Friday, October 23, 2009

Soupy Sales with Pookie and White Fang

Soupy Sales with Pookie and White Fang





Soupy Sales And Moe Howard

There Is Nobody In The Balloon At The Whitehouse





White House Lie: Claims President Obama Didn’t Know Pay Czar Would be Cutting Pay!

There is no one in the balloon or in control of the white house. This is what Obama wants you to believe. The zars are in control. Obama is telling America he is just a figurehead! The White House Claims Obama had no idea! The "balloon boy" Is Not In The Balloon! Its all fake and spin to deceive America.

............................................................................................

White House Lie: Claims President Obama Didn’t Know Pay Czar Would be Cutting Pay! 10/22/9

Pay Czar Kenneth Feinberg, -- Chief of Staff to diseased/deceased Senator TED KENNEDY and Lawyer who got rich off the 9-11 victims payoffs, plans to slash pay at 7 huge firms that took government bailouts…by as much as 90%! Now, the White House Claims Obama had no idea! “One official told Fox News that Feinberg from the start had the independent authority to work with companies and make such a call. Obama was never required to sign off before final decisions were made.”

Obama hired this man to slash corporate exec salaries. There’s no way he can claim now that he did not know this was going to happen! Slashing executive pay at companies that took taxpayer funded bailouts seems to make us feel good, however we have to remember that we are in new uncharted territory here. Government dictating pay does not happen in a capitalist society. It does not happen in free market capitalism. It is not permitted in the United States Constitution! No where does it give the President the authority to have czars or to limit the pay businesses offer.

This kind of thing only happens with fascist dictators and socialist or marxist governments. This is what happens when the media fails to properly vett a Presidential candidate. This is what happens when Conservative American voices are not heard or believed.

The majority of voting Americans chose Barack Hussein Obama (mmmm, mmmm, mmmm) as the nation’s first socialist president. His plans, his actions, his unconstitutional abuses of power must be stopped.

..........................................................................................

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Government takeover of the internet

On Thursday Oct 21, 2009, the Federal Communications Commission will consider “a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on policies to preserve the open Internet.” That’s a long way of saying that the FCC, led by Julius Genachowski, Obama’s old friend from Harvard Law School, will take its first steps towards forcing through net neutrality, a controversial policy that critics say would amount to a government takeover of the internet.

Internet Service Providers—the ones who have actually invested in the architecture and infrastructure that enables us all to access the internet—have long been opposed to net neutrality, as have conservatives and libertarians concerned about maintaining free markets and promoting innovation and quality service.

But, with concerns that the FCC might now act to push net neutrality through, some voices less traditionally associated with opposition to the policy are speaking out regarding the proposed rulemaking, too. In fact, a number of Democrats and groups typically aligned with the left—the online component of which has long treated net neutrality as a top three policy objective—seem to be feeling less than warm and fuzzy about increased government intervention with regard to the internet.


Those groups include the Communications Workers of America labor union, which in a letter to Chairman Genachowski from Thursday, raised concerns regarding the impact that the FCC’s rulemaking could have on job creation at a time of 10 percent unemployment. Groups like the Asian American Justice Center, National Council of La Raza, the League of United Latin American Citizens and the National Urban League, keen to avoid a widening of the “digital divide,” also voiced concerns in a letter to the FCC dated October 13.

Democratic Governors, including Arkansas Gov. Mike Beebe and North Carolina Gov. Beverly Perdue, have urged caution with regard to the issue. Meanwhile, Oklahoma’s Democratic Gov. Brad Henry wrote to Genachowski earlier this month to tout the positive effects of his state’s model of “light or no regulation for landline, broadband and wireless services.”

Last Thursday, 72 Democratic members of the House of Representatives, also in a letter to Genachowski, wrote that “it is our strong belief that continued progress in expanding the reach and capabilities of broadband networks will require the Commission to reiterate, and not repudiate, its historic commitment to competition, private investment and a restrained regulatory approach.”

A restrained regulatory approach net neutrality would not be, of course. Opponents of the policy rightly argue that its implementation would stifle innovation and impact service—a little bit the way that a government takeover of health care would with regard to that industry. Also like health care, the internet is something that most Americans are unable and unwilling to go without. Turning the internet into the functional equivalent of the US Postal Service (a communications system in which Genachowski takes a deep, and arguably ironic, personal interest) is the wrong answer to preserving it in a viable, useful form.
........................................................................................


Obama minions will follow their leader in the quest to eliminate free speech. Obama is allready trying to quell fox news and talk radio. He is not trying to quell cnn, msnbc, cbs,nbc,abc etc. The truth is delivered on the internet via vaious conservative and independent blogs. Mu blog also delivers the truth I believe. Obama is a liar and an IMPOSTER. The truth.

Obama is not immune from prosecution for acts committed before taking office



......................................................................................


.........................................................................................
The landmark case of Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681 (1997) has set the precedent that a sitting President is not immune from prosecution for acts committed before taking office.

