Over 100 FREE Online Calculators

Monday, May 10, 2010

Hawaii Gov. Linda Lingle Is Stonewalling

(Obama's citizenship was questioned by several lawsuits before his election. Leo Donofrio's lawsuit was also rejected by the US Supreme Court. "Naturals" point to this as proof obama is legitimate. The questions raised in these lawsuits have not been answered by obama. Obama succeeded in avoiding providing proof of his US citizenship before he was elected and after his illegitimate election. Leo Donofrio, Phil Berg and millions of other Americans ask the question: Obama, if you are a natural born citizen of the US, why are you hiding the facts about your birth?) Story Reports

Hawaii Gov. Linda Lingle is playing a very insidious and dangerous game of stonewalling on the most secretive vital record in the state's history.

Last Sunday, she told a New York talk-show host the state's role in Barack Obama's birth certificate drama has "been an odd situation."

"This issue kept coming up so much in the campaign, and again I think it's one of those issues that is simply a distraction from the more critical issues that are facing the country," she added. "So I had my health director, who is a physician by background, go personally view the birth certificate in the birth records of the Department of Health, and we issued a news release at that time saying that the president was, in fact, born at Kapi'olani Hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii. And that's just a fact and yet people continue to call up and e-mail and want to make it an issue, and I think it's again a horrible distraction for the country by those people who continue this."

Now I've already dealt with the Kapi'olani Hospital issue in a column on Saturday. No news release from any Hawaii state office has ever asserted that Obama's birthplace was Kapi'olani. If Gov. Lingle would like to put out such a press release in 2010, that would be a public service. But she is flat-out lying if she claims her state has ever released information about a birth hospital before her dubious statement on a talk show in New York last week.

But I want to point out another striking contradiction in Lingle's latest statement.

Though that 2008 news release never said what Lingle claims it said, the statement by state health director Chiyome Fukino did say something the governor must have forgotten about: "No state official, including Governor Linda Lingle, has ever instructed that this vital record be handled in a manner different from any other vital record in the possession of the State of Hawaii."

Didn't Linda Lingle just tell us she ordered the review of the birth certificate?

And didn't Chiyome Fukino say Lingle never instructed that the record be handled differently from any other?

Isn't an inspection by the state's top health director and a series of press releases about the contents of the document handling "different from any other vital record in the possession of the state of Hawaii"?

Does the governor of Hawaii routinely order the inspection of birth records?

Isn't that highly unusual?

I would say it is.

When is this charade going to end?

When is the double-talk going to cease?

Why are the American people given so many different stories about Obama's nativity?

Why is it all necessary?

Why is a birth certificate a state secret?

How could release of a birth certificate possibly compromise Obama's privacy?

(The clear answer is because obama is an obvious FRAUD who cannot or will not provide documentation to verify his true identity. The governor of Hawaii is also a rabid liar as the above quote proves. Obama must conceal his true identity because if revealed it would prove he is a FRAUD. Obama is either a US citizen who is NOT a natural born citizen or not a US citizen at all. The more I read and investigate obama's identity I believe obama is just an illegal alien. Obama has already admitted he is not a natural born citizen and is therefore a FRAUD for this reason. The other big question is his concealed identity hidden in Hawaii. Obama even has the governor of Hawaii covering up for him.) Story Reports

The public wants to see that document with their own eyes.

Why is the state of Hawaii releasing details in dribs and drabs over a period of years rather than asking Obama for permission to release the document?

Why is Obama fighting tooth and nail and spending millions of dollars keeping it secret?

The more people like Lingle make these absurd and contradictory statements, the more suspicion is aroused.

That's the trouble with state secrets.

That's why we have laws prescribing public disclosure on vital matters of public concern.

The public does have a right to know – especially on matters such as the constitutional eligibility of the president of the United States.

For heaven's sake, if we can't get that document, the term "freedom of information" no longer has meaning in this country.

I’ve witnessed some very desperate blogging propaganda trying to stop the bleeding as the nation finally wakes up to the fact that President Obama was a British citizen at the time of his birth. Leo Donofrio


TellerIP said...

How many times do the officials in Hawaii have to say the same thing, that Obama was born in Hawaii as his original birth certificate says.

Yes, the Governor of Hawaii, Linda Lingle, said that Obama was born at Kapiolani. Obama himself has said this, as has his sister, as has this witness who recalls being told of the birth in Hawaii in 1961 (

However, Linda Lingle did not say that Fukino had said Kapiolani in a public statement. All she said was "said," meaning of course that Fukino had told her, probably on the telephone.

The official birth certificate of Hawaii, the facts on which were repeatedly confirmed by the officials in Hawaii, is sufficient to prove birth in Hawaii. This is especially true since there is no evidence of birth in Kenya. His Kenyan grandmother did not say that he was born in Kenya. She said that he was born in Hawaii.

