Over 100 FREE Online Calculators

Saturday, January 23, 2010

SEC Tipped Off About Madoff Financial Fraud Numerous Times Since 1999 But Did NOTHING

The picture on the people of Chicago's faces after obama failed by his speech and presence to bring the olympics to Chicago left them asking, what happened, what went wrong?
Madoff investigation identifies a web of players in Ponzi scheme

SEC Tipped Off About Madoff Financial Fraud Numerous Times Since 1999 But Did NOTHING.

There were multiple failures of the SEC to fully investigate Madoff despite credible evidence presented to the agency over the years. Top of the list: financial fraud investigator Harry Markopolos tipped off the SEC numerous times since 1999, including a now-famous lengthy 2005 report detailing Madoff's Ponzi scheme and pointing out 29 red flags. Nothing was done.

The World's Largest Hedge Fund is a Fraud Report The SEC Ignored

"If the SEC had followed it up, they would have shut Madoff down and saved investors at least $14 billion," Jacobs said. "In my opinion, that was criminal negligence. It's like looking for the evidence in a murder, finding the evidence and then saying 'let's go have a cup of tea.'"

I believe the US government knew exactly what madoff was doing. Certain people were making millions in the government via the fraud madoff or they were being paid off with hush money. Harry Markopolos financial fraud investigator informed the SEC in detail about the madoff scam. Nothing was done to investigate or stop it. This is criminal. When criminals are in charge of investigating criminals this is what you get, corruption. Today has been the first year of the obama administration. It is in effect criminals investigating criminals and honest US citizens. The obama CON continues.

When obama was elected the fraud was given the "keys" to the safe deposit box of the US. As soon as he had the keys the madoff ponzi scheme was once again played but using congress. The US congress invested in obama knowing the scheme of "economic recovery" was similar to the madoff scheme. Madoff and obama are very similar. Both are con men. Both are criminal sociopaths.

The sociopathic personality

Unlike the popular belief about them, they are not all serial killers. In fact, one could almost put the criminal sociopath in another category. However, they can be quite dangerous. They are devoid of feeling and can perform the most inhumane acts without an ounce of guilt or remorse. They also have the capacity to put on an act of remorse, which can throw one off and into believing they really do feel. It is always an act. They consider themselves superior to all others and hold themselves above humanity. They are exceedingly arrogant and always right. If crossed, they can move from an appearance of compassion and caring to a cold-blooded killer in an instant.

(1) Capacity to put on an act of remorse.

(2) They consider themselves superior to all others and hold themselves above humanity.

(3) They are exceedingly arrogant and always right.

Obama is a criminal sociopath.

Because they are without feeling, they can often fool a lie detector test, as they have no physiological responses to lying. Arguing with them is a lost cause. They will always out-maneuver someone and prove them wrong.

(This sounds just like obama.)

They can play a role very well. Life is a game and people are pieces on their game board to be moved at their will. If one doesn't play their game, they will have no use for them. If one begins to play their game and gets in their way, they will eliminate that person by either destroying or by discarding them.

(Again this sounds like obama.)

Because they live larger than life and are highly seductive, many people find them attractive, particularly individuals who are a bit timid and believe they can succeed by “going along for the ride”. Sociopaths prey on the innocent. They are the true predators of humanity. The cost to the individuals in their web and to society is immeasurable.

(This is a description of obama.)

Obama, will choose you, disarm you with his words, and control you with his presence. He will delight you with his wit and his plans. He will show you a good time, but you will always get the bill. He will smile and deceive you, and he will scare you with his eyes. And when he is through with you, and he will be through with you, he will desert you and take with him your innocence and your pride. You will be left much sadder but not a lot wiser, and for a long time you will wonder what happened and what you did wrong. And if another of his kind comes knocking at your door, will you open it?

This is EXACTLY what many Americans are thinking one year after the criminal sociopath obama has seduced them. A picture is worth a thousand words. The picture on the people of Chicago's faces, after obama failed by his speech and presence to bring the olympics to Chicago, left them asking; what happened, what went wrong? This is what the majority of Americans are asking today. Why hasn't obama done what he promised? Why has the US economy not recovered from the recession? Why is unemployment so high? Why does obama continue to speak in a haughty way? Why does obama ignore the facts about the US economy? Is obama for real? Is it all just haughty speeches and no real production of anything uselful? IS OBAMA A FRAUD? I can answer that. YES!

There are other criminal sociopaths in congress. There are also corrupt members of congress who will take obama's bribes and then be deserted. This is what a sociopath does. No true inner quilt feelings. No heart, no conscience. Its all about him. Get the picture now?

(Can an egg sucking dog be cured? NO.) Jethro (barry) keeps telling us the recession is over and the economy is recovering. Jethro's limited and aborted education allows (barry) to cipher the economic numbers. Remember jethro was allowed to graduate from the sixth grade. Because (barry) won't release any information about his "education" transcripts will can assume he at least "graduated" from the sixth grade. So just because jethro (barry) was allowed to graduate because of affirmative progress doesn't mean he is qualified to be a "economy brain surgeon". Barry has committed malpractice on the US economy and the stimulus insurance hasn't paid off. Jethro (barry) lives in a world where he thinks he knows it all. Jethro (barry) is happy as long as he thinks he accomplishes something. Mr Drysdale (state run media) keeps jethro in the dark about his real abilities. Everyday jethro (barry) keeps busy failing and is proud to to it. Jethro is not living in the real world. Barry is living in the state run media world. A virtual reality world where he is a successful failure. Jethro and barry obama must be related.) Story Reports


Friday, January 22, 2010

Kentucky Census Worker Killed Himself

Investigators: Kentucky Census Worker Killed Himself

He didn't leave a note.

Friends and co-workers have said that even while undergoing chemotherapy for cancer, Sparkman would show up for work smiling with a toboggan cap to cover his balding head.

(His motovation for killing himself was money and the fact he was dying from cancer.)

Investigators believe he killed himself and made it look like a murder because he'd recently taken out two life insurance policies that wouldn't pay out for suicide.

Anti-government sentiment was initially one possibility in the death. Authorities said Sparkman had discussed perceived negative views of the federal government in the area.

(What authorities? I think it was the state run media that sent out the message "anti-government" sentiment was the cause. The state run media, liberal controlled media, wanted it to be caused by anti-government sentiment.)Story Reports

A Kentucky census worker found hanging from a tree with the word "fed" written on his chest killed himself and staged his death to look like a murder, authorities said Tuesday.

Kentucky State Police said Bill Sparkman died at the same location where his body was found Sept. 12 near a cemetery in a heavily wooded area of southeastern Kentucky.

A man who discovered the body in the Daniel Boone National Forest said the 51-year-old was bound with duct tape, gagged and had an identification badge taped to his neck.

Police told a news conference Tuesday that Sparkman was naked except for socks and had his glasses taped to his face "so he could see what he was doing."

Kentucky State Police Capt. Lisa Rudzinski said the investigation revealed that the letters "fed" scrawled on his chest in black pen had been written from the bottom up and Sparkman's DNA was the only forensic evidence found at the scene.

He was touching the ground, and to survive "all Mr. Sparkman had to do at any time was stand up," she said.

Sparkman spoke to a witness they wouldn't name about hanging himself and making it look like someone else killed him, according to Rudzinski.

Authorities say Sparkman acted alone in manipulating the scene to conceal the suicide.

"Our investigation, based on evidence and witness testimony, has concluded that Mr. Sparkman died during an intentional, self-inflicted act that was staged to appear as a homicide," Rudzinski said.

Sparkman's mother, Henrie Sparkman of Inverness, Fla., bristled at the conclusion: "I disagree!" she wrote in an e-mail to The Associated Press.

Investigators believe he killed himself and made it look like a murder because he'd recently taken out two life insurance policies that wouldn't pay out for suicide.

But they didn't say what motivated Sparkman to end his life in the first place. He didn't leave a note, Rudzinski told reporters.

If Sparkman had been killed on the job, his family also would have been be eligible for up to $10,000 in death gratuity payments from the government.

He was not eligible for a separate life insurance policy through the government because his census work was intermittent, Census Bureau spokesman Stephen Buckner has previously said.

The Census Bureau suspended door-to-door interviews in the rural county after Sparkman's body was found.

Anti-government sentiment was initially one possibility in the death. Authorities said Sparkman had discussed perceived negative views of the federal government in the area.

A friend of Sparkman's, Gilbert Acciardo, previously told The Associated Press that he warned Sparkman to be careful when he did his census work.

Acciardo, a retired Kentucky state trooper, said he told Sparkman people in the rural area would perceive him differently because he worked for the federal government.

Henrie Sparkman has said her son was an Eagle scout who moved to the area to be a local director for the Boy Scouts of America. He later became a substitute teacher in Laurel County and supplemented that income as a census worker.