Obama’s refusal to release his long form 'Certificate of Live Birth' original long form from Hawaii, his manipulation of facts, his own statements can only lead a sensible person to believe that he intentionally has mislead the United States of America into a Constitutional Crisis by not verifying his online 'certification of live birth'. The 'certification of live birth' does not contain ANY information that can be verfied with out knowing what documents Hawaii has to back it up, if any.

However, this can now be resolved by the state court of the State of Arizona, if there is one sheriff, one prosecutor, one judge, one state representative loyal to the Constitution, because on December 13, 2007 at 3:01 PM Mountain Time, Barrack Hussein Obama, II fraudulently filed a notarized sworn affidavit in his own hand that declared himself to be a natural born citizen of the United States of America, and that he has fulfilled the requirements under the Constitution. The landmark case of Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681 (1997) has set the precedent that a sitting President is not immune from prosecution for acts committed before taking office.

.........................................................................................
A NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY OBAMA SWEARING AND CERTIFYING HE IS A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. HIS SIGNATURE IS ON THIS DOCUMENT TESTIFYING HE IS “A NATURAL BORN U.S. CITIZEN.”

This document is "the smoking gun" because it is HIS word that he is a NATURAL BORN US CITIZEN. He says “i do solemnly swear he is a natural u.s. born citizen”.
.........................................................................................

Elected Officials In Arizona Helpful List

Elected Officials In Arizona

Arizona Government Information Resource Locator

Presidential Preference Election Filing Information

Rock Solid Evidence Obama IS A FRAUD/IMPOSTER

Obama Committed Fraud Before Election
.........................................................................................

The question now is can America find one honest public servant in Arizona who believes in the supremacy of the US Constitution. Write, Call, Email and Fax these people to Inforce 520 U.S. 681 (1997) precedent that a sitting President is not immune from prosecution for acts committed before taking office.


# U.S. Senator Jon Kyl Junior Seat
# 1st District - U.S. House Representative - Kirkpatrick, Ann (R)
# 2nd District - U.S. House Representative - Franks, Trent (R)
# 3rd District - U.S. House Representative - Shadegg, John (R)
# 4th District - U.S. House Representative - Pastor, Ed (D)
# 5th District - U.S. House Representative - Mitchell, Harry (D)
# 6th District - U.S. House Representative - Flake, Jeff (R)
# 7th District - U.S. House Representative - Grijalva, Raul M. (D)
# 8th District - U.S. House Representative - Giffords, Gabrielle (D)
# Arizona Governor Jan Brewer
# Attorney General Terry Goddard
# Corporation Commissioner Kristin K. Mayes - Chairman
# Corporation Commissioner Gary Pierce
# Corporation Commissioner Paul Newman
# Corporation Commissioner Sandra D. Kennedy
# Corporation Commissioner Bob Stumpl
# Secretary of State Ken Bennett
# State Mine Inspector Joe Hart
# Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Horne
# Treasurer Dean Martin

........................................................................................

Arizona Public records Request Form

.........................................................................................

I want to know WHY I haven't heard of any lawyer talking about requesting or filing a lawsuit to force Arizona to explain how the state certified obama's sworn affidavit in his own hand that declared he is a natural born citizen of the United States of America.

******************************************************************************************
******************************************************************************************
Clinton v. Jones, U.S. Supreme Court Case Summary & Oral Argument
******************************************************************************************
******************************************************************************************

Clinton v. Jones, U.S. Supreme Court Case Summary & Oral Argument

******************************************************************************************

Facts of the Case:

Paula Corbin Jones sued President Bill Clinton. She alleged that while she was an Arkansas state employee, she suffered several "abhorrent" sexual advances from then Arkansas Governor Clinton. Jones claimed that her continued rejection of Clinton's advances ultimately resulted in punishment by her state supervisors. Following a District Court's grant of Clinton's request that all matters relating to the suit be suspended, pending a ruling on his prior request to have the suit dismissed on grounds of presidential immunity, Clinton sought to invoke his immunity to completely dismiss the Jones suit against him. While the District Judge denied Clinton's immunity request, the judge ordered the stay of any trial in the matter until after Clinton's Presidency. On appeal, the Eighth Circuit affirmed the dismissal denial but reversed the trial deferment ruling since it would be a "functional equivalent" to an unlawful grant of temporary presidential immunity.

Question:

Is a serving President, for separation of powers reasons, entitled to absolute immunity from civil litigation arising out of events which transpired prior to his taking office?

Conclusion:

NO!!!! In a unanimous opinion, the Court held that the Constitution does not grant a sitting President immunity from civil litigation except under highly unusual circumstances. After noting the great respect and dignity owed to the Executive office, the Court held that neither separation of powers nor the need for confidentiality of high-level information can justify an unqualified Presidential immunity from judicial process. While the independence of our government's branches must be protected under the doctrine of separation of powers, the Constitution does not prohibit these branches from exercising any control over one another. This, the Court added, is true despite the procedural burdens which Article III jurisdiction may impose on the time, attention, and resources of the Chief Executive.

Decision: 9 votes for Jones, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Article 1, Section 7, Paragraph 2: Separation of Powers


..........................................................................................
Clinton v. Jones - Oral Argument Read This Or Listen
..........................................................................................

