~Thomas Jefferson, 1778

"There is No Right to Consume or Feed Children Any Particular Food; There is No Generalized Right to Bodily and Physical Health; There is No Fundamental Right to Freedom of Contract."
~US Dept of Health & Human Services and US Food & Drug Administration, 2010

[S 510] would preclude the public’s right to grow, own, trade, transport, share, feed and eat each and every food that nature makes.

S 510 is hissing in the grass

Senate bill S510 extends control over all food in the US, violating the fundamental human right to food. Senate Bill S510 Makes it illegal to Grow, Share, Trade or Sell Homegrown Food

S 510 would give Monsanto unlimited power over all US seed, food supplements, food and farming.


In the 1990s, Bill Clinton introduced HACCP (Hazardous Analysis Critical Control Points) purportedly to deal with contamination in the meat industry. Clinton’s HACCP delighted the offending corporate (World Trade Organization “WTO”) meat packers since it allowed them to inspect themselves, eliminated thousands of local food processors (with no history of contamination), and centralized meat into their control. Monsanto promoted HACCP.

In 2008, Hillary Clinton, urged a powerful centralized food safety agency as part of her campaign for president. Her advisor was Mark Penn, CEO of Burson Marsteller*, a giant PR firm representing Monsanto. Clinton lost, but Clinton friends such as Rosa DeLauro, whose husband’s firm lists Monsanto as a progressive client and globalization as an area of expertise, introduced early versions of S 510.

S 510 fails on moral, social, economic, political, constitutional, and human survival grounds.

1. It puts all US food and all US farms under Homeland Security and the Department of Defense, in the event of contamination or an ill-defined emergency. It resembles the Kissinger Plan.

2. It would end US sovereignty over its own food supply by insisting on compliance with the WTO, thus threatening national security. It would end the Uruguay Round Agreement Act of 1994, which put US sovereignty and US law under perfect protection. Instead, S 510 says:


Nothing in this Act (or an amendment made by this Act) shall be construed in a manner inconsistent with the agreement establishing the World Trade Organization or any other treaty or international agreement to which the United States is a party.

3. It would allow the government, under Maritime Law, to define the introduction of any food into commerce (even direct sales between individuals) as smuggling into “the United States.” Since under that law, the US is a corporate entity and not a location, “entry of food into the US” covers food produced anywhere within the land mass of this country and “entering into” it by virtue of being produced.

4. It imposes Codex Alimentarius on the US, a global system of control over food. It allows the United Nations (UN), World Health Organization (WHO), UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and the WTO to take control of every food on earth and remove access to natural food supplements. Its bizarre history and its expected impact in limiting access to adequate nutrition (while mandating GM food, GM animals, pesticides, hormones, irradiation of food, etc.) threatens all safe and organic food and health itself, since the world knows now it needs vitamins to survive, not just to treat illnesses.

5. It would remove the right to clean, store and thus own seed in the US, putting control of seeds in the hands of Monsanto and other multinationals, threatening US security. See Seeds – How to criminalize them, for more details.

6. It includes NAIS, an animal traceability program that threatens all small farmers and ranchers raising animals. The UN is participating through the WHO, FAO, WTO, and World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) in allowing mass slaughter of even heritage breeds of animals and without proof of disease. Biodiversity in farm animals is being wiped out to substitute genetically engineered animals on which corporations hold patents. Animal diseases can be falsely declared. S 510 includes the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), despite its corrupt involvement in the H1N1 scandal, which is now said to have been concocted by the corporations.

7. It extends a failed and destructive HACCP to all food, thus threatening to do to all local food production and farming what HACCP did to meat production – put it in corporate hands and worsen food safety.

8. It deconstructs what is left of the American economy. It takes agriculture and food, which are the cornerstone of all economies, out of the hands of the citizenry, and puts them under the total control of multinational corporations influencing the UN, WHO, FAO and WTO, with HHS, and CDC, acting as agents, with Homeland Security as the enforcer. The chance to rebuild the economy based on farming, ranching, gardens, food production, natural health, and all the jobs, tools and connected occupations would be eliminated.

