Over 100 FREE Online Calculators

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

Wasted Time With People Who Lie And Defend The Liar obama

People who believe obama are either deceived or are themselves like obama deceivers. Don't waste your time trying to convince them obama is a liar.
Brief History of the United States Citizen Militia

It does not take a majority to prevail … but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men. … If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands, which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. --- Samuel Adams

Wasted Time With People Who Lie And Defend The Liar obama

Time for a reality check. There are people who will defend obama and not deny he is a liar. How do they do this? These people will counter with the argument that people who listen to Rush Limbaugh, for example, believe a liar.

They will not deny obama is a liar and also add that both republicans and democrates promise things and lie during campaigns. They say both republicans and democrates don't keep promises they make. They equate not keeping promises with not doing what was promised during a campaign. This a form of lying. Not only does obama not keep promises he makes but lies about what he will do and has done. Obama lies about what congress is doing. He only speaks in partial terms or vague, obscure and minimal ways. He uses key words to invoke emotions and hide the truth of his lies.

Obama supporters become surrogates for obama. They morph into liars just like obama. They transform themselves into the epitome of a liar and mimic obama.

My point is these people waste a sane person's valuable time. Don't waste anymore time with people who mimic their hero obama. Don't argue with them. Don't engage them. These people are not worth the energy expended to explain simple facts.

Instead work to explain real facts about the FRAUD obama to sane people who have not given themselves over literally to "the dark side". "The dark side" represents all who deny the truth and believe a lie.

These people are beyond hope. There are many who lack the knowledge of the truth about obama or ignore it. There are many who have been deceived by obama and the "state run media". Many people can be told the truth and then make up their own minds without the "state run media" obama uses to sell his lies to the public.

I confronted an individual today about obama and this was the result. He attempted to make an example out of Rush Limbaugh as a liar. I asked him, give me one example of a lie Rush has told. (Remember a mistake is not a lie if it is corrected and was done in honesty.) There was total silence. No response. No answer to my question. I was surprised. I expected him to say something Rush had said then corrected and then try to tell me this was a lie Rush had spoken. Obama does not make mistakes but lies on purpose. Seldom is there a correction unless he must because it is so obvious.

This is one way obama supporters operate. They can deny the truth. They can also ignore the truth and point to another individual as their example of a liar to hide the facts about obama.

As I said these people are not worth wasting any time on. Concentrate on people who live in reality. Work with people who still are able to think on their own.

There is hope. I won't waste my time anymore with people who believe and support the liar obama. Obama is not just an occasional liar. Obama is a lie manifested as somebody that everyone can trust and belive.

Obama was cross bred as a liar and deceiver. People who believe obama are either deceived or are themselves like obama deceivers. The blind leading the blind. Most of them are beyond hope.

Find free men and women who want to stay free and speak the truth to them. The truth will set you free but a lie will keep you in bondage. Obama supporters are in bondage to obama. They are in effect his "slaves". Obama purchased them with his deception and half truths or twisted truths.

Don't stay in bondage to obama. Break the chains of his lies and deceptions. Think for yourself. Research what obama does and says. Compare what he does and says with what happens. You will find obama is a con man and a FRAUD. If you check out what obama does and says with the truth of what really happens you will loose the chains of your bondgage.

Obama is a destroyer. A deceiver. A task master or slave owner.


"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials." -George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

"The militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves, ... all men capable of bearing arms;..." -"Letters from the Federal Farmer to the Republic", 1788 (either Richard Henry Lee or Melancton Smith).

"Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom? Congress shall have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American ... The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the People." --Tench Coxe, 1788.

"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have ... The course of history shows that as a government grows, Liberty decreases." -- Thomas Jefferson, 3rd president of the US (1743 - 1826)

Monday, March 29, 2010

Obama is a sick man and should be removed from office

This is a limited record of a habitual, shameless liar, a man who will say anything to get what he wants.

President Obama evidently believes that he can solve any problem with a speech. But he really does not care whether what he says is true or not, nor does he feel any responsibility to honor the assurances and promises he makes. As a result, this nation is now in a position where it cannot believe a word that he says, and that amounts to an unprecedented crisis of confidence in the Presidency. Democratic government will atrophy if we allow lying on this scale to count as the business as usual of politics.