Friends and co-workers have said that even while undergoing chemotherapy for cancer, Sparkman would show up for work smiling with a toboggan cap to cover his balding head. They said he was punctual and dependable.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Be Cautious About Giving Info To Census Workers
Remember, no matter what they ask, you really only need to tell them how many people live at your address.

With the U.S. Census process beginning, the Better Business Bureau (BBB) advises people to be cooperative, but cautious, so as not to become a victim of fraud or identity theft. The first phase of the 2010 U.S. Census is under way and workers have begun verifying the addresses of households across the country. Eventually, more than 140,000 U.S. Census workers will count every person in the United States and will gather information about every person living at each address including name, age, gender, race, and other relevant data.

The big question is - how do you tell the difference between a U.S. Census worker and a con artist? BBB offers the following advice:

If a U.S. Census worker knocks on your door, they will have a badge, a handheld device, a Census Bureau canvas bag, and a confidentiality notice. Ask to see their identification and their badge before answering their questions. However, you should never invite anyone you don't know into your home.

Census workers are currently only knocking on doors to verify address information. Do not give your Social Security number, credit card or banking information to anyone, even if they claim they need it for the U.S. Census.

Remember, no matter what they ask, you really only need to tell them how many people live at your address.

While the Census Bureau might ask for basic financial information, such as a salary range, you don't have to answer anything at all about your financial situation. The Census Bureau will not ask for Social Security, bank account, or credit card numbers, nor will Census Bureau employees solicit donations. Any one asking for that information is NOT with the Census Bureau.

The census bureau has decided not to work with acorn on gathering this information. No Acorn worker should approach you saying he/she is with the Census Bureau.

Eventually, Census workers may contact you by telephone, mail, or in person at home. However, the Census Bureau will not contact you by Email, so be on the lookout for Email scams impersonating the Census.

Never click on a link or open any attachments in an Email that are supposedly from the U.S. Census Bureau.

For more advice on avoiding identity theft and fraud, visit


Let me add you don't have to tell the government a damn thing about your personal life.

Thursday, January 21, 2010

The Fuehrer (leader) obama is a failure

The World Bids Farewell to Obama

The World from Berlin (The Fuehrer obama is a failure.)

This week, though -- a week when Obama should have been celebrating the first anniversary of his inauguration -- may have been the president's worst yet. Scott Brown, an almost unknown Republican member of the Massachusetts Senate, defeated the Democratic candidate Martha Coakley for the US Senate seat vacated by the death of Senator Edward M. Kennedy. The defeat in a heavily Democratic state not only highlights Obama's massive loss of popular support during his first year in office, but it also could spell doom for his signature effort to reform the US health care system.

The omen could be a dark one for the Obama administration heading into a mid-term election year.

"For everyone else in the world, this means that they will have to bid farewell to a candidate for whom the hopes were so high. They will have to say goodbye to the charisma they fell in love with. Obama will be staying home after all."


"Of course the president rejects the interpretation that the Massachusetts election was a referendum on his first year in the White House. But he cannot ignore the fact that his health care reform package is not popular, the situation of the country's finances is seen as threatening and many voters blame the high unemployment rate on the party in power -- on the Democrats, led by Obama. The result is a second year in office full of very different challenges than the first. To save what there is to be saved, Obama will have to be prepared to fashion a bipartisan compromise on health care -- a compromise with a Republican Party which has tasted blood and can now dream once again about a return to power."

MaryJo's Revenge

"We can't win them all" - so said One Term Barry as he called the defeated Democrat candidate for Ted Kennedy's old Senate seat, which the GOP won handsomely overnight.

Obama, who celebrates a year in office today (happy anniversary, Mr President...) is right. The GOP also won the two gubernatorial races held last November in New Jersey and Virginia.

Such is the hubris of Barack Hussein Obama that he began to believe all the hype written about him. I wonder if he's reading the press today?

The delicious irony in Ted Kennedy's death costing Obama healthcare reform will not be lost on Americans. Over 40 years after he killed Mary-Jo Kopechne at Chappaquiddick, an incident that should have seen Kennedy jailed and kicked out of the Senate by the people of Massachusetts, they have finally done the right thing - and Mary-Jo gets her revenge so as to ensure that Kennedy's lasting legacy isn't the healthcare reform the lecherous old soak had campaigned for so long.

You have 2 cows.
You give one to your neighbour.

You have 2 cows.
The State takes both and gives you some milk.

You have 2 cows.
The State takes both and sells you some milk.

You have 2 cows.
The State takes both and shoots you.

You have 2 cows.
The State takes both, shoots one, milks the other, and then throws the milk away..

You have 2 cows.
One milks the other and doesn't know what to do with it.


South Carolina General Assembly


Whereas, the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights established a federal government limited in scope and guarantee of personal liberty so that our citizens will be free to pursue their inalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as recognized in the Declaration of Independence; and

Whereas, the Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people"; and

Whereas, pursuant to the Ninth Amendment, the people are guaranteed the right to privacy as a basic human right; and

Whereas, the delivery, administration, and receipt of medical care affects personal privacy and involves the most intimate and personal of choices; and

Whereas, the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people"; and

Whereas, the Tenth Amendment defines the limited scope of federal power as being that specifically granted by the United States Constitution; and

Whereas, pursuant to the Tenth Amendment, by limiting the scope of federal power to only those specifically enumerated in the United States Constitution, the states retain plenary power to govern; and

Whereas, despite the clear limitations placed upon it by the United States Constitution, the federal government has steadily expanded its reach into the lives of our citizens and, in so doing, violates the very principles upon which this nation was founded; and

Whereas, the United States Supreme Court has said that states have great latitude in regulating medical care and standards, which have historically and constitutionally been primary state responsibilities and affect areas of core state responsibility, yet Congress and the President are reaching agreement over legislation that will result in the federal government absorbing the regulation of medical care, stripping the states of most responsibility, and taking away the free choice of the citizens of the states; and

Whereas, the federal government has spent trillions of dollars of borrowed money to run deficits, to bail out financial institutions, to prop-up auto makers, and to keep afloat other private enterprises that were mismanaged, took unnecessary risks, or were unresponsive to market demands, thus amassing a debt that will loom over and burden our country for generations to come; and

Whereas, the federal government habitually responds to its annual budget shortfalls by burdening the states with unfunded mandates, shifting costs for programs to the states, limiting state flexibility, and interfering with state revenue systems, undermining the constitutionally created balance between federal and state government; and

Whereas, the United States Supreme Court has ruled that Congress may not simply commandeer the legislative and regulatory processes of the states, and that states may provide their citizens with protections that exceed the protections by the federal government; and

Whereas, the United States Supreme Court has ruled that the United States Constitution allows states to grant rights to their citizens in their state constitutions, beyond rights granted in the federal Constitution; and

Whereas, the United States Supreme Court has recognized that federal law restricting certain rights may be ineffective in denying those rights protected in state Constitutions; and

Whereas, the State recognizes that as an independent sovereign, the State along with the other states of the union took part in an extensive bargaining process through the adoption of the Constitution and the various amendments thereto, and like any other party to any other agreement, the State is bound to uphold the terms and conditions of that agreement. Through this agreement, the states have collectively created the federal government, limiting the scope of its power and authority, as well as ensuring that certain fundamental rights are guaranteed. Also, through this process the federal judiciary has interpreted the Fourteenth Amendment to limit states' governmental authority by providing that important rights and protections afforded by the United States Constitution to the people as citizens of the United States are also extended to each person as a citizen of an individual state. Pursuant to that interpretation, this State is bound to uphold the principles and protections afforded by the Fourteenth Amendment which guarantees the privileges and immunities of the United States, due process of law, and equal protection under the law; and

Whereas, the federal government is considering legislation that may, among other things, obligate residents in South Carolina and other states to purchase health insurance; and

Whereas, the federal government is considering legislation that may, among other things, mandate that this State and other states increase its spending for Medicaid; and

Whereas, the General Assembly of this State reaffirms that the people of this State, have collectively, through the exercise of their authority as citizens of a sovereign state determined the constitutional balance of power in this State; and

Whereas, the citizens of this State have exercised their sovereign authority both directly through the passage of this state's constitution and the amendments thereto and representatively through their duly elected representatives in the General Assembly, and the General Assembly exercises the power of the people without limitation except as provided by the State Constitution; and

Whereas, one of the most fundamental powers of any state in the exercise of its sovereignty is through the power of appropriation and under our state's constitutional balance of power, the power of appropriation is firmly placed within the province of the General Assembly; and

Whereas, the General Assembly rejects any attempt by the federal government, either through the actions of the Congress or the federal courts, to limit, alter, or otherwise affect in any manner whatsoever the General Assembly's sovereign exercise of the power of appropriation; and

Whereas, there is concern that the federal government will also overstep its authority and violate the Tenth and the Second Amendments of the United States Constitution by enacting far-reaching restrictions or even a ban on gun purchases and ownership; and

Whereas, the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution provides: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"; and

Whereas, intervention by an armed South Carolina militia may prove to be the sole means for this State to protect the Liberties guaranteed it and all other states under the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution; and

Whereas, due to the potential need for intervention by an armed South Carolina militia, the protections afforded under the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution are of upmost importance to the Citizens of South Carolina and the State of South Carolina; and

Whereas, it is vitally important for the future of our nation that the states stand against the relentless expansion of the federal government and restore the proper balance to our federal system. Now, therefore,

Be it resolved by the Senate, the House of Representatives concurring:

That the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina, by this resolution, claims for the State of South Carolina sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the United States Constitution.