9. It would allow the government to mandate antibiotics, hormones, slaughterhouse waste, pesticides and GMOs. This would industrialize every farm in the US, eliminate local organic farming, greatly increase global warming from increased use of oil-based products and long-distance delivery of foods, and make food even more unsafe. The five items listed — the Five Pillars of Food Safety — are precisely the items in the food supply which are the primary source of its danger.

10. It uses food crimes as the entry into police state power and control. The bill postpones defining all the regulations to be imposed; postpones defining crimes to be punished, postpones defining penalties to be applied. It removes fundamental constitutional protections from all citizens in the country, making them subject to a corporate tribunal with unlimited power and penalties, and without judicial review. It is (similar to C-6 in Canada) the end of Rule of Law in the US.

(S510 is similar to obamacare in that it does not define the regulations to be imposed until later. It just what pelosi said about obamacare. Pelosi said it would needed to be passed first before America would know what was in the bill. The devils in congress are passing open ended laws that can be modified at a later date without knowing or caring what they are voting for. The blind leading the blind into oblivion.) Story Reports

Senate Bill S510 Makes it illegal to Grow, Share, Trade or Sell Homegrown Food

Thursday, November 18, 2010

Almost Any Convicted Criminal Could Become A TSA Security Screener

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Regulations TITLE 14 CHAPTER I PART 108 Sec. 108.33 Employment history, verification and criminal history records checks

Requirements for Airport Security Screeners

Criminal History

Surprisingly, a conviction for a crime, even a violent felony, does not disqualify someone from working as a screener. FAR 108.33(2) states that a criminal records check must not disclose that the applicant had been convicted or found not guilty by reason of insanity, in any jurisdiction, during the previous 10 years of a number of crimes such as aircraft piracy, interference with a flight crew or cabin crew member, assault with intent to murder, rape or aggravated sexual abuse, or armed robbery.

This list of crimes includes sedition, treason, extortion, or distribution of a controlled substance.

This regulation implies that so long as the conviction were at least 10 years old, almost any convicted criminal could become a security screener.

Criminal Background Checks

FAR 108.33(c)(5) does not require criminal records checks for every screener applicant, only for those applicants who have specific deficiencies in their employment history, if there are other deficiencies in the application, or if the air carrier finds out that the applicant may have been convicted of certain kinds of crimes.

The required criminal records check is with the FBI, but the regulations do not say anything about records checks from other countries.

Educational Background

FAR 108.31(a)(1) requires that screeners possess a high school diploma, a General Equivalency Diploma, or a combination of education and experience which the certificate holder has determined to have equipped the person to perform the duties of the position.

This implies that the airline can decide that a screener does not have to successfully complete high school.

(Lets review the TSA regulations about how almost any convicted criminal could become a kabuki screener.

(1) Does not necessarily need to complete high school.

(2) The TSA screener can be employed if he or she has been convicted of:

Has been convicted or found not guilty by reason of insanity.

Aircraft piracy, ie hijacking an airplane!

Assault with intent to murder.

Rape or aggravated sexual abuse.

Armed robbery.




Distribution of a controlled substance, ie selling crack etc!

People are talking about TSA screeners groping people and feeling them up.

People need to also be aware that its possible that the TSA screener that is doing the groping could also be a COVICTED CRIMINAL!!!!!!!!

I think the fact that the TSA screener could be a convicted criminal that has committed one of the above crimes and is given a free pass by their employer is what the American public should be rasing hell about!

Its not just the groping its the criminal groper also! Obama TSA "kabuki security")

Story Reports

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Obama Is Pure Puff Or Facade With A Superficial Appearance Or Illusion Of Something

Barack Obama's amazingly consistent smile from Eric Spiegelman on Vimeo.

Barack Obama’s amazingly consistent smile

The grin is almost Chesire Cat-like, staying in a fixed position in every shot while the angle of the camera moves. The hands stay in exact position in relation to the body. The angle of the head doesn’t change over 130 frames, either. Either that’s a CARDBOARD CUTOUT, or like most politicians, Obama has learned to pose brilliantly, which is how he got elected President, after all.

