Friday, September 25, 2009

A continuing pattern of misdirection by Dr. Janice Okubo

A continuing pattern of misdirection by Dr. Janice Okubo Hawaii Department of Health (DoH) Communications Director.
..........................................................................................
Leo Donofrio says there appears to be an ideological struggle – between the DoH and the OIP – playing out behind the scenes in Hawaii. Haw. Rev. Stat. 338-18(d) is a law which demands information be released.

..........................................................................................

Hawaii DoH Official Janice Okubo Places Her Thumb Directly In The Giant’s Eye. Leo Donofrio Blog

Leo Donofrio writes about the internal struggle going on in Hawaii to release information about obama
..........................................................................................

Leo Explains how hawaiian officals are hiding information about the fraud obama

Posted in Uncategorized on September 25, 2009 by naturalborncitizen

A report published today by the Post and Email’s John Charlton, chronicled that a citizen, having read and understood Part 1 of the Terrik investigation, requested that Hawaii Department of Health (DoH) Communications Director, Janice Okubo, forward to him “index data” pertaining to vital records of Barack Obama, citing Haw. Rev. Stat. 338-18(d). Okubo’s illegal and evasive response shows a continuing offensive pattern of misdirection:

Subject: RE: Dear Dr. Janice Okubo
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:09:29 -1000
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Dear Dr. Janice Okubo
Thread-Index: Aco9LwEBdvqZvY6wQAmINB4Ua3X91gAGRdkg
From: “Okubo, Janice S.”
To: XXXX
X-Antivirus: AVG for E-mail 8.5.409
Aloha Mr. XXXX,
State law prohibits the Department of Health from disclosing any information about a Hawaii vital record unless the requestor has a direct and tangible interest in the record. This includes verification of vital records and all the information contained in a record. Direct and tangible interest is determined by HRS §338-18(b) which can be found at: http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol06_Ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0018.htm…

This concludes our responses to your questions, no further response will be provided.

Janice Okubo
Communications Office
Hawaii State Department of Health
1250 Punchbowl Street
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
Phone: (808) 586-4442
Fax: (808) 586-4444
email: janice.okubo@doh.hawaii.gov

Okubo cites 338-18(b) while completely ignoring 338-18(d), which states:

(d) Index data consisting of name and sex of the registrant, type of vital event, and such other data as the director may authorize shall be made available to the public.

Index data is information. And as I pointed out in yesterday’s report, various OIP Opinion Letters state that this information must be made available to the public, no exceptions apply.

Yet, Okubo’s response tells the citizen that “State law prohibits the Department of Health from disclosing any information about a Hawaii vital record…”

That’s a direct lie.

Okubo’s continuing pattern of misdirecting citizens from appropriate statute sections is reprehensible.

It states in the UIPA Manual at page 10:

The UIPA requires agencies to disclose all “government records.” This term is defined broadly to include any information maintained by an agency that is recorded in any physical form.

So, when Okubo is asked for “index data” pertaining to vital records under 338-18(d), and she responds that state law prohibits the release of “any information” pertaining to vital records, please understand that she is lying in direct opposition to the UIPA as well as Haw. Rev. Stat. 338-18(d).

Do not despair. Okubo is employed by the DoH, but the Office of Information Practices (OIP) is a separate office which exists to police and advise the actions of other state of Hawaii agencies in their compliance with the UIPA.

Part 2 of the TerriK Investigation will document official responses to TerriK by OIP staff attorneys which appear to indicate that an ideological struggle – between the DoH and the OIP – may be in play behind the scenes in Hawaii. (I will publish on this issue no later than tomorrow, September 26, 2009.)

I believe the OIP understands that the UIPA laws are being purposely frustrated by the DoH. And the continuing misdirection by the DoH reflects poorly on the OIP who is being made to look like a rubber stamp for the DoH.

While the OIP has certainly been more helpful to TerriK than the DoH, the OIP has also granted the DoH far too much deference. One can only imagine the immense pressure involved. Regardless, the OIP is supposed to advise agencies on their public duty to release information when the law demands such information be released.

Haw. Rev. Stat. 338-18(d) is a law which demands information be released.