Be it further resolved that it is the policy of the State of South Carolina that:

No law shall interfere with the right of a person to be treated by or receive services from a health care provider of that person's choice;

No law shall restrict a person's freedom of choice of private health care systems or private health care plans of any type;

No law shall interfere with a person's or an entity's right to pay directly for lawful medical services; and

No law shall impose a tax, penalty, or fine, of any type, for choosing a health care provider, to obtain or decline health care coverage or for participation in any particular health care system or plan.

Be it further resolved that it is the policy of the State of South Carolina that the Attorney General will challenge the constitutionality of any provision enacted by the United States Congress that would violate any of the policies established by this resolution and join with other states that are like-minded to make such a challenge.

Be it further resolved that no state agency, agent, department, instrumentality, or subdivision shall cooperate or participate in any way with any mandate passed by Congress upon notification by the Attorney General that the mandate has been successfully challenged in a court of competent jurisdiction, and further provided that there is not an order to the contrary by a court of competent jurisdiction.

Be it further resolved that the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina, by this resolution, claims for the citizens of South Carolina and the State of South Carolina freedom from all laws and mandates that violate the rights granted under the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Be it further resolved that this resolution serves as notice and demand to the federal government, as South Carolina's agent, to cease and desist immediately all mandates that are beyond the scope of the federal government's constitutionally delegated powers.

Be it further resolved that the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina, by this resolution, affirms its support of the Ninth and Tenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

Be it further resolved that copies of this resolution be forwarded to the President of the United States, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, the President of the United States Senate, and each member of South Carolina's Congressional Delegation, all at Washington, D.C., and to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President of the Senate of the legislatures of the other forty-nine states.


This resolution is in the process of being passed in South Carolina

Essentially the people of South Carolina, which includes me, are telling the federal government, wich includes the FRAUD obama, to not cross the line that is being drawn in South Carolina. South Carolina will assert its authority as a sovereign State.

We are telling obama and the other liberal socialists to back the hell off!



(Obama is trying to blow up his own underwear but he can't quite make it work. For some reason his quest to destory America is on hold. Obama is a frustrated domestic terrorist. His plan to seal America's fate has been stalled. Story Reports)
Victor Davis Hanson

No one likes a serial whiner. It has been a year now — and Obama still blames George W. Bush ad nauseam. He did it in Massachusetts again — and on the eve of the election, no less. Blaming the past for the mistakes of the present gets old quickly. And when one adds in the constant What’s the Matter With Kansas? brand of condescension about naïve yokels not knowing what’s good for them, it gets even worse.

Yet Obama still pontificates that angry deluded voters will “suddenly” come to appreciate how he rammed health care down their otherwise ignorant throats: “The American people will suddenly learn that this bill does things they like and doesn’t do things that people have been trying to say it does. . . . The worst fears will prove groundless. And the American people’s hope for a fair shake from their insurance companies — for quality, affordable health care they need — will finally be realized.”

Good luck with that, O philosopher king!

It is not particularly smart to constantly demonize the entrepreneurial classes, promise to raise income, payroll, health-care, and inheritance taxes on them, and expand government regulations — and then wonder why they are not creating more jobs.

ELMER GANTRY Throughout his life, Gantry continues as a false prophet and finds that his games led to misery.

Devotees turn on false prophets with a special vengeance. Obama is beginning to grate. His flip-the-switch-on, evangelical cadences at rallies sound more like a Harvard nerd doing blues imitations than Martin Luther King Jr. Purple-state presidents don’t appoint Van Joneses and Anita Dunns, or turn the NEA into a quid pro quo Ministry of Approved Culture. A healer doesn’t start in on the “rich,” “Wall Street,” the “big” oil companies, drug companies, insurance companies, or “fat-cat bankers” — especially when he has done his best to shake them all down for campaign money, hire as many of them as he can in his own administration, and arrange cut-rate loans, insider deals, bailouts, and guarantees for all of them.

Obama’s populism is beginning to sound more like a bought boxer who belatedly has second thoughts about throwing the fight he previously contracted. In short, Obama’s ideological presidency hinged on his post-racial, post-national mesmerizing presence that reassured reluctant Democrats to vote against their local constituencies.

(The mesmerizing stupidity of obama. Yes I will admit I am mesmerized by obama. His magnificent no record of achievements dumbfounds me. Story Reports)

If cap-and-trade or health care reform polled below 50 percent, a worried congressional supporter could always call in Him to charm bolting voters. But now? We have in a blink gone from Obama as the bankable 10 percent edge, to Obama as a non-factor, to Obama as a real liability. In short, why vote for an agenda as unpopular as its albatross author?


Obama thought the antidote to “smoke ’em out,” “dead or alive,” and “bring ’em on” braggadocio was bowing to the Saudis, promulgating new and undiscovered great moments in Islamic history, and reaching out to Ahmadinejad as he rounded up and beat down reformers in the streets of Tehran.

It’s one thing to accuse Bush of shredding the Constitution, quite another to adopt his anti-terrorism protocols like tribunals, renditions, Predators, intercepts, and wiretaps. Somehow Obama offended his base by such duplicity, and then his opposition by his tokenism of trashing Bush, promising the architect of 9/11 a show trial a few blocks from the former World Trade Center, and using touchy-feely euphemisms to suggest we are not in a war against terrorism emanating from the radical Islamic world.

Ahmadinejad, Assad, Chávez, the Castro Brothers, Putin, and others for the first six months liked us as much as they had little respect for our sycophancy; now they openly show contempt. We accept that obsequiousness cannot earn respect, but it apparently cannot earn affection either.

The best thing that could happen to Barack Obama is more Democratic losses in hodgepodge elections that might yank away our young transfixed Narcissus from his mesmerizing reflecting pool.

Almost immediately after Obama showed his ideological cards last spring, I suggested in the first weeks of his presidency that the bait-and-switch president would soon face a Carter/Clinton moment in which he could either press on with his polarizing ideology, damage his party for a generation, and eventually end up churlish and sneering at the electorate, who did not appreciate his exalted morality and genius — or triangulate and follow the Dick Morris/Bill Clinton model of talking and acting sort of centrist.

Who knows after Obama’s Scott Brown moment? We now may hear once again the old “no more Red State/Blue State” tropes, the stale campaign promises of presidential vetoes, claims of financial sobriety, the return of a “war on terror,” and smaller government

We’re either down to all that — or Obama’s more principled road to perdition.

An Agenda for Economic Recovery Obama Will Ignore Because He Is Destroying The Economy

The Obama Administration is developing a new socialist constitution for America to replace the original Constitution written by our Founders. Every single one of these huge bills being rammed through congress is simply another article of the Obama constitution which allows no amendments by Republicans.

The people need to understand that these huge 1000 to 2000 page bills – the 111 Congress agenda – are all parts of one master blueprint for a new socialist government. The master plan has been split up into different component pieces so that the people won’t notice how they will all fit back together until after they become law.


Free Enterprise and the 20 Million Jobs Challenge: An Agenda for Economic Recovery”

An Agenda for Economic Recovery

Remarks by
President and CEO, U.S. Chamber of Commerce

Business Council of Alabama Annual Meeting
Birmingham, Alabama

December 4, 2009

The Jobs Challenge

What must we unite around? One urgent priority stands head and shoulders above the rest—creating jobs.

America will need 20 million jobs in the next decade to replace those lost during the recession and to keep up with a growing population.

Alabama will need to create 286,000 of them.

The $64,000 question is—how do we do it? And, who will do it?

It won’t be the government. It can help blunt the sharp edges of a recession, but it can’t create the jobs needed for long-term, sustainable growth. Only the private sector can do that.

However, the government can help by setting the right policies.

(Obama and congress are setting the wrong policies on purpose to destory the economy Story Reports.)

The U.S. Chamber has developed a comprehensive roadmap on how to create the jobs we need for a vibrant economy and a high standard of living.

We sent our ideas to the White House before it held its Jobs Summit yesterday.

Here’s our plan.

Doubling U.S. Exports

It starts by doubling U.S. exports in five years … and then doubling them again.

Don’t forget: 95% of the world’s customers live outside U.S. borders.