Clinton v. Jones - Oral Argument

..........................................................................................

Clinton v. Jones - Opinion Announcement Read This Or Listen

..........................................................................................

Clinton v. Jones - Opinion Announcement

..........................................................................................
Supreme Court Ruling Quote: The opinion of the Court in No. 95-1853, Clinton against Jones will be announced by Justice Stevens.

We therefore hold that the doctrine of separation of powers does not require Federal Courts to stay all private actions against the president
until he leaves office.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What this means is a civil law suit can be brought against obama for fraud because he claims to be a "natural born citizen".

If Obama claims to be a "natural born citizen" he must prove he is and state how he has come to this decision. On what does he base his fact? No federal law in existance at his birth will make him a natural born citizen. Obama has stated on his web site he was a dual citizen at birth because of his father. He father was a Kenyan citizen at obama's birth so he states he was too until age 21. Obama says he was an American citizen and a Kenyan citizen at birth. A dual citizen at birth. A dual citizen at birth is NOT A NATUAL BORN CITIZEN! (TO be a natural born citizen at birth both of his parents must be US citizens at birth) Obama is a FRAUD and IMPOSTER.


Instead of concentrating Exclusively on the "birth certificate" issue, the Supreme Court Ruling should be used to expose obama as an IMPOSTER in Arizona and if possible in any federal or state court.

_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________

TAKE ACTION: ASK THE QUESTION I HAVE BELOW!

_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
PHOENIX – Oct. 19, 2009 – Arizona Attorney magazine will co-sponsor an Oct. 26 program, the Principles of Constitutional and Statutory Interpretation, with the William H. Rehnquist Center at the University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law. U.S. Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia and Stephen Breyer will participate in the program.

Oct. 19, 2009 – Arizona Attorney magazine will co-sponsor an Oct. 26 program, the Principles of Constitutional and Statutory Interpretation, with the William H. Rehnquist Center at the University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law
.........................................................................................

JUSTICE BREYER, concurring in the judgment.

........................................................................................
OCTOBER TERM, 1996

Syllabus

CLINTON v. JONES

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-1853. Argued January 13, 1997-Decided May 27,1997

JUSTICE BREYER, concurring in the judgment.

I agree with the majority that the Constitution does not automatically grant the President an immunity from civil lawsuits based upon his private conduct. Nor does the "doctrine of separation of powers ... require federal courts to stay" virtually "all private actions against the President until he leaves office." Ante, at 705-706. Rather, as the Court of Appeals stated, the President cannot simply rest upon the claim that a private civil lawsuit for damages will "interfere with the constitutionally assigned duties of the Executive Branch ... without detailing any specific responsibilities or explaining how or the degree to which they are affected by the suit." 72 F.3d 1354, 1361 (CA8 1996). To obtain a postponement the President must "bea[r] the burden of establishing its need." Ante, at 708.

In my view, however, once the President sets forth and explains a conflict between judicial proceeding and public duties, the matter changes. At that point, the Constitution permits a judge to schedule a trial in an ordinary civil damages action (where postponement normally is possible without overwhelming damage to a plaintiff) only within the constraints of a constitutional principle-a principle that forbids a federal judge in such a case to interfere with the President's discharge of his public duties. I have no doubt that the Constitution contains such a principle applicable to civil suits, based upon Article II's vesting of the entire "executive Power" in a single individual, implemented through the Constitution's structural separation of powers, and revealed both by history and case precedent.

The landmark case of Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681 (1997) has set the precedent that a sitting President is not immune from prosecution for acts committed before taking office.
.........................................................................................
ASK OBAMA THIS QUESTION THROUGH THE COURTS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(This Question Needs to be Asked During Or After The Principles of Constitutional and Statutory Interpretation Program?)

My specific question asks if Supreme Court Ruling No. 95-1853, case of Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681 (1997) , would apply to any State or Federal Court Case that would involve the question of "natural born citizenship" that Obama has indicated on State Of Arizona Presidential Preference Election Candidate Nomination Paper (A.R.S. 16-242) but has not been validated by law. In other words can I or any other US citizen file a civil suit claiming obama committed fraud before the election and expect obama to answer the suit.
.........................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On December 13, 2007 at 3:01 PM Mountain Time, Barrack Hussein Obama, II fraudulently filed a sworn affidavit in his own hand that declared himself to be a natural born citizen of the United States of America, and that he has fulfilled the requirements under the Constitution. The landmark case of Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681 (1997) has set the precedent that a sitting President is not immune from prosecution for acts committed before taking office.

Ref: State Of Arizona Presidential Preference Election Candidate Nomination Paper (A.R.S. 16-242)

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

READY TO REVOLT: Oath Keepers pledges to prevent dictatorship in United States

READY TO REVOLT: Oath Keepers pledges to prevent dictatorship in United States

Group asks police and military to lay down arms in response to orders deemed unlawful

Launched in March by Stewart Rhodes, Oath Keepers bills itself as a nonpartisan group of current and retired law enforcement and military personnel who vow to fulfill their oaths to the Constitution.