(The point here is that obama will do or say anything to further his marxist communist agenda which is the total destruction of America as we know it. Obama has said he will transform and change America. Obama was saying he would enslave Americans and strip their freedoms away two ways. Some would be taken away slowly others faster but all opposition would be crushed under the heavy hand of the obama marxism sold to the public as "change" for their good. Obama is domestic enemy number one. A traitor to America and the enemy from within.) Story Reports

Barack Obama’s lies are far more corrosive and destructive, because they go to the heart of legislation and governance, and seriously undermine trust in government. His lies generally take a specific form: they attempt to persuade people to vote for him or his policies by categorically assuring them that they need not have the anxieties that they have been expressing. The lies say, essentially: trust me, support what I want, and I promise that what you fear will never happen. But in every case it soon becomes clear either that he knew perfectly well that what the public feared would in fact happen, or that he was giving a firm assurance that he was in no position to give, or that he had no intention of following through on his promise.

A short list of accumulated deciet by Obama’s is overwhelming:

* During his campaign for the presidency and since, Obama repeatedly assured us that he would protect Medicare against cuts; but he now presses for passage of bills that include savage cuts in Medicare.

* To obtain passage of his first stimulus bill, Obama assured us that 90% of the jobs created would be in the private sector; but as he well knew, most of them were to be in the public sector.

* Early in the health care debate, Obama assured us that he had not said that he favored a single payer system; but he was on record as having said exactly that.

* Obama gave primary voters a firm assurance that if he became the nominee of the Democratic party he would (unlike Hillary Clinton) abide by the campaign finance limits of public funding; but as soon as he became the party’s nominee, he reneged on that pledge.

* During the presidential campaign Obama criticized the presence of former lobbyists in the Bush administration and solemnly assured us that he would appoint no lobbyists to his administration; but once elected he proceeded to appoint even more lobbyists than his predecessors.

* Obama criticized the size of George Bush’s deficit and promised to stop deficit spending if elected; but he has already quadrupled the size of the deficit he objected to and recklessly continues new federal spending in the trillions.

* When campaigning Obama criticized bills before the congress that were too long for anyone to be able to read and promised to stop that; but the bills he has been backing throughout his first year are infinitely longer (2000+ pages) than the ones he criticized.

* Candidate Obama promised an end to the corruption of earmarks and pork, but in the bills he has supported this year there have been more and bigger earmarks than ever before.

* Candidate Obama promised us that CIA personnel involved in the interrogation of terrorists would not be prosecuted; but his administration is now doing exactly that.

* Obama assured a joint session of Congress that the health bill he supported (pre-Stupak) would not provide public funding for abortions; but bitter resistance on the part of House Democrats to inclusion of language to that effect soon proved that it did.

* Candidate Obama promised that he would make sure that there was always enough time for the public to read legislation before it was enacted; but he has done exactly the opposite, repeatedly pressing for even faster passage of even longer bills.

* Candidate Obama met fears that he would be a tax and spend liberal by promising, emphatically and repeatedly, that those earning under $200,000 would see no increase in their taxes of any kind; but he now urges passage of a healthcare bill that breaks that pledge in many different ways, and his unrestrained increase in federal spending makes more tax increases inevitable.

* Candidate Obama promised bipartisanship and an end to partisan bickering; but in a display of especially ruthless partisanship his allies have shut Republicans out of all key meetings on his health care initiative, with the unprecedented result that domestic legislation of historic importance garnered not a single Republican vote in the Senate.

* Candidate Obama criticized his opponent’s plan to tax employer paid healthcare benefits, and promised he would not tax them; but the bill he now backs will do just that.

* Obama had promised that he would not sign a healthcare bill that would add one dime to the federal deficit; but the bill he now backs adds trillions in new federal spending, offset only by new sources of revenue that are both uncertain and more properly seen as offsetting the already existing deficit.

* Obama coerced congress into passing his stimulus bill by promising that if it were passed unemployment could go no higher then 8%; but unemployment is now at 10%, and he could not possibly have had good reason to exclude that possibility.

* Obama promised that his cap and trade legislation will create jobs; but its massive tax increases will certainly hobble the economy and destroy jobs, while green jobs in significant numbers can at best be hoped for, but never promised.

* Obama has repeatedly assured the American people that if they like their current health plan they can keep it; but the House bill which he supported created huge incentives for employers to drop their coverage and shift their members to a public option.