Story Reports said...

You are again avoiding the fact obama has admitted he is a FRAUD because he has admitted he is NOT a natural born citizen as he defined the term in Senate Res S 511. Obama continues to avoid providing his original long form "certificate of live birth". This is because it would indicate his true identity.

The birth certificate issue is a side show to the main attraction, the fact obama has admitted he is NOT a natural born citizen as he himself defined the term in S 511.

When you talk about Hawwian officials verifying obama's identity it is an attempt to change the subject and avoid the fact obama has admitted he is a FRAUD.

TellerIP said...

A Natural Born Citizen is any US citizen who is not a naturalized citizen. Since Obama was born in Hawaii, he is a Natural Born Citizen. Obama has certainly NOT admitted that he is not a Natural Born Citizen because he IS a Natural Born Citizen.

The citizenship of his father or of both parents do not affect Natural Born Citizen status. All citizens who were born in America are Natural Born Citizens.

“Natural born citizen. Persons who are born within the jurisdiction of a national government, i.e. in its territorial limits, or those born of citizens temporarily residing abroad.” — Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition

That is why such prominent conservative Senators who are also lawyers as Orren Hatch and Lindsay Graham say that a Natural Born Citizen is simply one who was born in the USA:

Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), said:

“Every child born in the United States is a natural-born United States citizen except for the children of diplomats.” (December 11, 2008 letter to constituent)

Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT), said:

“What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.” (Senate Judiciary Committee hearing hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)

Also there have been MANY federal lawsuits in which the US-born children of foreign citizens are described as Natural Born US Citizens by the courts. For example:

Mustata v. US Dept. of Justice, 179 F.3d 1017 (6th Cir. 1999) (children born in US to two Romanian citizens described as “natural born citizens” of the US):

Petitioners Marian and Lenuta Mustata are citizens of Romania. At the time of their petition, they resided in Michigan with their two minor children, who are natural born citizens of the United States.

Diaz-Salazar v. INS, 700 F.2d 1156 (7th Cir. 1983) (child born in US to Mexican citizen is “natural born citizen” of US):

Petitioner, Sebastian Diaz-Salazar, entered the United States illegally [from Mexico] in 1974 and has been living and working in Chicago since that time. *** The relevant facts which have been placed before the INS, BIA, and this court can be summarized as follows: The petitioner has a wife and two children under the age of three in Chicago; the children are natural-born citizens of the United States.

Your first point was to question whether Obama was born in Hawaii. He was born in Hawaii, as the official birth certificate of Hawaii shows, and the facts on it were confirmed twice by the officials and at least once by the governor of Hawaii, who added the name of the hospital.

Your second point, after giving up on the allegation that he was not born in Hawaii, was that his father affects his Natural Born Citizen status. But this also is not true. By the way, Obama co-sponsored Senate Res. S 511 because it does not in any way affect him. It was an attempt to add McCain's criterion of eligibility (birth outside the USA to two US parents) to Obama's criterion of eligibility, birth in the USA--which has been around since the time of the writing of the Constitution.

All US citizens who were born in the USA are Natural Born Citizens, regardless of the citizenship of their parents and regardless of dual nationality. That is why Obama was confirmed unanimously by the Congress and why he was sworn in by the Chief Justice of the United States.

Story Reports said...

Again you ignore obama's own confession in his senate resolution S 511. In his cosponsored resolution he defined what he considered a natural born citizen. Obama's S 511 resolution indicated he believed a natural born citizen was a citizen born to parents who at the time of the birth were US citizens.

It doesn't matter what Hatch or graham says about their definition of a natural born citizen, what matters is what obama himself declared in his cosponsored resolution S 511.

In S 511 obama in effect declared himself a FRAUD because obama's parents were not both US citizens at the time of his "birth".

Obama has defined the natural born citizen term. Obama has also admitted he is a FRAUD who is not a Constitutional president.

TellerIP said...

S 511 refers only to McCain and it has McCain's name in it. Its purpose was to add McCain's criteria for being president (born on a naval base to two US presidents) to the existing criterion, birth in the USA.

Adding McCain does not take away, and cannot take away, the existing criterion for Natural Born Citizen status, birth in the USA.

ALL US citizens who were born in the USA are Natural Born Citizens. Obama and all the Senators knew that. That is why Obama voted for the resolution. For the OBVIOUS reason that it had no effect on him. Obama is a Natural Born Citizen because he was born in the USA.

“Natural born citizen. Persons who are born within the jurisdiction of a national government, i.e. in its territorial limits, or those born of citizens temporarily residing abroad.” — Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition.

Obama falls under the first of the two criteria, born within the jurisdiction. The intent of the resolution was to make clear that McCain falls under the second of the two criteria.

TellerIP said...

That should read "to two US citizens" of course.