Obama Is Pure Puff Or Facade With A Superficial Appearance Or Illusion Of Something

(He is like a guy who drives a polished car with expensive wheel rims but lives in a shack on welfare. Obama has projected a facade that has been appealing to some. Obama has carefully crafted himself as a facade to scam America.

On a film set and within most themed attractions, many of the buildings are only facades.In film sets, they are simply held up with supports from behind.

The term facade is the perfect description for barack hussein obama the IMPOSTER.

Obama projects the face or facade of a fake US citizen. He is held up by supporters from behind the scenes.

Obama is nothing more than a FAKE cardboard cutout.

Story Reports
Barack Obama: The Accidental Nominee How The Facade Of Obama Was Constructed

Barack Obama: The Accidental Nominee And How The FACADE Was Constructed

Just how did Barack Obama (D-IL), a rather undistinguished IL state senator, get elected to the U.S. Senate, and without doing anything noteworthy in that august body, go on to capture his party’s nomination for president before even finishing out his first term in Congress? A combination of heartlessness and happenstance - and some say, caucus fraud.

In 1996 Barack Obama ran unopposed in the Dem primary for the IL State Senate by challenging the signatures on the nominating petitions of all four of his rivals – including incumbent and party elder Alice Palmer – knocking them all off the ballot. As the Chicago Tribune explained: “Had Palmer survived the petition challenge, Obama would have faced the daunting task of taking on an incumbent senator.”

During his 2004 run for the U.S. Senate, Obama’s lucky streak started with his being able to exploit a provision of the 2002 Campaign Reform Act (AKA McCain-Feingold) that freed him from the law’s fundraising constraints. Obama’s extremely wealthy primary opponent, Blair Hull, self-financed his campaign to the tune of $28 million, triggering the “Millionaire’s Amendment” (struck down by the Supreme Court in June) so Obama’s donors were each allowed to contribute up to $12,000 to his campaign instead of being limited to $2,000. The Los Angeles Times reports:

A review of Obama’s receipts in 2003 and 2004 shows he raised $1.7 million in donations in excess of the maximum then in effect of $2,100, or roughly 28% of the $6 million he raised for the primary. Of that, $360,000 flowed in donations of the new maximum of $12,000, and $450,000 came in donations of $10,000. …

George Soros and at least four other members of his family each gave Obama $12,000 donations that year. Also, among those who gave $10,000 checks was a fellow with another now familiar name, Antoin ‘Tony’ Rezko.

With the money, Obama was able to buy TV ads statewide, as well as the services of one David Axelrod as his chief strategist and media advisor - his very own Karl Rove.

Blair had a healthy lead over Obama, as he was able to boost his name recognition by blanketing the airwaves with ads. A month before the primary elections – just as Obama’s ads were starting to air – a judge unsealed the records from his 1998 divorce (his ex-wife had sought a restraining order against him and he was arrested for battery after she alleged that he threatened to kill her; no charges were filed, however). Anyway, Hull dropped out and Obama ran for the Dem nomination unopposed.

An IL blogger who goes by the name Cao explains that Axelrod – who “railed against the politics of personal destruction” in the 1990s – had more than a little something to do with the unsealing of Hull’s divorce records and the subsequent leaks of salacious details to the media.

Lightning struck twice when Obama’s extremely wealthy Repub opponent, Jack Ryan, was forced to drop out of the race in June after a judge unsealed the records from his 1999 divorce and child custody battle with actress Jeri Ryan, despite both parents objecting to the child custody records being made public. The records included allegations – never proven - that Jack Ryan had taken his wife to sex clubs.

With less than three months before Election Day, Alan Keyes parachuted into IL to run in Ryan’s place. Obama beat him 70 percent to 27 percent.

Before Election Day 2004, while the Repubs were still in disarray, John Kerry asked Obama to give the keynote address at the party’s convention in July. Chicago Magazine reports that “Obama’s selection as keynote speaker was carefully plotted by all sides for maximum effect”:

Obama admitted in interviews at the time that he was “totally surprised” by the speaking invitation … As he put it in his book The Audacity of Hope: “The process by which I was selected as the keynote speaker remains something of a mystery to me.”