What many don’t realize is that America’s markets are among the most open in the world, while other countries hide behind protectionist barriers.

The best way to lower and eliminate those barriers—and create opportunities for American businesses—is through free trade agreements.

We have three excellent agreements being held hostage by special interests in Congress today—Korea, Colombia, and Panama.

These countries are important friends and allies of the United States. Their markets represent huge opportunities for U.S. exporters large and small. In fact, 97% of U.S. exporters are small businesses.

We need to get on with it. These countries will not wait forever. Their patience is wearing thin as we continually move the goalposts for ratification.

In the meantime, they are negotiating deals with our competitors that will give businesses in those countries an advantage over ours.

(This also is part of obama's plan to turn this country into another Haiti. Story Reports)

How does delay make any sense, especially when we desperately need the good-paying jobs generated by exports? It doesn’t.

Recently, the Chamber issued a study which shows that another half-million Americans could soon lose their jobs if we fail to move forward on these trade deals—and, if we continue to insist upon wrong-headed ideas like “Buy American.”

On the other hand, if we approve the Korea agreement, for example, we could boost exports by $10 billion a year and create tens of thousands of jobs. It’s a no-brainer!

And while we insist that foreign markets open themselves up to American goods and services, we must also insist that all agreements are reasonably and fairly enforced—by both parties.

Few states understand the importance of global engagement better than Alabama.

Governor Riley, state agencies, and businesses from all across Alabama have been model partners with TradeRoots, the U.S. Chamber’s national trade education program.

TradeRoots is the nation’s only permanent program to teach Americans from all walks of life about the importance of trade. It also helps small businesses seize export opportunities.

Working together, we have developed the Export Alabama Trade Alliance, which unites key local, regional, and state bodies to promote trade and exports.

And it’s working. From 2004-2007, merchandise exports from Alabama rose almost 60%, beating the national average by 18%.

Today Alabama exports more than $14 billion a year in manufactured goods.

Not only is Alabama exporting more overseas, it is attracting more foreign investment—thanks to smart public policies like low taxes and reasonable regulations.

That’s why companies like ThyssenKrupp, EADS, and Hyundai [HUND-DAY] have chosen to set up shop in your great state.

Thanks to his outstanding leadership, Governor Riley became the first recipient of the TradeRoots International Leadership Award earlier this year.

Other states will need to follow Alabama’s lead if we are to meet our goal of doubling exports in five years.

We can—and must—do it.

Infrastructure Investment

Another major part of our jobs-creating program is to help rebuild and modernize the physical infrastructure of our country.

We can do that by expanding both private and public sector investments in our transportation, energy, water, and broadband systems.

The private sector is prepared to pour billions of dollars into new infrastructure projects if government would clear away many of the costly, time-consuming regulatory, legal, and financial hurdles.

When it comes to public investment, Congress and the White House must not kick the can down the road any further on reauthorizing major highway and transit legislation.

Infrastructure investment is not an elective activity for Congress—it’s a fundamental responsibility.

We’ve known since 2005 that the current highway bill was going to expire last September.

We cannot put it off any longer—not just because it will be a huge jobs creator, but because poor road conditions are a safety hazard, the cost will rise the longer we wait, and planners need certainty when executing complex projects.

And, we simply can’t let the system deteriorate any further.

The latest report by the American Society of Civil Engineers gives our overall system
a “D.” Roads get a “D-.” This is a disgrace and completely unacceptable.

This is primarily a problem of political will … and the Chamber is here to make sure members of Congress summon the courage to do the right thing, and do it quickly.

Healthy Capital Markets

One of the largest complaints you hear from small businesses is the current lack of credit.

If they don’t have credit, how do they make the investments needed to create jobs and help get the economy moving again?

For generations, America has been better than any other country at connecting an investor and a person with a new idea.

We must strengthen this system with intelligent regulations while avoiding harmful new rules that will hinder innovation and job creation.

We must also recognize that current policy discussions in Washington are adding to the uncertainty that discourages financial institutions from lending and businesses from investing.

(Let me add this is done by obama on purpose to destroy the US economy. Story Reports)

Capital is the seed corn of every small business and at the heart of the creation of every single job. We need to strengthen our capital markets and make them the most competitive, transparent, attractive, and fair in the world.

One thing that would help accomplish that would be too restrain excessive spending.

This administration’s budget would increase the cumulative federal deficit by nearly $9.3 trillion over the next 10 years. By 2019, the level of debt held by the public would reach an astronomical 82% of GDP.

Where will it stop? When will it end?

Projected budget deficits are clearly unsustainable, and could drain capital markets of funds that are badly needed for innovation, new business start-ups, and other job-creating investments.

(Again I repeat obama is destroying our economy on purpose. It it obvious. Story Reports.)

Taxes, Regulations, and Lawsuits

Alabama has learned a valuable lesson that folks in Washington sometimes don’t grasp—if you want businesses to create jobs, opportunities, and prosperity, then politicians need to help create the right environment.

This is especially true when it comes to taxes, regulations, and lawsuits.

Under current plans, American entrepreneurs will see their taxes rise well beyond today’s high rates.

Unless Congress acts, a wide range of further automatic tax hikes will take place next year.

Can anyone think of worst time to increase taxes?

(Again I repeat obama is doing this to destroy the US economy on purpose. Story Reports.)

In fact, if we let the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts expire, it will result in the largest tax increase in U.S. history by several orders of magnitude.

Instead, we must begin retooling the tax code to reward achievement, encourage investment, and compete globally.

Congress is also weighing a slew of burdensome new rules, regulations, and mandates. And they hardly ever pass up an opportunity to help the trial bar create new lawsuits.

When you add it all up, the combined burden of such requirements could not only damage new job creation, but also jeopardize existing jobs.

(The US chamber of commerce knows obama is destroying the economy. I know he is doing it on purpose. Story Reports.)

Education and Workforce

But creating new jobs is not enough. We must have adequately trained workers to fill them.

Nearly a third of American students fail to graduate from high school, and those who do are often ill-prepared for college or jobs in the modern economy.

It’s time to refocus on the basics of learning, while also reforming our training programs so that they prepare workers for jobs that are actually going to exist.

We must change the way we train our teachers, strengthen standards and accountability in the classroom, and encourage a spirit of innovation throughout our education system.

We’ve seen some encouraging signs from the administration on this issue. It’s “Race to the Top” grant program could be a major catalyst for education innovation across the country and we strongly support it.

Other Agenda Items

That’s our agenda for creating 20 million jobs in the next decade.

On top of that, there are some other things we should do if they can be done right.

For example, the U.S. Chamber is fighting for a good health care bill … one that expands affordable coverage, truly reduces costs, reforms our broken medical malpractice system, and preserves and strengthens the employer-provided system.

But we don’t like what we’re seeing from Congress. For example, in the Senate they say their bill would actually reduce the deficit.

If you believe that, I’ve got some land across the way in Florida I’d like to sell you!

We’re fighting for a sensible energy bill and an international climate change agreement that will reduce global emissions; provide an abundant supply of affordable, diverse, and clean energy; and spur the development and deployment of technology—without bankrupting our economy.

Unfortunately, the House hasn’t passed anything like that, and the Senate isn’t likely to, either.

The Waxman-Markey bill would create a massive federal bureaucracy with nearly 400 new regulations and more than 1,000 new mandates.

It would drive up energy costs, reduce GDP, and do little to ensure that renewable or alternative energy sources would be brought online quickly enough to replace the fossil-based energy it restricts.

It’s a bad bill and we were right to oppose it.

We’re advocating for reasonable, clear, and common sense reforms to financial regulations … regulations that provide investor protections, untangle the thicket of overlapping agencies, reduce the multiple layers of regulation, and strengthen our capital markets.

We’re also fighting against some things …

We’re opposing any legislation that will delay economic recovery …

We’re fighting big labor’s agenda to turn back the clock in this country 50 years, starting with card check …

After we thwarted their bill in the Senate, the unions came back knocking on doors with a compromise.

They said, OK, maybe we won’t end the secret ballot in unionization votes, but let’s have binding arbitration where a government arbitrator from Washington could come into your company and ram a first contract down your throat.

Our answer to that is not just “no,” but “hell no!”

And we’re opposing unprecedented levels of government spending, taxes, debts, and regulations.

(Again it is obvious obama and congress are destroying the US economy on purpose and the chamber knows this. They can't say this but I can. Obama is a traitor. Story Reports.)

I could give a separate speech on each of these topics, but I won’t. I’ll look forward to any questions you might have about them during the discussion period.

Free Enterprise Makes It Possible

There is one thing we absolutely must do if we hope to revitalize our economy, create jobs, provide opportunities to our citizens, and remain a global leader … Commit ourselves to a free enterprise system.

A system based on freedom of choice and individual initiative, with open trade, free capital markets, and reasonable levels of taxation and regulation.

Only a strong private sector powered by free enterprise can create the 20 million jobs we need.