More specifically, the group's members, which number in the thousands, pledge to disobey orders they deem unlawful, including directives to disarm the American people and to blockade American cities. By refusing the latter order, the Oath Keepers hope to prevent cities from becoming "giant concentration camps," a scenario the 44-year-old Rhodes says he can envision happening in the coming years.

It's a Cold War-era nightmare vision with a major twist: The occupying forces in this imagined future are American, not Soviet.

"The whole point of Oath Keepers is to stop a dictatorship from ever happening here," Rhodes, a former Army paratrooper and Yale-trained lawyer, said in an interview with the Review-Journal. "My focus is on the guys with the guns, because they can't do it without them.

"We say if the American people decide it's time for a revolution, we'll fight with you."

The Patriot movement, so named because its adherents believe the federal government has stepped on the constitutional ideals of the American Revolution.

Oath Keepers is not preaching violence or government overthrow, Rhodes said. On the contrary, it is asking police and the military to lay down their arms in response to unlawful orders.

The group's Web site, www.oathkeepers.org, features videos and testimonials in which supporters compare President Barack Obama's America to Adolf Hitler's Germany. They also liken Obama to England's King George III during the American Revolution.

One member, in a videotaped speech at an event in Washington, D.C., calls Obama "the domestic enemy the Constitution is talking about."
(Yes I agree the "domestic enemy is obama because he is a traitor destroying our Sovereignty through government corrupiton. Story Reports)

The motto of Oath Keepers: "Not on our watch!"

The message Rhodes hears from the government: We're watching you.

What Rhodes terms "the rise of executive privilege" during the post-9/11 years of the Bush presidency will in his opinion only accelerate with Obama in office. What's worse, he said, is that "gun-hating extremists" now control the White House.

"We're not a militia," he said. "And we're not part and parcel of the white supremacist movement. I loathe white supremacists."

Oath Keepers doesn't offer paramilitary training; nor does it have a military command structure. It instead has board members, which include directors in seven states and outreach coordinators to currently serving local and federal law enforcement and military personnel. The group's state director in Montana, who goes by the name Elias Alias, has said Montana and other states should consider seceding from the United States in protest of the federal government's conduct.


On the anniversary of the Battle of Lexington Green, the Massachusetts battle that started the American Revolution in 1775, a group of Oath Keepers went to the battle site and reaffirmed their pledge to the Constitution.

"There are thousands of Americans who go to Lexington to watch re-enactments of people shooting at troops," Rhodes said. "But if you're a group of military and police there, they somehow find this offensive."

Rhodes said he hopes Oath Keepers members think about the lawfulness of day-to-day orders they receive.

For example, if a police officer feels he is being asked to do an illegal search of a home or vehicle, he should stand down.

Rhodes eventually wants to create a legal defense fund for Oath Keepers who are disciplined by their employers for defying orders they deem unlawful or immoral.

"The message to law enforcement is not to become a tool of oppression," he said.

Rhodes, a husband and father of five home-schooled children, said he gets hundreds of e-mails a day, mostly from people interested in knowing more about his group.

He also gets a lot of questions from "birthers" wanting to know if he thinks Obama is really an American citizen and from "truthers" asking whether he believes the attacks of 9/11 were an inside job. The group doesn't have an official position on either issue, he said.

Some of his responses to questions have turned would-be allies against him.

"I've been accused of being a traitor or a CIA operative because I'm not coming out and declaring that the H1N1 (swine flu) vaccine is a biological weapon," he said.

Monday, October 19, 2009

Missing Page From Obama Parent’s 1964 Divorce: Pg 11 Birth Certificate Possibly From Kenya

Um Um Um we might have another smoking gun. Missing Page From Obama Parent’s 1964 Divorce: Pg 11 Birth Certificate (missing record)

.........................................................................................
An astute blogger Nicole's observations below.
.........................................................................................
In assisting with the retrieval of the initial 8 pages a couple of weeks before Obama’s Inauguration, I and a few other researchers subsequently discovered from the clerk in Hawaii that there were 6 MORE pages, or 14 total pages total. The clerk read the index information directly from the microfiche machine over the phone when the request was placed. “14 pages total,” she said, very clearly, repeating the answer several more times on the page count.

I mailed off a check for the other 6 pages to be sent. Imagine my surprise a few days later when I opened the envelope and only saw 5 pages – page 11 was missing – bringing the total page count to 13.

See the whole Obama 1964 divorce on Scribd.com or as 13 individual images below (in proper order):

Page 11 was missing from obama and dunham 1964 divorce decree. View it here.

I immediately called the clerk in Hawaii and asked where the extra page was. She looked, and counted, and said that there must be some mistake in the records – she counted only 13 pages that are available for reprint. I pointed out to her that the page count she sent skipped from page 10 to page 12 – page 11 was missing. To that, she suggested that perhaps the pages were simply misnumbered before they where archived into the microfiche.

I accepted her answer, not thinking much about it at the time. Perhaps it was just a clerical error in the 1960s, when hand-filed paper records and IBM punch cards were how court documents were tracked and maintained.