A closer look, however, reveals less mystery and more politics. …

It’s difficult to know what role Obama’s race played in getting the keynote slot … [A]t the time of the announcement, black leaders were criticizing Kerry for not doing enough to reach out to African American voters, whose support would be crucial to winning the presidency.

As for the speech itself, in an article titled, “The 17 Minutes That Launched a Political Star,”The Washington Post reports:

The first impression Obama crafted that night still forms the basis of his presidential campaign. In the most visible moment of his life to date, Obama discovered a formula for success in the public eye that he has relied on ever since. He prepared meticulously, but disguised his delivery as effortless. He told the story of his unique background, but offered few original ideas. …

Most of the concepts could have been plucked from any standard stump speech: that every child deserves a shot at a good life; that each American is connected - and responsible - for every other; that government needs to be honest with its people, especially before going to war. One conservative pundit, analyzing Obama’s speech later that night, would sum it up as “pure puff.”

The New York Times observed that “[t]he strange ritual of the Iowa caucuses, the fight over the Michigan and Florida delegations, the battle over the superdelegates - it has been a colorful nominating season, but not the most democratic one.” That’s an understatement.

What do you get when you combine lax caucus rules with bare-knuckle Chicago politics? Caucus fraud – which was rampant, many of the pro-Hillary groups opposing Obama’s nomination allege. A 98-page report that analyses caucuses held in 14 states, including CO, HI, IA, KS and MN, cites numerous examples of voter disenfranchisement, intimidation and fraud: (Obama added to his FACADE)

Voter Fraud (CO): Obama team picked up the packets the night before the caucus and maintained control of them.

Voter Intimidation (CO): Obama surrogates took over the caucuses.

Voter Fraud (HI): Many precincts ran out of ballots so “ballots” were created. Scraps of paper, post-it notes, and anything else voters could find was used as “ballots.” The caucuses ended up with more ballots than participants, a sure sign of voter fraud.

Voter Fraud (IA): There are numerous reports of the Obama campaign busing Illinois residents from to Iowa to participate in the Iowa caucus. Obama campaign openly acknowledges handing out fifty-thousand fliers advising students to “go back to school” to caucus. A look at a map of the caucus results shows Obama had a distinct dominance in the Eastern part of the state.

Voter Fraud (KS): Separate reports from different caucuses reported serious miscounts in the results. The count called out by the Precinct Captain did not match the number of participants in the room or the distribution of participants in the room.

Voter Fraud (MN): Caucus attendees interviewed were sure the count stated did not represent the people in the room.

Voter Disenfranchisement (MN): One woman reported waiting seven hours and still didn’t get a chance to caucus.

The grin is almost Chesire Cat-like, staying in a fixed position in every shot while the angle of the camera moves. The hands stay in exact position in relation to the body. The angle of the head doesn’t change over 130 frames, either. Either that’s a CARDBOARD CUTOUT, or like most politicians, Obama has learned to pose brilliantly, which is how he got elected President, after all.

(Obama is an empty suit or facade. A cardboard cutout that represents the results of voter fraud and "back stage" handling by media consultants. Americans were sold a defective product in the form of a cardboard facade that talked via the teleprompter. Behind the obama facade is an empty suit controlled by george soros, the un, and other puppet masters. The strings that make the obama facade move are the state controlled Liberal media.) Story Reports

Sunday, November 14, 2010

Are you shocked to learn congress passed the $700 billion "financial rescue package" that pays private bankers est 700 BILLION a year interest?

"Some people think that the Federal Reserve Banks are United States Government institutions. They are private monopolies which prey upon the people of these United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers; foreign and domestic speculators and swindlers; and rich and predatory money lenders."

– The Honorable Louis McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee in the 1930s

We the taxpayers will be paying interest to the banks on at least $700 billion annually!!!

Are you shocked to learn congress passed the $700 billion "financial rescue package" that pays private bankers est 700 BILLION a year interst on bank reserves This is a redistribution of wealth or "SPREADING THE WEALTH AROUND" as obama has stated he will do and has done via the "fed" reserve.