* Obama has just as often assured the public that under his health plan everyone will be able to keep their current doctor; but many are certain to lose their doctors when ObamaCare’s large cuts in Medicare funding induce more doctors to withdraw from Medicare coverage, as they also would were employers to transfer patients to a public option to save money.

* Obama assured a joint session of Congress that his health plan would not fund illegal aliens; but his allies had been busy voting down amendments to that effect. (This was the point of Joe Wilson’s outburst.)

* Obama claimed that Caterpillar’s CEO had told him that Caterpillar would begin hiring again as a result of the stimulus bill; but that individual immediately announced that he had said no such thing, and that Caterpillar would in fact be laying off more workers.

* Candidate Obama promised that Guantanamo would be closed by January 1, 2010; but it is still open.

* Candidate Obama promised that his administration (unlike his predecessor’s) would be so transparent that TV cameras (C-Span) would be there for key deliberations; but an unprecedented level of secrecy prevails as the final stages of Obamacare are negotiated behind closed doors and kept so secret that even the Senate majority whip admitted that he had no idea what was going on. Requests for Obama to honor the promise of C-Span cameras are being ignored.

* To gain traction for his attempt to return a would-be socialist dictator in Honduras to power, Obama claimed that he had been overthrown in an illegal coup; but the congressional research service pointed out correctly that ex-President Zelaya had been removed for constitutionally sufficient cause by legal and constitutional means.

* Obama claims that he wants a public option only to increase choice and competition; but the House bill would clearly reduce choice both by squeezing unsubsidized private health plans out of the market, and by setting rigid conditions on acceptable plans that would narrow available options.

* Candidate Obama claimed that violent radical Bill Ayers was just another guy in his neighborhood; but the record shows that the two had worked closely together.

* Obama assured us that his stimulus bill would create or save a million jobs; but he was claiming as fact what could never have been more than a wild (and highly improbable) guess, and his more recent attempts to justify that guess have been fraudulent.

* Obama assured us that his health plan would never ration care, or “pull the plug” on grandma; but the legislation he backs sets up panels to make crucial decisions on when to withhold care, and it makes such deep cuts in Medicare that rationing is inevitable.

* Obama now assures us that health insurance premiums will not go up if ObamaCare becomes law, insisting indignantly that people who say this have not read the bill; but the legislation forces insurers to cover preexisting conditions, which will compel them to raise premiums substantially.

(Obama's lies go beyond irrational. Obama is irrational. He now knows his time is short. His season is about to come to a close with the nov 2010 elections. Obama must make his marxist moves now without regard to what Americans do or think. Obama I believe is mentally ill in addition to being a narcissist. I believe he has pathological narcissism and megalomania. Obama has an obsession with grandiose or extravagant things or actions. Obama is a sick man. He should be removed from office.) Story Reports

Sunday, March 28, 2010

State revolutionary dictatorship of the proletariat via the FCC regulating the internet

Red State:

Fcc chairman genachowski and the obama FCC are placing sensible cost-cutting and efficiency-gaining innovations in jeopardy with their talk of heavy-handed government regulation of the industry. The Internet has flourished since it came out from the thumb of government control when it was the ARPAnet, and became the free-wheeling marketplace it is today. Clearly, that scares people who want government to be in control of things.

And it’s total control they want, too. Because the second principle Genachowski asked for, “transparency,” doesn’t mean transparency of government. No, it means that the government is to claim the right to have access to every router in America, every switch, and every other piece of hardware that makes the Internet go. Public or Private, the FCC wants to be able to snoop on how it runs, to be able to control how it runs.

(This is the State revolutionary dictatorship of the proletariat, lower class, as obama views Americans. The FCC wants control of even your personal home router. To control how it runs. To control what you read and hear. To control the population. To turn American into a police state.) Story Reports

Does that scare you? It should. When you connect to the Internet, your home computer network (even if it’s just one computer) is now on the Internet. The Internet is not like a public road. It’s a vast series of private networks, all connected together. Government wants control over the whole ball of yarn, how everyone configures and runs their own private computers routing the packets of the Internet.

That control will have one immediate impact: The FCC will be picking winners and losers on the Internet, which is why Google is 100% behind this effort. Google will be a winner, thanks in no small part to its close ties with the Obama administration through Google CEO and Obama advisor Eric Schmidt, while those who invest in the capital of the Internet, the wires that criss-cross the country and the planet, will lose. If you look at any of the literature put out by the pro-Net Neutrality forces, you’ll see plenty of villification of ISPs, AT&T in particular.