I have since come to learn that Obama and his team of lawyers have been working to sanitize his records since he announced that he’d run for President circa November 2004. Now in the White House, he’s still ACTIVELY blocking subpoenas for such documents as his Cambridge and Occidental College records TODAY – the same type of documents promised to be made available during his campaign. Obama and his lawyers are exceedingly adept at exploiting loopholes in Hawaiian birth certificate law to keep Obama’s past hidden from the American people.

This missing page – page 11 – very likely is a copy of the original birth certificate, based upon the prima facie timeline of the 1964 divorce. The Kenya birth certificate was likely requested on Jan 23, 1964 by either Judge King (to award custody on the next trial date), or recommended to Ann Dunham by her attorney for the ex parte divorce, where only one parent was expected to be present. (Or a copy of his original Hawaii birth certificate or a copy from some other location, Canada? Story Reports)

The missing page, 11, should be chronologically-numbered as all other pages were in the original docket file, by the court clerk at the time. Starting at page 8, Exhibit A is placed where it would have occurred by date in the paperwork (and appeared on microfiche), even denoting an erased, yet barely-readable “8″ on both pages of the returned notification sent to Obama SR. The missing page, numbered as page 11, would likely be a page that would have been admitted to the divorce file sometime in mid- to late-February 1964 – almost as if it were an undocumented “Exhibit B”.

Here’s a very plausible timeline merging the 1964 Obama Divorce papers and new Kenya birth certificate:

Jan 20 (Mon) – divorce request is filed by Stanley Ann D. Obama

Jan 23 (Thur) – divorce orders for trial are given by Judge King at chambers (note – if the judge, or Ann Dunham’s attorney, told her to order the Kenya birth certificate, it would have been mailed 10,000 miles away, to the “Coast Province” Registrar’s office of the “Republic of Kenya”, likely arriving around the first week of February 1964 to be processed)

Jan 28 (Tue) – Gail A. Watanabe, presumably an assistant of Ann Obama attorney George Kerr, mails the notification for trial to Obama SR (her affidavit is signed Feb 3 and filed)

Jan 30 (Thur) – via Air Mail, notification of trial arrives at Obama SR’s Cambridge, Mass, address. The 10-day “knock and nail” notification would have expired on Sun, Feb 9. Therefore, the next trial date would have been automatically set, per Judge King’s instructions, for the first Tuesday, 30 days later, onMarch 3

Feb 10 (Mon) – allowing for a 10-day “knock and nail” notification for trial, Obama SR’s trial notification would have been retrieved by the US Post Office on this date, to be mailed back (as events turned out – UNSIGNED by Obama SR) to Hawaii as an exhibit for trial

*Feb 17 (Mon) – the Obama Kenya birth certificate is signed by the “Coast Province” Deputy Registrar, to be mailed back to Hawaii for receipt by Ann Obama and/or her attorney (note: mail time would have ranged from a few days (Air Mail) to a couple of weeks (ship), arriving back in Hawaii in the last week of February to first week of March 3 (Tue). Based upon Judge King’s Jan 23 orders for the next trial date, “at 9:30 a.m. on the first Tuesday after thirty (30) days have elapsed from and after the date” that Obama SR would have been served with the notice of trial. That notification came back, unsigned, by Obama SR, so Ann’s attorneys surely requested, and received Default Judgment for the divorce in her favor for “grievous mental suffering”

Mar 5 (Thur) – trial takes place in favor of divorce in Hawaii, placing custody of Obama JR to his mother by default (note: the trial was likely rescheduled 2 days after the automatically set date of Mar 3, possibly for the convenience of the judge and/or parties)

Mar 20 (Fri) – the divorce decree is signed by Judge King

In Hawaii, birth certificates are not Public Record. If the Kenya birth certificate was a part of the divorce decree, it may have been pulled out at the end of the trial, or more recently by a watchful archivist or attorneys wishing to remove unfavorable information about Obama. (We need to know if obama's "birth certificate" was ever part of the divorce decree record. Lets ask the doh in hawaii about this. Was this information indexed and available through the doh to the public? UmUmUm where were you born obama? Story Reports)

To date, despite other honest attempts to refute the Kenya birth certificate, such as dealing with when the “Republic of Kenya” came into existence as a republichave been “un-bunked.” Dishonest alterations of the Kenya birth certificate have been maliciously created by sites such as Democratic Underground, designed to discredit the Kenya birth certificate – they’ve been un-bunked as well.

Having not actually seeing the Kenya birth certificate, and it’s chain of evidence, no intellectually-honest person can say if it’s real or not. By the same token, none of us have seen or touched the short-form “Certification of Live Birth” that has appeared on Obama’s “Fight the Smears” or FactCheck.org websites. (Exactly, no chain of evidence for the "certification of live birth from Hawaii either. She is correct "no intellectually honest person can say" if obama's short for is real) We know it has not been verfiied legally. (Story Reports)

Hawaiian law would have allowed for Obama to have been born in a foreign country. The “Certification of Live Birth” can’t confirm if Obama has EVER been eligible to hold the office of Commander in Chief, based upon loopholes in pre-statehood, transitional and current Hawaiian statutes. Inconsistencies, such as conflicting hospitals in Hawaii that Obama, his friends and family have publicly-stated he may have been born only add to the confusion. Obama’s abstract “Certification of Live Birth” doesn’t tell us if there were ANY “certifying officials” present who independent verified the “facts” of his birth – it’s anyone’s guess.