1. The Fed is privately owned.

Its shareholders are private banks. In fact, 100% of its shareholders are private banks. None of its stock is owned by the government.

2. The fact that the Fed does not get "appropriations" from Congress basically means that it gets its money from Congress without congressional approval, by engaging in "open market operations."

Here is how it works: When the government is short of funds, the Treasury issues bonds and delivers them to bond dealers, which auction them off. When the Fed wants to "expand the money supply" (create money), it steps in and buys bonds from these dealers with newly-issued dollars acquired by the Fed for the cost of writing them into an account on a computer screen. These maneuvers are called "open market operations" because the Fed buys the bonds on the "open market" from the bond dealers. The bonds then become the "reserves" that the banking establishment uses to back its loans. In another bit of sleight of hand known as "fractional reserve" lending, the same reserves are lent many times over, further expanding the money supply, generating interest for the banks with each loan. It was this money-creating process that prompted Wright Patman, Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee in the 1960s, to call the Federal Reserve "a total money-making machine." He wrote:

"When the Federal Reserve writes a check for a government bond it does exactly what any bank does, it creates money, it created money purely and simply by writing a check."

3. The Fed generates profits for its shareholders.

The interest on bonds acquired with its newly-issued Federal Reserve Notes pays the Fed’s operating expenses plus a guaranteed 6% return to its banker shareholders. A mere 6% a year may not be considered a profit in the world of Wall Street high finance, but most businesses that manage to cover all their expenses and give their shareholders a guaranteed 6% return are considered "for profit" corporations.

In addition to this guaranteed 6%, the banks will now be getting interest from the taxpayers on their "reserves." The basic reserve requirement set by the Federal Reserve is 10%. The website of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York explains that as money is redeposited and relent throughout the banking system, this 10% held in "reserve" can be fanned into ten times that sum in loans; that is, $10,000 in reserves becomes $100,000 in loans.

Federal Reserve Statistical Release H.8 puts the total "loans and leases in bank credit" as of September 24, 2008 at $7,049 billion. Ten percent of that is $700 billion.

That means we the taxpayers will be paying interest to the banks on at least $700 billion annually – this so that the banks can retain the reserves to accumulate interest on ten times that sum in loans.

(The obama and the other scum in congress pushed the so called $700 billion financial rescue package or stimulus package that included the provision to pay banks interst on their reserves. This makes the banks HOLD ONTO THEIR RESERVES because we the people are paying the banks interest to do so. This one of the reasons it is hard to get loans. Its more profitable and convenient to just not loan the money when the banks are already making a killing off the American taxpayer because of the obama democrate SCAM!) Story Reports

The banks earn these returns from the taxpayers for the privilege of having the banks’ interests protected by an all-powerful independent private central bank, even when those interests may be opposed to the taxpayers’ -- for example, when the banks use their special status as private money creators to fund speculative derivative schemes that threaten to collapse the U.S. economy. Among other special benefits, banks and other financial institutions (but not other corporations) can borrow at the low Fed funds rate of about 2%. They can then turn around and put this money into 30-year Treasury bonds at 4.5%, earning an immediate 2.5% from the taxpayers, just by virtue of their position as favored banks. A long list of banks (but not other corporations) is also now protected from the short selling that can crash the price of other stocks.

The Fed is privately owned. Its shareholders are private banks. Americans pay the fed interest on banks reserves est 700 Billion a year because of obama and democarate scam included in "stimulus" bill

The "Federal" Reserve admits scam on its own website READ THIS!!!!

From the "federal" reserve web site:

The Federal Reserve Banks pay interest on required reserve balances--balances held at Reserve Banks to satisfy reserve requirements--and on excess balances--balances held in excess of required reserve balances and contractual clearing balances. The Board of Governors has prescribed rules governing the payment of interest by Federal Reserve Banks in Regulation D (Reserve Requirements of Depository Institutions, 12 CFR Part 204).