(Obama knows this and he is doing everything he can to destroy the private sector. Obama is responsible for thousands of people losing jobs and thousands of people not being able to get jobs. Obama wants people to suffer. He does not care about the free market. Obama only wants to make Americans dependent on the government for everything. He really does want to turn America into another Haiti. Story Reports.)

That’s why the Chamber has launched a positive, forward looking campaign to defend, protect, and advance the free enterprise system.

We must create a political imperative where any time an elected official makes a decision or casts a vote, he or she stops to weigh its impact on the economic system so vital to our prosperity.

Free enterprise built the strongest economy and the greatest country the world has ever known. It can lead us to an even brighter future.

We hope we can count on your continued support as we move this campaign forward in an effort to win the hearts of minds of our fellow citizens.


The compelling need for economic recovery is why free enterprise is so important, and why your new partnership is so important.

The business community must stand together on the big issues.

Your partnership will make you an even more powerful force in Alabama. You’ll soon find that when you are at the top of the flagpole there is no one else to shoot at.

The Chamber learned this lesson recently when we started pushing back against the forces who thought that they had bought themselves a government.

Which is why it’s more important than ever that we stick together. That we fight for what we believe in. That we do so with high integrity. That we confront our adversaries with facts and good manners and never back down from what we know is right.

We’ll never claim that free enterprise is a perfect system, just the best one ever devised by man. It has helped lift hundreds of millions out of poverty around the world and holds the key to our future prosperity.

It is worth keeping. It is worth fighting for.

It deserves our greatest passion, our highest level of commitment, and all of the energy we can muster.

I’m optimistic about America’s future. I can’t help it, I’m Irish.

I’m optimistic we’ll emerge from this recession stronger than ever …

I’m optimistic that we can and will tackle the big challenges before us just as Americans of past generations tackled theirs …

I’m optimistic that given a fair chance an individual with an idea, a lot of hard work, and a little luck can achieve the American Dream … and if he or she tries and fails, they can get right back up and try again.

I’m even optimistic that the Crimson Tide will defeat the Gators tomorrow in the SEC Championship game—Roll Tide!

All of these things are possible if we preserve the free enterprise system and if we stick together.

Thank you very much.

The US Chamber of Commerce knows obama is DESTROYING the free enterprise system. The chamber represents businesses that represent the free enterprise system. This is why they talk about preserving the free enterprise system. It isn't about obama and congress making bad laws or don't know what they are doing. Its all done on purpose to "spead the wealth around" and destroy the free eneterprise system. America must fight for our freedoms. Obama and the democratic controlled congress have become the "enemy" of free enterprise and therefore the enemy of American's freedom. Americans who love their freedom and have been willing to fight and die for freedom know this. We will resist and fight for freedom as we have done in the past. Our enemies are foreign and domestic. More domestic than foreign. The Enemies are obama and liberal socialist democrates. Obama will say anything to appease anyone. Obama is a pathological liar who lies incessantly to get his way and does so with little concern for others. Obama is a fear monger. Story Reports)


Obama is destroying the US economy and the US Chamber of Commerce Exposes The Deception

Obama explained. He is certainly a pathological liar. He also is a compulsive liar. What he says and does most of the time are not the same.

Pathological Liar

A pathological liar is usually defined as someone who lies incessantly to get their way and does so with little concern for others. Pathological lying is often viewed as coping mechanism developed in early childhood and it is often associated with some other type of mental health disorder. A pathological liar is often goal-oriented (i.e., lying is focused - it is done to get one's way). Pathological liars have little regard or respect for the rights and feelings of others. A pathological liar often comes across as being manipulative, cunning and self-centered.
What is the Difference Between a Pathological, a Compulsive, a Chronic, and a Habitual Liar?

Pathological Liar

A pathological liar is usually defined as someone who lies incessantly to get their way and does so with little concern for others. Pathological lying is often viewed as coping mechanism developed in early childhood and it is often associated with some other type of mental health disorder. A pathological liar is often goal-oriented (i.e., lying is focused - it is done to get one's way). Pathological liars have little regard or respect for the rights and feelings of others. A pathological liar often comes across as being manipulative, cunning and self-centered.

Compulsive Liar

A compulsive liar is defined as someone who lies out of habit. Lying is their normal and reflexive way of responding to questions. Compulsive liars bend the truth about everything, large and small. For a compulsive liar, telling the truth is very awkward and uncomfortable while lying feels right. Compulsive lying is usually thought to develop in early childhood, due to being placed in an environment where lying was necessary. For the most part, compulsive liars are not overly manipulative and cunning (see, Pathological Liar), rather they simply lie out of habit - an automatic response which is hard to break and one that takes its toll on a relationship (see, how to cope with a compulsive liar).

The terms Habitual Liar and Chronic Liar are often used to refer to a Compulsive Liar.
Victor Davis Hanson

Obama in his narcissism thought his sonorous rhetoric made him exempt from a “read my lips” or “I didn’t have sex with that woman” moment. It didn’t.

People heard his serial promises about airing the health-care debate on C-SPAN, his new-transparency/no-lobbyist vows, and his monotonous boasts to close down Guantanamo within a year. All that is now “inoperative.” The problem was not just that Obama made promises that he broke, but that he made them so frequently and so vehemently — and so cavalierly broke them. That brazen campaign deception is problematic for a politician, but proves fatal for a self-appointed messiah.

The U.S. Constitution 2.0, The Obama Rewrite

Why the Great and Growing Backlash?

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Revolution 2010

The canary in the democratic coal mine of obama has just died. Democrates nationwide ignore this at their own peril. Obama has become a lethal political gas that killed the canary in the democratic coal mine. Obama is a LETHAL BO.

Every statewide candidate the "lethal BO" has campaigned for has been defeated. Not only has obama been a disaster for the US economy obama is also a political disaster for democrates. Many democrates will not continue to "cling" to BO.

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Obama is a failure again Brown elected in mass

How many people will die because Barack Obama’s White House is incompetent?

"This is monumental. This is epic," said former Massachusets Gov. Mitt Romney. "This is the people of Massachusets telling Obama they've had enough of him."

"It is a revolution," said Fox News analyst Stuart Varney. "Health care is dead. Cap and trade is dead."

Republicans have occasionally been a political force in state politics, Massachusetts voters have not sent a Republican to represent them in the U.S. Senate since 1972. Every member of the state delegation currently in Washington is a Democrat. Democrats also outnumber Republicans 3-to-1 in the state – 37 percent of registered voters are Democrats, 12 percent are Republicans and 51 percent are unaffiliated. Obama won the state by 26 percentage points in the 2008 presidential election.

Kennedy, who died in August, held his Senate seat for 47 years.

(So what does this mean for obama? The voters of Mass have just told obama he is a failure. They don't like his leadership. They want obamacare stopped. Obama of course is liberal stupid and will keep destroying himself and the democratic party.)

Obama has made a group of democrates drink the jim jones kool aid and commit political suicide. Obama has a group of democrates who are willing to do this. Obama is the "jim jones" of the democratic party.

I hear many democrate voters saying obama has not been given a chance to succeed. Congress is totally controlled by the democrates. Democratic president, democratic senate, and democrate house. How much more does obama need to succeed? He has been given total control of congress yet he is a TOTAL FAILURE!

This is just a excuse for the EPIC FAILURE of the "first black president".

The canary in the democratic coal mine of obama has just died. Democrates nationwide ignore this at their own peril. Obama has become a lethal political gas that killed the canary in the democratic coal mine. Obama is a LETHAL BO.

Every statewide candidate the "lethal BO" has campaigned for has been defeated. Not only has obama been a disaster for the US economy obama is also a political disaster for democrates. Many democrates will not continue to "cling" to BO.

(BO is laughing gas to me. Obama has become a real clown. He is so arrogant and condescending every time he speaks it just like a standup comedian. His words fail him if he speaks "off the cuff". Entertainment via obama the clown. His clown is called "failure".
Clowns play our shadows. Clowns play the parts of us that are weak and stupid and vain and vulnerable. Failure is inevitable for "failure the clown" BHO. Bo wants to create the clown state via obamacare. Its just another day of abject failure at clown school for Americans to observe. Barack obama the clown president.) Story Reports

Obama’s Unicorn of Hope and Change Died Under the Weight of Ted Kennedy’s Ego

Erick Erickson

In Massachusetts, Barack Obama’s unicorn of hope and changed died under the weight of Ted Kennedy’s ego. The left gets angry when it is pointed out, but it is an objective fact.

Once Kennedy’s condition became terminal, he could have resigned his seat in favor of an appointment or special election. Instead, the Democrats and Kennedy decided he should martyr himself to advance socialized medicine in America. Had he resigned before the health care debate began, the Republican victory in Massachusetts would be a myth. Instead, it is now a reality. Yes, you can credit Ted Kennedy with killing health care, not just Mary Jo Kopechne.