Obama himself cannot guaranty that he was born on American soil – really, who can remember their own childbirth?! Furthermore, his mother’s whereabouts are unconfirmed, inconsistent, and unknown, from the time of Obama’s conception, until a few weeks or months after his birth.

Thus is the purpose of Medical Doctors, Nurses, Midwives and Registrars, acting as “Certifying Officials” of a birth, to ensure the integrity – or chain of evidence – of the birth certificate to be properly recorded within Vital Statistics archives. Judges presiding over divorces ALSO produce a verifiable paper trail, as we can see on the 1964 Obama divorce.

At this time, both Birth Certificates from Kenya and Hawaii lack a publicly-exhibited, independently-verifiable chain of evidence – and chain of custody. As such, the Obama Kenyan birth certificate is as strong and believable a document as the Hawaiian “Certification of Live Birth”. However, Obama’s Kenyan birth certificate possesses something the Certificate does not – plausibility, based upon independent prima facie facts – the 1964 Obama divorce decree. Dynomite!

This may be the smoking gun. Instead of a dead-end in Hawaii, go to the source, Kenya. If this document is proved to be legit, we have a constitutional crisis. We’ve broken our Constitution and may have changed our form of democracy forever. Obama and the Democrat monopoly are railroading socialist laws at an unprecedented pace. There is no major media over-site, because 90 percent of journalists are Democrat/socialists who want a large central government that will heavily tax businesses.

Obama 1964 Divorce papers missing page 11, possibly a Kenyan Birth Certificate?

*****************************************************************************************
*****************************************************************************************

OBAMA'S INELIGIBILITY: HOW DEEP DOES THE CORRUPTION GO?


September 23, 2009
excerpts:
"While correspondence sent to TerriK confirms that President Obama’s vital records have been amended, the DoH has refused to make the documents requested available. One count of the litigation will attempt to have those documents released. The other counts concern various information denied to her which – according to Hawaii law – she is entitled to.

Hawaii has been caught blatantly circumventing their own laws; laws specifically created to foster open government practices.

The fact that Obama/Soetoro's passport records were breached and most likely sanitized, should have made the dominant media come unglued. They have remained silent. It is believed the usurper traveled to Pakistan under the name Barry Soetoro as an Indonesian citizen.

While some may scoff that this is nothing but a conspiracy theory, this young man is dead and I believe it is tied to protecting the usurper. I am not accusing Obama/Soetoro, but others who might have acted on their own to protect him.

Key witness in passport fraud case fatally shot

"A key witness in a federal probe into passport information stolen from the State Department was fatally shot in front of a District church, the Metropolitan Police Department said yesterday.

Last month a "key witness" in chicago that was going to testify against Blagovich died suddenly of an "asprin overdose" 3 days after he said he would testify. (Both of these witnesses could have had information that would reveal obama is a fraud and imposter. Both "witnesses" were taken down.)

Government should exist to protect the freedoms of the individuals whom it serves





The President Of The United States Nor Any Govenment Agency CAN TELL A COUNTY SHERIFF WHAT TO DO!

Richard Mack, former sheriff of Graham County, Arizona believes government should exist to protect the freedoms of the individuals whom it serves.

Sheriff Mack

Richard Mack, former sheriff of Graham County, Arizona:

Right now, it is vital that we restore the Constitution as the supreme law of the land. The greatest threat we face today is not terrorists; it is our own federal government. If America is conquered or ruined it will be from within, not a foreign enemy.

In 1994 Richard Mack filed a lawsuit challenging the Brady bill to stop the federal government from forcing another unfunded mandate down our throats. Richard Mack won a decision at the US Supreme Court on the issue of States' rights. This suit catapulted him to national attention, with television appearances on the Donahue Show, Good Morning America, Crossfire, Nightline, CNBC, and SHOWTIME'S the AMERICAN CANDIDATE. Richard Mack has been on over 500 radio talk shows nationwide, ranging from G. Gordon Liddy and Charles Goyette to Derry Brownfield and Pat Buchannan. Richard Mack has traveled the country extensively and has seen first hand the horrible side effects from politicians who have replaced our Constitution with their own political agendas and party platforms.

Sheriff Richard Mack lectures and give seminars on constitutional issues relating to gun control, law enforcement, States' rights, the farce, otherwise known as the drug war, and the oath of office. Richard Mack has also been a consultant for lawyers, and people in general helping them with cases of unlawful arrests and police misconduct. Shwriff Richard Mack has stood for "the little guy" against "big brother" government.

The founders of our nation were afraid of one thing more than any other... government having too much power! Remember, they escaped from the tyranny of an oppressive and controlling government when they established this nation. They fought and died for it, and now we are letting these same freedoms they fought for slip away little by little, without a second thought.