The interest rate paid on required reserve balances is determined by the Board and is intended to eliminate effectively the implicit tax that reserve requirements used to impose on depository institutions. The interest rate paid on excess balances is also determined by the Board and gives the Federal Reserve an additional tool for the conduct of monetary policy.

The Board will continue to evaluate the appropriate settings of the rates paid on balances in light of evolving market conditions and make adjustments as needed.

The interest rates to be paid on required reserve balances and excess balances are posted to this website generally on the last Wednesday of the reserve maintenance period at 4:30 p.m.

(Are you shocked to learn Americans are paying private banks interest not to loan money? Are you shocked to learn the interest is est at 700 billion a year? Are you shocked to learn congress passed the $700 billion "financial rescue package" that pays private bankers est 700 BILLION a year on just the reserves banks hold?) Story Reports


"The Treasury Department, for the first time in its history, said it would begin selling bonds for the Federal Reserve in an effort to help the central bank deal with its unprecedented borrowing needs.

This is extraordinary. Why is the Treasury issuing U.S. government bonds (or debt) to fund the Fed, which is itself supposedly "the lender of last resort" created to fund the banks and the federal government? Yahoo Finance reported on September 17:


"The Term Securities Lending Facility is a 28-day facility that will offer Treasury general collateral to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s primary dealers in exchange for other program-eligible collateral. It is intended to promote liquidity in the financing markets for Treasury and other collateral and thus to foster the functioning of financial markets more generally. . . . The resource allows dealers to switch debt that is less liquid for U.S. government securities that are easily tradable."

"To switch debt that is less liquid for U.S. government securities that are easily tradable" means that the government gets the banks’ toxic derivative debt, and the banks get the government’s triple-A securities. Unlike the risky derivative debt, federal securities are considered "risk-free" for purposes of determining capital requirements, allowing the banks to improve their capital position so they can make new loans.

In its latest power play, on October 3, 2008, the Fed acquired the ability to pay interest to its member banks on the reserves the banks maintain at the Fed. Reuters reported on October 3:

"The U.S. Federal Reserve gained a key tactical tool from the $700 billion financial rescue package signed into law on Friday that will help it channel funds into parched credit markets. Tucked into the 451-page bill is a provision that lets the Fed pay interest on the reserves banks are required to hold at the central bank."

If the Fed’s money comes ultimately from the taxpayers, that means we the taxpayers are paying interest to the banks on the banks’ own reserves – reserves maintained for their own private profit.

(Did ya get that the "fed" reserve is running a scam on the American people because of the the $700 billion financial rescue package signed into law and rammed through congress?) Story Reports

The Fed reserve scam via the obama "stimulus" redistribution of wealth scam


THE GREEDY BASTARDS IN CONGRESS have led you to believe it was greedy banks and wall st that scammed the American people.

In fact THE GREEDY BASTARDS IN CONGRESS made it possible for SOME GREEDY BASTARDS in banks and wall st to scam the American TAXPAYER!!!!

Capitalism had nothing to do with the obama scam.)

Story Reports

Capitalism is a social system based on the recognition of individual rights.

What is capitalism?

Capitalism is a social system based on the recognition of individual rights, including property rights, in which all property is privately owned. Under capitalism the state is separated from economics (production and trade), just like the state is separated from religion. Capitalism is the system of of laissez faire. It is the system of political freedom.

What is a capitalist?

An advocate of laissez-faire is known as a capitalist, e.g., novelist Ayn Rand is a capitalist; e.g., though economically Engels came from a wealthy background, politically he is recognized as a socialist/communist because of his ideas; e.g., billionaire George Soros is not a capitalist as he does not advocate capitalism, but he advocates some form of a mixed economy statism. Soros like Ted Turner is a "socialist at heart."

Capitalism is a social system based on the principle of individual rights.

The radio program money talks never mentions the est 700 billion interest the American taxpayer is paying private banks on their reserves.

The first and biggest change to save taxpayer money should be to repeal the interest paid to private banks on their reserves.

Bob Brinker never mentions this. He talks about cutting entitlement programs and how Americans will not allow this.

Bob Brinker the host of money talks is also a FRAUD!