ObamaCare was on life support. Scott Brown just removed its feeding tube thanks to Ted Kennedy.

There are ten other things to take away from Scott Brown’s victory:

1. Someone needs to ask Keith Olbermann, David Shuster, and the Democrats how the teabags taste.

2. Scott Brown should give the Republican response to Barack Obama’s State of the Union speech next week. From his truck.

2. Centrist Democrats are running away from health care deform as fast as possible now. As Evan Bayh (D-IN) said, if Massachusetts is not a wake up call, there is no waking up for the Democrats.

3. The GOP has as much to worry about from Scott Brown’s victory as the Democrats do. Consider this: Brown ran against the DC Republican establishment as much as the Democrat establishment. When the DC Republicans put in their $500,000.00 after the tea party had already raised Brown millions, they did so quietly and under the radar. Contrast that with Jim DeMint, who publicly endorsed Brown and used the Senate Conservatives Fund as a vessel to rally conservative activists for Scott Brown very publicly.

4. Jim DeMint said health care was Barack Obama’s Waterloo. Yup. And the people of Massachusetts delivered the decisive blow. Today we may have to start calling DeMint “Wellington.” He, not the GOP, has beaten Obama like a drum on health care.

5. Like it or not — Mitt Romney: Winner. But the health care issue in Massachusetts could be a serious vulnerability for him in light of the voters of Massachusetts who have the Democrats’ universal health care dream have voted for the candidate opposed to expanding that “dream” to the nation.

6. There are a number of liberal Democrats tonight who are thinking the following: force health care through, take the hit in November, then expect every election from here on out to be about problems with health care — the Democrats will, in every case, be able and willing to outbid the GOP thereby creating a permanent Democratic majority. They will try it if they can. The GOP must not get overconfident of a health care deform defeat.

7. Little noticed bit of Scott Brown trivia: he polled better on the issue of “enemy combatants” than on health care. Voters really do not trust the Democrats on national security and it is growing in the conscience of voters as a very real issue.

8. How many people will die because Barack Obama’s White House is incompetent? This is not hyperbole. No competent White House would spend political capital on a trip to Europe to sell the Olympics without a guarantee it would happen. No competent White House would spend political capital two days before an election viewed as a referendum on the President of the United States with the President’s candidate’s poll numbers cratering. If the White House is not competent in spending the President’s political capital, how the heck can it be competent to save American lives?

9. The Left tells us the nation is now ungovernable. Actually, the allegedly ungovernable citizenry just told those attempting to govern to go to hell.

10. In 2008, Independent voters voted for Obama to prove they were not the racist bigots the media and Democrats hypothesized they were. Ever since, Independents have been voting against Obama to prove they also are not socialists.

BONUS NUMBER 11: A year ago today, Barack Obama was sworn in as President of the United States. Today, he wakes up rejected by the independents who elected him and a social pariah within the Democrat Party. Outside of the Congressional Black Caucus and a handful of far left seats in Congress, it is hard, this morning, to imagine any Democrat wanting Barack Obama to go out on the campaign trail. Every statewide candidate for whom Obama has campaigned since his election has lost.


Um Um Um Barack Hussein Obama (Obama The Magnificent FAILURE.) The democrate rats are starting to jump from the ship because they know the obama Titanic ship of failure is sinking fast. Obama will go down with the ship of failure. This is what a good "captain narcissist" should do. Obama should give a shout out, to all his minions , abandon ship! abandon ship! (Story Reports)

Bill Clinton was a cameleon. Obama is also but does not have the twisted logic of bill clinton. Bill clinton knew when to change course. Obama being the person he is will not change course as the American people demand. Therefore obama will sink his own ship. This is because he is a narcissist and a loser.

On Jan 20, 2009 at the moment obama became the fraud president, obama even screwed up the oath. Yes it was obama that first screwed up the oath. This was a picture of his fruitless efforts to come. It’s only a 35 word oath. This should have been memorized by obama. Obama stumbles at the stating block of his success failure.

ROBERTS: I, Barack Hussein Obama...
OBAMA: I, Barack... (Obama screws up the oaf of office at the beginning.)
ROBERTS: ... do solemnly swear...
OBAMA: I, Barack Hussein Obama, do solemnly swear...
ROBERTS: ... that I will execute the office of president to the United States faithfully...
OBAMA: ... that I will execute... (Obama screws up again and can't repeat the sentence.)
ROBERTS: ... faithfully the office of president of the United States...
OBAMA: ... the office of president of the United States faithfully...
ROBERTS: ... and will to the best of my ability...
OBAMA: ... and will to the best of my ability...
ROBERTS: ... preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.
OBAMA: ... preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.
ROBERTS: So help you God?
OBAMA: So help me God.
ROBERTS: Congratulations, Mr. President. (Congradulations to the fraud.)

Obama was elected by "the cult of personality" and political correctness via racism and "white guilt". This bo cult was used by the state run liberal media to elect a fraud.

A cult of personality arises when a country's leader uses mass media to create an idealized and heroic public image, often through unquestioning flattery and praise. Cults of personality are often found in dictatorships and Stalinist governments.

A cult of personality is similar to general hero worship, except that it is created specifically for political leaders. However, the term may be applied by analogy to refer to adulation of religious or non-political leaders.

Obama quotes:

“When you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.”

From Audacity of Hope: 'I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.'

This quote reveals who obama the fraud is and what he will defend. Obama will DEFEND terrorists muslims. He said so in his book. He did not say terrorists because any terrorist that is a muslim doesn't matter to him. If he or she is a muslim obama will defend them. This is what he is doing. Obama is a traitor and should be tried and impeached for treason.

I actually think the bottom is falling out for Murther Coakley

Pick-up truck to run over Coakley in the election today. Coakley, obama made fun of browns pick-up truck just because he drove a truck. This is how STUPID and elitist these LIBERAL CLOWNS are. They still don't know that the American people have turned against them.

A new InsiderAdvantage poll conducted exclusively for POLITICO shows Republican Scott Brown holding a 9-point advantage over Martha Coakley a day before Massachusetts voters trek to the ballot box to choose a new senator.

According to the survey conducted Sunday evening by the non-partisan firm, Brown leads the Democratic attorney general 52 percent to 43 percent.

"I actually think the bottom is falling out," said InsiderAdvantage CEO Matt Towery, referring to Coakley's fall in the polls over the last ten days. "I think that this candidate is in freefall. Clearly this race is imploding for her."

The numbers show males and independents overwhelmingly breaking for Brown, who has married his GQ looks with a populist tone in a pick-up truck on the campaign trail.

Brown holds a 15-point lead among males and crushes Coakley by 41 points among self-described independents, a group that's been steadily inching away from the Democratic party over the last year due to growing apprehension with government spending, bailouts and health care reform.

"Men are not going to vote for Coakley at all. You have a very angry male voter who's repudiating whatever is being said in Washington and they're taking it out on this woman. And independents are clearly going to the Republican in droves. What's left are the Democratic voters," said Towery, who is a former aide to Newt Gingrich.

And the survey shows almost a quarter of Democratic voters lining up with Brown.

(Maybe Coakley would have done better if she drove a pick-up truck.)SR

"We're about to learn whether Obama can deliver electoral votes," wrote DailyKos founder Markos Moulitsas on his Twitter page.

(I don't think so, obama can't deliver anything else. I don't think he could even deliver pizza.) Story Reports

"When there's a nine-point difference, it's awfully hard to shave off enough to win," Towery said. "The older voters are even tied. And the youngest voters have turned against the Democrats," he said, pointing to Brown's 61 to 30 percent lead among voters 18 to 29 years old. (Voters 65 and older, typically a key Democratic constituency, are divided between the two contenders, 48 percent a piece).

(This is really a vote AGAINST obama and he know it. Better hurry up barry and do you dirty work.)

nsiderAdvantage's polling pool was made up of 20 percent Republicans and 43 percent of Democrats, though estimates show that independents make up just over 50 percent of all Massachusetts voters. "It'd be even worse for (Coakley) if we weighed it towards more independents," Towery said.

Other election eve polling is also tracking towards Brown. The Republican pollster, American Research Group, pins Brown's lead at 7 points, 52 to 45 percent, in a three-day survey released Monday. Public Policy Polling's final survey put Brown up 51 to 46 percent, a lead that falls within the margin of error.

"If this race were to tight up, he might make the difference," said Towery. "But this is a disaster (for Democrats)," he said.

The margin of error for the InsiderAdvantage poll is +/- 3.4 percent. About three percent registered no opinion.

(Obma is a DISASTER for democrats. THIS IS THE REAL STORY!)

Monday, January 18, 2010

I Had A Dream Obama Was Exposed As A Fraud

I Had A Dream By Story Reports.