In order to succeed, we must first make ourselves aware of the problem. We must educate ourselves, and then we can know what action to take. One of the best and easiest solutions is to depend on local officials, especially the sheriff, to stand against federal intervention and federal criminality.

* What rights does the constitution actually guarantee?
* Why is it important that we not allow our means of self-defense to be taken from us?
* What are the dangers of giving government too much power?
* What can we do to remain strong as individuals and families, so that we can remain strong as a nation?
* How do we win the war on illegal drugs?
* What can the sheriff do to protect us from all enemies, both foreign and domestic?

Please take a few moments to read and think about these things. It really may be a life or death situation!. Richard Mack, former sheriff of Graham County, Arizona.

Sheriff Mack

.........................................................................................

Sheriff Mack established the ‘line in the sand’ for his constituents back in 1994 as the Brady Bill mandate for county law enforcement officials amounted to the following according to Mack, “This law literally forced each sheriff to become a pawn for the Federal Government and to do their bidding to promote gun control within our jurisdictions. Even more astounding was the fact that no funds were allocated for us to do this work and the Brady Act contained a provision to arrest us if we failed to comply. Wow! So here’s the U.S. Congress making an unconstitutional gun control law, requiring a county official to enforce it and pay for it, and then threatening to arrest him if he refuses! What a government!”

In retrospect for Sheriff Mack, the victory declared in the majority opinion by U.S. Supreme Count Justice Scalia back on June 27, 1997 has meaning in 2009 as it confirms (it did not confer for the 10th Amendment does such) the local sheriff’s inherent constitutional right to be the last deterrent to an errant Federal government, to be free from Federal compulsion and thus be as Mack declares, “Sheriffs have the authority, the power, and the duty to be the ultimate check and balance for the American citizenry in your county and to defend them against all local and federal criminals.”

What rights does the Constitution actually guarantee? Why is it important that we not allow our means of self-defense to be taken from us? What are the dangers of giving government too much power? What can we do to remain strong as individuals and families, so that we can remain strong as a nation? How do we win the war on illegal drugs? What can the sheriff do to protect us from all enemies, both foreign and domestic? Providing answers to those questions will continue to keep Sheriff Mack occupied and has brought a natural alliance with Oath Keepers.

Sunday, October 18, 2009

Um Um Um Barack Hussein DAVIS?

.........................................................................................
Obama mentor and "father" instilled racism in the young turk obama.
.........................................................................................





MissTICKLY may have found evidence tending to indicate that (please take a deep breath) Barack Obama is the son of cousins, Stanley Ann Dunham and Frank Marshall Davis, obama's "mentor". If true, this would imply criminal fraud by Obama.

Listen In monday 10/19 at 9:00pm est to find out about the davis "connection'
...........................................................................................

Lord Monckton's Blogger + MissTickly's New Bombshell - Oct 20,2009
Monday, October 19, 2009 9:00 PM
THE 2 MOST IMPORTANT STORIES OF THE YEAR ?!
WALTER HUDSON is the blogger who witnessed, recorded and broke the news of Lord Monckton's siren call for our paramount American Sovereignties. We'll listen to both of these gentlemen in hour-1.

Then, MissTICKLY may have found evidence tending to indicate that (please take a deep breath) Barack Obama is the son of cousins, Stanley Ann Dunham and Frank Marshall Davis -- and is heir to the Hawaiian throne. If true, this would imply criminal fraud by Obama.
Don't miss these two hours. You may wish to prepare first, by reading Hudson's posting in Sentinel Radio Blog and Mr. Hudson's own Fightin' Words.

MissTickly, a.k.a. TerriK continues to break the news of her Hawaiian documents investigation in her blog as she did in last week's "The Awakening" broadcast. The prior week, Leo Donofrio told us about his own, related, Hawaiian investigation.

.............................................................................................

WAS COMMUNIST FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS MERELY OBAMA'S MENTOR?

QUESTION:

* WHO LOOKS MORE LIKE FATHER AND SON, FRANK & BARRY OR BARRY AND OBAMA SENIOR?

* LOOK AT THE SUPRA-ORBITAL RIDGES, THE FOREHEAD, THE HAIRLINE, THE EYEBROWS, THE EYELIDS, THE JOWLS, THE CHEEKBONES - AND THE EARS.

* FACT: IMO, BARRY OBAMA JUNIOR LOOKS NOTHING LIKE BARACK OBAMA SENIOR, AND VERY MUCH LIKE FRANK DAVIS.

* AND BARRY HAS MANY OF FRANK'S TRAITS: LIKE A GIFT FOR WRITING, FOR INSTANCE.

* AND IT GIVES OBAMA JUNIOR A VERY DEEP CONNECTION TO CHICAGO - FRANK'S HOMETOWN. A REAL REASON TO MOVE THERE.

* REMEMBER: STANLEY ANN DUNHAM WAS PREGNANT WHEN SHE MARRIED OBAMA SENIOR. MAYBE IT WASN'T HIS CHILD.

* FRANK DAVIS WROTE IN HIS MEMOIR THAT HE AND HIS WIFE HAD A THREESOME WITH A WHITE GIRL NAMED ANN - AGED 14.
* WAS THIS STANLEY ANNE DUNHAM - AGED 17?