The hope of the Net Neutrality left is that you’ll forget that today’s AT&T isn’t the huge monopolist of old, big and hated by many Americans. No, that AT&T is gone, and what is now called AT&T is actually the scrappy little Cingular, a company comparable in market capitalization to Internet firms like Google and Microsoft (and in fact Cingular/AT&T’s a bit smaller).

Of course, such class warfare is old hat to a little left-wing organization called "Free Press". Co-founded by a man named Robert McChesney, the organization I believe is best expressed as neo-Marxist. While the original Marxists wanted control of the means of production of goods, today the groups like Free Press want the state to control the means of production of information, as ours is increasing an information-driven economy.

(Remember obama is a MARXIST and wants to control all information through government regulation to regulate and kill any objection to his rule over America.) Story Reports

"Free Press" traditionally has sought tight state controls over television and radio, but now they have turned their attention to the Internet. They even have a front group for that purpose, called Save the Internet.

(These marxists groups work hand in sickle with obama to rape Americans freedoms. Obama uses these front groups and supports them as they support him. Obama wants to kill free speech on the internet and every where else he possibly can. He must do this so his propaganda will be majority of what we hear or read. Obama can't kill the messege but he can kill the messenger and the message of the free internet.) Story Reports

Save the Internet is innocuous looking at first. They take full advantage both major deceptions of the Net Neutrality movement. First, they make you think this is all a harmless little bit of technocracy, and not a power grab. In fact they’ve used that to trick some rightys into thinking that without Net Neutrality, ISPs might censor content. In fact it’s just the opposite: It’s only if Net Neutrality comes into effect that the censors of the left will even have the power to control the Internet.

Phase one, Net Neutrality, includes no plans to regulate content, just routing. But just as the FCC regulates content on television and radio, most famously in the case of the Janet Jackson Super Bowl show, so too will it be able to regulate content on the Internet should Net Neutrality be the law of the land.

The fight has already begun to prevent it, though. Comcast has taken the FCC to court, arguing that the FCC’s current reaches into Internet regulation go beyond the statutory powers the FCC has been granted. In fact, those who watch this industry closely tell me that the federal courts at this point are almost sure to rule in Comcast’s favor.

Genachowski has a plan though. It’s one you may have heard of before: Deem and pass. The backup plan the FCC has, in the event that the courts rule that the FCC no longer has the authority to regulate information services on the Internet, is to deem that ISPs are no longer information providers, and then re-pass the same regulations that the courts just threw out, then pass Net Neutrality on top of that. Once that happens, the government will be taking over another sixth of the economy.

Verizon is taking a leading role against the new deem and pass (demonpass?), and AT&T agrees, calling upon the Congress to take up these issues rather than leaving the FCC to expand beyond its legal bounds to do these things on its own. Of course, Democrats lack the votes for Net Neutrality, so it’s easy to see why nothing’s happened on that front.

We have to stop it, though. If ISPs are hindered, then the very foundation of the Internet will be hindered. The Internet’s backbone must continue to grow and to innovate as needed to withstand the ever-growing traffic burden we put on it, and no regulatory framework can keep up with how fast the Internet is changing. The market and competition will stamp out any hostile behavior faster than the government ever could, and without even any distortions or government-chosen winners and losers.

In particular, the coming wave of wireless, high-speed Internet access is going to rock the foundations of the broadband market. Sprint is already deploying its 4G WiMax network. When AT&T and Verizon counter with their 4G LTE networks, cable and DSL Internet will feel unprecedented pressure to deliver the best service to their customers for the lowest price. Unfettered technological advancement will save the day, not government.

As Reagan put it, “government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.”

(Its more than just a problem now. Its all of Americans freedoms at stake. Obama will do anything to limit free speech. Anything. The FRAUD must be stopped at all cost. We as Americans are in a life and death struggle for our freedoms with the marxist obama. This is reality.) Story Reports

Ultimately, the goal of neo-Marxists like McChesney and Free Press is to have Single Payer Internet, with all the central government control and lack of freedom that the comparison with Single Payer Socialized Medicine would imply. Just as the “Public Option” for medicine was described as a “right” by the Democrats, so too do the Free Press people want Internet access to be a “right,” owned, operated, and controlled by the government. The UK has its doctors and hospitals controlled by the National Health Service, and McChesney would have our Internet under the control of a National Internet Service.