I had a dream that people exposed to daily mass media and local media lies can rise above the cesspool of FRAUD that is Barack Hussein Obama and his comrades. WE THE PEOPLE must overcome the race card that is being played daily by the ace of race Barack Hussein Obama. Our society has become lost as a self sufficient people. Our oppression as a free people will only cease when the truth is exposed about Barack Hussein Obama. Intimidation and the ignorance of those who would opress our freedoms can be overcome by not kowtowing to race baters and liers. I had a dream that one day soon we will stand together to expose Barack Hussein Obama for the FRAUD he is. Along the way they may try to stop us by shouting, talking louder over us, not listening and calling us racists when in fact any time the race card is played it is played by a racist black or white. The Ace of Race is Barack Hussein Obama. He is the race card personafied. Instead of building this nation up like Ronald Reagan did, he tears it down using racial verbage. Not only is Barack Hussein Obama a fraud in fact he is also a racist. Obama Quotes:

From Dreams of My Father: 'I ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites.'

From Dreams of My Father: 'I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother's race.'

From Dreams of My Father: 'There was something about him that made me wary, a little too sure of himself, maybe. And white.'

From Dreams of My Father: ; 'It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names.'

From Dreams of My Father: 'I never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn't speak to my own. It was into my father's image, the black man, son of Africa, that I'd packed all the attributes I sought in myself, the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, Dubois and Mandela.'

(Note obama admits here he wanted to be like malcom X.) All these people who obama wants to emulate are media creations as he is.) The facts are pushed aside for fiction.

From Audacity of Hope: 'I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.'

I had a dream Barack Hussein Obama would some day soon be exposed as an illegal alien. Some will point to his Certificate of Hawaiian Birth as evidence he is a US citizen but this is a fallacy as explained by Robert Reece Below.

The article written by Robert Reece exposes Obama as a fraud!

Obama's Birth Certificate - The devil's in the details

Obama's "birth certificate" - the devil's in the details

The “Certificate of Hawaiian Birth” is a portion of the Hawaiian “birth certificate” program that family members may have used to register a young Barack Obama as a US Citizen, during the era Hawaii was transitioning from being a US territory to statehood.

For the purposes of this article, it should be noted that there are several different types of "birth certificates" that Hawaii uses to show proof of birth:

- Certification of Live Birth
- Certificate of Live Birth
- Certificate of Delayed Birth
- Certificate of Hawaiian Birth

Another very important point to note is that a “Certification of Live Birth” is an abbreviated version of the birth record on file with the Hawaiian Department of Health. The root document(s), could be: a) a true “Certificate of Live Birth”; b) a “Late Birth Certificate” with or without modifications; or c) a “Certificate of Hawaiian Birth.”

To be distinct and precise in terminology, there is no official document called a “birth certificate” in Hawaii. The term is loosely used to describe a certificated proof of birth. (In fact, if you take a look at your “birth certificate” that you may have tucked away in a safe place, it probably says, “Certificate of Live Birth” at the very top of the form.)

The “Certificate of Live Birth,” sometimes called the “long form,” or “vault copy” birth certificate shows details such as the hospital, doctor or midwife’s names, witness signatures, etc. This, by the way, is what John McCain released earlier in the year to the general public:

Since this summer, Obama has shown the “Certification of Live Birth” on his website.

The computer-generated “Certification of Live Birth” is used by the state of Hawaii IN LIEU OF the “Certificate of Live Birth,” or if originally filed, a “Delayed Certificate of Birth,” or even a “Certificate of Hawaiian Birth.” For verification purposes, however, the “Certification of Live Birth” does not indicate which birth record “root document(s)” that the Certification is based upon.

Hawaiian “birth certificate” history

Few official birth certificates existed at the turn of the century, and the few that were filed may have listed only the person’s first name. Hawaiian law established the “Certificate of Hawaiian Birth” program in 1911. The program permitted a person born in Hawaii who was one year or older, and whose birth had not been previously registered in Hawaii, to be registered by a family or guardian. Hawaii had just been annexed in 1898 and was a US territory, so documenting residents made sense. With families moving between the islands, or having children without the aid of a hospital or doctor, the “Certificate of Hawaiian Birth” allowed the new territory to capture names for census, voting, property ownership and of course, taxation. The “Certificate of Hawaiian Birth” application was a very basic form which was little more than a personal affidavit and might have little if any verifiable info of the birth. For example, Sun Yat-sen, Chinese revolutionary and political leader often referred to as the “Father of Modern China,” was able to file a “Certificate of Hawaiian Birth” application and immigrate to the US in 1904 using the form.
Once processed, Sun Yat-sen’s application became a true "Certificate of Hawaiian Birth":

As the decades passed, the “Certificate of Hawaiian Birth” Application and Certification process became more formalized. For example, this is the 1946 “Certificate of Hawaiian Birth” application from Masayoshi Mitose, credited for having brought Kenpo martial arts to the US in the 1930s:
As is evident on Mitose’s supplemental data seems to indicate, the more detailed the support documentation, the greater likelihood the certificate would be accepted by the Secretary of Hawaii, and later, the Department of Health.

When Hawaii became a state in 1959, there were many people residing there who may not have had a filed birth certificate, but did possess a “Certificate of Hawaiian Birth.” Any person to whom a “Certificate of Hawaiian Birth” had been issued could request to amendment, including a legal change of name, via a “Late Birth Certificate.”

By applying for a “Late Birth Certificate” issued in lieu of a “Certificate of Hawaiian Birth,” changes could be made to the official records of that person that were filed using the previously-submitted form. The “Late Birth Certificate” would be treated more like the more-legitimate “Certificate of Live Birth,” even though several years may have passed, memories faded and accounts changed regarding the events surrounding the birth.

To make changes to the “birth certificate” on file, an applicant would be required to submit documentary evidence of the birth facts, often in the form of a questionnaire and affidavits, to support the registration of the “Late Certificate of Birth.” On a small island, in a time devoid of computers and databases, verification was a little harder to come by than today. Also almost like a small town, people knew each other and were probably not highly suspicious of forgery or incomplete birth records.

Once approved, the “Late Birth Certificate” would be registered in the official birth records in place of the “Certificate of Hawaiian Birth.” Under existing policy, the “Certificate of Hawaiian Birth” and supplementary data would then be surrendered to the Department of Health, assumedly to be archived.

The “Certificate of Hawaiian Birth” Program was terminated in 1972 when, among other reasons, the law required the U.S. Social Security Administration to issue Social Security numbers and to obtain more stringent evidence of age and citizenship or alien status and identity. It is not publically known how many citizens possess the “Certificate of Hawaiian Birth,” or how many people used Hawaiian law to modify their birth records to reflect a “Certificate of Delayed Birth” on file in place of the previous form.

American citizenship has always been seen as being highly sought after for political freedom and economic opportunity. Laws similar the “Certificate of Hawaiian Birth” existed for Guam and other American territories.

By today’s standards, compared to the “Certificate of Hawaiian Birth” era of non-computerized record keeping of 1972 and before, it would seem relatively difficult to “slip in” using Hawaiian law to prove US Citizenship, especially if the child had not be born on Hawaii.

However, even today’s Hawaiian state law provides for the issuance of “birth certificates” if the child is born out of state, and potentially out of the US, as long as the legal parents can show Hawaii as their legal residence:

[§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State.
(a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child. (emphasis added)

How this affects Barack Obama

Barack Obama, born in 1961, has shown the world his “short form birth certificate,” or “Certification of Live Birth”:

A very important point to note is that a “Certification of Live Birth” is an abbreviated version of the birth record on file with the Hawaiian Department of Health. The root document(s), could be: a) a true “Certificate of Live Birth”; b) a “Late Birth Certificate” with or without modifications; or c) a “Certificate of Hawaiian Birth.”

A “Certification of Live Birth” may reflect data that had been changed over time, and does not provide corroborated testimony such as dates, locations, change in paternal identification, and witnesses. Any record that amendments had been submitted and information changed is not shown on the “Certification of Live Birth,” which is laser printed on special green stock paper, and lacks detailed information that would be expected from a true “Certificate of Hawaiian Birth,” or “Certificate of Delayed Birth.”

Recent Statements Regarding Obama's "Birth Certificate"

Knowing the intricacies of the Hawaiian “birth certificate” adds mystery instead of resolution with Obama birth record critics, especially when applied to statements provided by Hawaiian officials before the Presidential election.

On Oct. 31, after being inundated by requests for more details about Obama’s birth records, Department of Health Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino said she and registrar of vital statistics, Alvin Onaka, had personally verified that the Health Department possesses Obama's original birth certificate.

"Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures," Fukino said.

The cryptic and carefully-worded statement offered no true details of the “birth certificate,” and leads to more questions than answers among critics. In July, when Barack Obama’s Certification of Live Birth” was first distributed publically on the internet, Hawaiian Department of Health spokeswoman Janice Okubo simply asserted to the St. Petersburg Times, “it’s a valid Hawaii state birth certificate.”