* IF THIS IS SO, THEN MAYBE SHE MARRIED OBAMA SENIOR BECAUSE SHE KNEW THE CHILD WOULD BE BLACK AND SHE NEEDED A BLACK HUSBAND.
* DID THEY MAKE A DEAL: SHE GOT A FATHER FOR HER BABY AND HE GOT STAY IN THE USA?

THIS CAN BE EASILY PROVEN: JUST GET A DNA TEST FROM A RELATIVE IN KENYA AND SEE IF IT MATCHES BARRY OBAMA JUNIOR'S.

JUST ASKING. 'CAUSE ON THE FACE OF IT, IT SURE LOOKS LIKE BARRY IS RELATED TO DAVIS NOT OBAMA SENIOR.

........................................................................................

*"....for Paradise has some of the most lushly beautiful women on earth. Many local studs are frantic to bed a soul sister who is not a pro; propaganda painting their passion and horizontal ability has fallen on receptive ears. Afro-American brothers make out with all kinds of dolls. One pure black African student from Ghana wreaked havoc among co-eds at the university, and the wife of a prominent white local politician considered shucking her husband for him; another student from Kenya split leaving two pregnant blondes" Frank Marshall Davis, "Livin' the Blues, p.318

video that contains frank marshall davis the illegitimate "father" of the illegitimate obama.

.......................................................................................

“Mendacious adults ‘switched’ Obama at birth. That is why he has refused to allow access to the original or ‘vault’ birth certificate,” Andy Martin told a Honolulu news conference. “We believe the original certificate did not list a father. Barack Obama became the father as a result of an agreement between Ann Dunham, Frank Marshall Davis and Barack Obama, Sr.

“Davis was already married to a White Woman. He did not need a nonmarital child by a second one. Ann probably refused to have what was then called a ‘back alley’ abortion. Davis may have felt that ‘Obama’ would face less stigma with an ‘African’ background than a Negro one. The civil rights revolution, of course, turned that gambit upside down. In discovering and understanding what happened we cannot forget we are dealing with events in 1961, not 2008.

“The irony in all of this is that Obama once stated he did not want his daughters to be ‘victimized’ with a child. And he is alive because his mother took the contrary view.

“Barack Obama has known this since adulthood, and the shock of this discovery still reverberates in his psyche.

.........................................................................................

QUESTIONS & POSSIBLE ANSWERS...

Why doesn't Obama Junior look anything like Obama Senior?

* OBAMA JUNIOR LOOKS MORE LIKE FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS THAN ANYONE IN THE DUNHAM FAMILY OR THE OBAMA CLAN.

How did the Hawaiian/Indonesian Obama JUNIOR - whose family had connections to Kansas and Kenya - REALLY end up in Chicago, of all places?

* FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS WAS FROM CHICAGO AND HAD DEEP AND IMPORTANT CONNECTIONS TO THE LEFT IN CHICAGO. MAYBE THESE CONNECTIONS WERE THE REAL CONNECTIONS OBAMA USED IN CHICAGO.

Why did Obama's mother REALLY FEEL it was okay to leave him in Hawaii?

* PERHAPS STANLEY ANNE DUNHAM OBAMA SOETORO FELT IT WAS OKAY TO LEAVE BARACK JUNIOR IN HAWAII BECAUSE SHE KNEW BARACK JUNIOR REAL FATHER WOULD BE THERE TO LOOK OUT FOR HIM.

Why did Stanley Dunham - the grandfather - take Barack junior to visit with Frank Davis Marshall's all the time?

* PERHAPS BECAUSE HE ALSO KNEW THAT FRANK WAS BARACK'S REAL FATHER.

From whom did Barack Junior really INHERIT his literary skills?

PERHAPS FROM HIS REAL FATHER - THE AUTHOR AND POET FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS.

FACT:

Frank Marshall Davis wrote in his fictionalized memoir that he and his wife had a threesome with a young white girl named Ann, aged 14.

COULD THIS HAVE REALLY BEEN STANLEY ANNE DUNHAM, AGED 17?

WAS HER MARRIAGE TO BARACK SENIOR MERELY AN ACT OF CONVENIENCE FOR THEM BOTH?

FACT:

You don't get into the inner echelons of Chicago politics without being sent by someone connected. They always ask, "WHO SENT YOU?"

WHO SENT OBAMA? Was it Ayers - who he might have met in Colombia, or was it through his real biological father, Frank Marshall Davis?

The stories we have been told by the Obama camp don't add up.

BOTTOM-LINE:

THE ONLY STORY WHICH CONNECT ALL THE DOTS IS THE STORY IN WHICH THE CHICAGO COMMUNIST AND POET DAVIS IS BARACK'S REAL FATHER.

IT MAY SEEM WILD, BUT IT ACTUALLY PASSES OCCAM'S RAZOR.

*******UPDATE:

EXIT QUESTION:

IS THIS THE REAL REASON OBAMA WON'T RELEASE HIS ACTUAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE OR HIS MEDICAL RECORDS?