Phase 1 of Single Payer Internet is Net Neutrality, which establishes the baseline of FCC authority over the Internet. Phase 2 is the National Broadband Plan. To continue the Obamacare comparison, the goal of the Plan is to get “universal coverage.” Even if you live in the middle of nowhere, in a place that’s far too expensive to wire up, even though the technology is right around the corner for wireless Internet to come at high speed, the FCC neo-Marxists want to say everyone has a right to wired Internet access. And guess what will pay for it?

That’s right, you and I will pay for it with new taxes. For phones we already pay a “universal service” tax. The FCC wants to expand that to high speed Internet connections, thus, an Internet Tax. This is a tax that would never see a single Congressional vote, because the FCC would apply it all on its own with the authority vested in it by deem-and-pass Net Neutrality.

On top of that, prices will go up if the National Broadband Plan becomes reality. Your Internet bill at home could go up 25%.

And again, innovation will suffer further. Once the FCC starts dictating control over even the set top boxes your cable providers hand out to you, and after they’ve already taken control over routing on the Internet, truly there will be few or no ways for Internet service to get better in America without a game of Mother May I. Just think: In 10 years maybe even Iraq would have better Internet access than we’d have, should all this come about.

Of course, just as with Net Neutrality’s two big lies, the National Broadband Plan has a big lie behind it. Namely, the claim is that America “lags behind” the rest of the world in high-speed Internet access, and the problem is that there isn’t enough government involved yet. Once you stop laughing when given this argument, ask the neo-Marxist questioning you to adjust the broadband statistics for demographics and geography. Countries like Japan and the Netherlands have better Internet access per person not because their governments are working better, but because they are smaller, more densely populated countries. America will always have a different profile of Internet access as long as Americans are free to live anywhere we want on the fruited plain, whether in an apartment in a big city, on a farm on the plain, or in a cabin in the mountains.

(This is the type of information obama uses and tells Americans. It is a combination of half truth and lie. Obama cannot tell Americans the truth. The truth is not in him. Obama is just a marxist liar. Nothing more nothing less) Story Reports

It’s the same reason that American Internet access varies from Europe and Asia, that our need for the automobile varies from the rest of the world. We’re spread out, and we value our freedom to be spread out. And just as you can’t run public transit to every little suburb and rural area, so too can’t you immediately and cheaply get the best Internet access out to everyone at the same time. Higher costs, delayed implementations. These are facts of geography, and no amount of FCC regulation can fix that.

(Obama will tell you though this is possible and this is needed. It is like a "crisis" he creates to grab more control of your freedoms while telling you its all for your own good. Obama is poison. Obama is death to America. Obama is similar to rohm E. in that he is evil and they could be twins. Sons of the devils spawn or worse.) Story Reports

It’s harder to fight an unelected, unaccountable regulatory agency than it is a congressional action, but we can try. We’re the people and we will be heard.

(An elected and unaccountable congress is hard to fight also. It is obvious that this is what we are also fighting.) Story Reports

The FRAUD and LIAR obama appoints craig becker to the National Labor Relations Board

The FRAUD and LIAR obama appoints craig becker to the National Labor Relations Board while Congress is in recess.

The FRAUD obama said:

"The United States Senate has the responsibility to approve or disapprove of my nominees. But if, in the interest of scoring political points, Republicans in the Senate refuse to exercise that responsibility, I must act in the interest of the American people and exercise my authority to fill these positions on an interim basis," he said in a written statement.

This is again a total lie.

All 41 Senate Republicans wrote Obama this week urging him not to use a recess appointment for Becker, a former top lawyer with Service Employees International Union and the AFL-CIO, whose nomination was rejected by the Senate last month, 52-43.

Becker's nomination was rejected by the senate 52 to 43. The republicans don't have the majority in the senate. It was republicans and democrates that rejected becker's nomination.

Obama is ruling against the will of the people. Becker's appointment is not in the interest of the American people it only in obama's interest to get another communist/socialist in the government.

"This recess appointment disregards the Senate's bipartisan rejection of Craig Becker's nomination to the NLRB," Chamber Vice President Randel Johnson said in a written statement.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce also wrote Obama on behalf of 20 business groups that opposed Becker's nomination and decried the recess appointment.

"Overriding the will of the Senate and providing this special interest payback contradicts the president's claim to change the tone in Washington," he said. "The business community should be on red alert for radical changes that could significantly impair the ability of America's job creators to compete."