Although officials are on record that there is an original “birth certificate” held by the state, and that it is correctly filed according to Hawaii state directives. However, the specifics of the type of “birth certificate” records on file, with modifications, as well as the details and accounts of witnesses, is still unknown at this time.

Credibility of the " Certification of Live Birth"

The computer-generated “Certification of Live Birth” was first used in November 2001 to allow the State of Hawaii to pull up birth records quicker for people requesting a “birth certificate” in person. At the very bottom of the form are the words, “This copy serves as prima facia evidence of the fact of birth in any court proceeding.” [HRS 338-13(b), 338-19]."

However, despite this written notice on the form, some Hawaii state agencies do not accept the “Certification of Live Birth” as irrefutable verification of Hawaiian birth. There have been numerous cases when the Hawaii Family Court System required more detailed data for paternity suits. Additionally, the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands provides the following guidelines to Hawaiian natives applying for Hawaiian Home Lands homestead:

The primary documents used to show you are of age and a qualified native Hawaiian are:
- A certified copy of Certificate of Birth;
- A certified copy of Certificate of Hawaiian Birth, including testimonies; or
- A certified copy of Certificate of Delayed Birth.

“In order to process your application, DHHL utilizes information that is found only on the original Certificate, which is either black or green. This is a more complete record of your birth than the Certification of Live Birth (a computer-generated printout). Submitting the original Certificate will save you time and money since the computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by DHHL.”
(emphasis added)

Additionally, the “Certification of Live Birth” is not recognized by many Federal agencies. DoD 5220.22-M, the "National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual," provides baseline standards for the protection of classified information released or disclosed from the military, Department of Energy, and other agencies, to industry. Section 2-208states that acceptable certificates must show that the birth record was filed shortly after birth. If a “Delayed Birth Certificate” is on file, it must be supported by secondary evidence of birth, such as baptismal or circumcision certificates, hospital birth records, or affidavits of persons having personal knowledge about the facts of birth.

Even to work at the Navy Ship Yard in Pearl Harbor, the August 2008 version of the, “Unified Facilities Guide Specifications,” section allows for a total of 18 different means to verify US citizenship, ranging from a military ID card to even a “Hawaii certificate of foreign birth.” The “Certification of Live Birth” is not on the list of approved documents acceptable for proof of Citizenship.

Persisting questions and Constitutional Problems

Although some vetting took place in summer 2008 after Barrack Obama’s “Certification of Live Birth,” most media outlets and online bloggers failed to explore the unique aspects and varieties of Hawaiian “birth certificates.” Unfortunately, the birth certificate issue may cause a Constitutional crisis if Obama is determined to be other than a “Natural Born Citizen,” as Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the US Constitution requires.

One potential problem might involve a name change to “Barry Soetoro” when attending elementary school in Indonesia, which may have occurred if there was an amendment in Obama’s birth record. Some accounts of Obama’s youth indicate his name may have been changed to. A name change would also need to be legally registered in court.

Verbal accounts by some of Obama’s family reportedly indicate Obama’s birthplace was either Kapiolani or Queens Hospital in Hawaii on Aug. 8, 1961. However, no birthing records reportedly can be found in either of the two hospitals, and no records seem to exist that list Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, as a patient at either hospital. Also, no medical staff has come forward to offer affidavits of Obama’s birth. A birth announcement appeared in the Aug. 13, 1963 edition of the Honolulu Advertiser, however, it’s not definitive if the announcement was placed by the Department of Vital Statistics or a family member. If the latter is true, it’s plausible that Obama and mother may not have been on the island at the time of birth.

Depending on the events and timing, the “birth certificate” issue could impact the outcome of the Presidential election if Obama’s records are incomplete and do not match the name on Certified ballots. State Secretary of State laws differ on this subject, but could have an effect on Electoral Collage delegates and how they might be allowed to vote on Dec. 15.

At this time, at least 17 lawsuits are pending in various state and federal courts. Additionally, it’s been rumored online that some Electoral College delegates may make requests to see details of Obama’s birth records. Some court cases are destined to be dismissed, while others may lead to a final show-down between Obama and his birth certificate critics.

According to a lawsuit by Philip Berg that is before the Supreme Court on appeal, Berg states that Obama’s mother was in Kenya during her pregnancy, and was prevented from flying back to Hawaii because of flight restrictions to prevent births in flight. Berg alleges Obama’s paternal grandmother, half-brother, and half-sister have stated that Obama was born in Kenya. Shortly after giving birth, Obama’s mother flew to Hawaii to register the birth. Justice Souter dismissed the case on Nov. 3. However, Supreme Court rules state that “any brief in opposition shall be filed within 30 days after the case is placed on the docket.” All parties, the Democratic National Committee, the Federal Elections Committee, Obama, and others are to respond to the court case dismissed by the Third Circuit by December 1.

Additional credibility issues arise depending on the details of Obama’s “vault copy” birth certificate and how it would hold up to a Constitutional challenge of Natural Born Citizenship. As former Ambassador and 2008 Presidential candidate Alan Keyes outlines in his pending lawsuit with the California Secretary of State: “a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth was the result of the uncorroborated testimony of one witness and was not generated by a hospital. Such a Certificate could be obtained up to one year from the date of the child’s birth. For that reason, its value as prima facie evidence is limited and could be overcome if any of the allegations of substantial evidence of birth outside Hawaii can be obtained.”

In a lesser-known case with potentially earth shattering consequences, the US Supreme Court is set to have a closed-door Conference to evaluate if they wish to further explore the Constitutional-status of Barack Obama, John McCain and Roger Calero as Natural Born Citizens. In contrast to Keyes case and more than a dozen cases pending on the Presidential election, Leo C. Donofrio uniquely alleges Obama’s dual citizenship status at birth with the US and Kenya is prohibited by the Framers of the Constitution because of their concern of “divided loyalties” and “foreign influence.” The case of Donofrio vs. the New Jersey Secretary of State, has the potential to put the final election results on hold, leading up to Electoral College voting on Dec. 15, and Inauguration Day on Jan. 20.

Immediately before Thanksgiving Day, another appeal was added to the US Supreme Court which directly challenges the “Certification of Live Birth” that appears on Obama's website. In the case, Cort Wrotnowski alleges Connecticut Secretary of the State Susan Bysiewicz should not have placed Obama’s name on the ballot without verifying the authenticity of Obama’s birth certificate. “It’s a fundamental point, which is this document has not been produced,” Wrotnowski said. “I’m not the first, not the last, just among a growing number of people across the country who’ve become distressed about the lack of disclosure.”


Given many the many rumors swirling about Barack Obama’s youth, his and his mother’s travels between Africa, Indonesia, Hawaii and Washington State, his father’s Kenyan citizenship, family eye-witness accounts that Barack was born in Kenya, and other inconsistencies, speculation on the known facts is rampant. Critics estimate Obama and his campaign has spent nearly $1 million dodging the issue of the details behind his “birth certificate.”

Critics should be asking the correct questions with their requests to see the "birth certificate." As this article has shown, the root document(s) may be something other than a true “Certificate of Live Birth.”

To have a FULL accounting, the "birth certificate" is NOT enough. The ENTIRE "birth record" on file with the Secretary of Health Vital Statistics Office, as well as any archived files with the former "Secretary of Hawaii" (as was the procedure under the Organic Act of 1900), should be examined to determine if a “Late Birth Certificate” with modifications, or a “Certificate of Hawaiian Birth” is present or has been archived away from the "vault copy." It's entirely possible there are older "versions" and different types of birth certifications stored in Archive, at different locations "below" the top, most current certificate being used today.

Even in the event of an adoption, which is a possibility, the entire records can still be unsealed with a court order so that officials who have the Constitutional requirement to verify a candidate's qualifications may review the document. This is not to conduct a "witch hunt" -- but should be done in the venue of "due diligence," to put this issue to rest.

To silence the questions of his birth records and citizenship, as well as lessen his legal jeopardy in regard to his eligibility to hold the office of President, perhaps Obama’s best course of action would seem that he reveals the details of his birth record. In doing so, he would be able to put to rest doubts that have hounded him for years. Leaving the questions unanswered may well taint the legitimacy of his Presidency for years to come.

Article 2, Sect 1, Clause 5 (Natural Born Citizen) Robert Reece helps you keep tabs on the U.S. Congress. Brought and paid for through the stimulus funds.

Michael King, son of Daddy King aka Martin Luther King, Jr. is not a legitimate reverend, he is not a bona fide PhD, and his name isn't really "Martin Luther King, Jr." What's left? Just a sexual degenerate, an America-hating Communist, and a criminal betrayer of even the interests of his own people. You say prove it. I will, click on the link below if you want to know the truth about another FRAUD mlk.

The Beast as Saint:
The Truth About "Martin Luther King, Jr