Okubo has not only failed to release the index data, she’s told various citizens that state law prohibits the release of “any information” regarding vital records to the general public.

The OIP must address this continuing wrongful statement. They are the authority charged with official review of Okubo’s activities with regard to the UIPA. Although the OIP has been much more forthright than the DoH, the OIP is now called upon to exercise its statutory purpose under the UIPA manual, which states at page 7:

The Hawaii State Legislature enacted the Uniform Information Practices Act (Modified) (the “UIPA”) based upon this premise that a democracy vests the people with the ultimate decision making power and government exists only to aid the people in the exercise of that power.

State of Hawaii, take notice – the people will be exercising their power. The people will be made to understand their power under the UIPA. The people will receive all information due to them under the UIPA. And the people will prevail.

Model UIPA requests, model OIP appeals and model judicial appeals are being drafted.

The state of Hawaii must know that attempts at evasion will not be successful. You have laws. The laws were written to command government.

Government will be commanded.

The public – previously a sleeping giant – is now awake. The giant is big and powerful. The government will kneel before the giant as the government is not separate to the body of the giant – the government is simply an intellectual limb extending from the body of the giant.

That limb is not a separate entity.

The giant may have suffered a bit of mental illness in thinking that the government limb was an overlord. But the giant is smiling in the mirror now as it recognizes – perhaps for the first time – that the limb is part of the giant’s anatomy.

The giant will command the DoH to issue all information due to the giant under the appropriate laws. The UIPA is such a law. As an attorney, I am very impressed with the UIPA. It’s easy to read, understand, implement and draft appeals under. Whoever drafted it was very skilled. They did the public giant justice. The UIPA was written to protect the eyes of the giant.

DoH Communications Director Okubo has placed her thumb directly in the eye of the giant. She never got the memo – “Giant is awake”.

Her thumb will be removed from the giant’s eye.

Leo C. Donofrio, Citizen Attorney, September 25, 2009.


.........................................................................................

TerriK INVESTIGATION – PART 1: Hawaii Department of Health Directors Fukino and Okubo Are Guilty of Misdirection.

TerriK INVESTIGATION – PART 1: Hawaii Department of Health Directors Fukino and Okubo Are Guilty of MisdirectionLeo Donofrio

Leo Explains how hawaiian officals are hiding information about the fraud obama
..........................................................................................

At every turn one can imagine and every point of order obama hides his true identity. The first day obama was in office he sealed all his records.
..........................................................................................
Barack Obama implemented and signed into law Executive Order 13489 and Hides His Identity

On January 21st, 2009, his very first day in office, Barack Obama implemented and signed into law Executive Order 13489.

section 2 applies:

Notice Of Intent To Disclose Presidential Records
When the Archivist provides notice to the incumbent and former Presidents of his intent to disclose Presidential records pursuant to section 1270.46 of the NARA regulations, the Archivist, using any guidelines providied by the incumbent and former Presidents, shall identify any specific materials, the disclosure of which he believes may raise a substantial question of executive privilege.”

That the first order of business Obama took care of on day one of his Presidency was to sign off on an Executive Order that states that only the records he chooses to be made public will be released? This is the subject that was at the absolute top of his agenda?

Note this obama executive order seals all his records past and present.

This is why Hawaii has sealed his birth certificate. Hawaii was following obama’s executive order to not disclose any of his records because he may want to declare executive privilege to have them sealed. All the colleges, Occidental College, Columbia University and any other records including even his kindergarten records are subject to his own executive order COVERUP. Obama knew he must seal all his records the first day in office because he is a FRAUD.

This posting in this blog about obama sealing all his records on his first day in office proves beyond any doubt obama is a FRAUD.

Obama Executive Order 13489 Conceals His True Identity A FRAUD
.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................

Because obama has used the power of an executive order his first day in office to conceal his true identity as a FRAUD it will be very difficult to expose him through the courts as he will claim executive privilege concerning anything to do with his birth certificate or any of his records. ONLY A FRAUD would hide his birth record and his college records etc.

My hope is some kind of certified record will be published on the net without obama being able to stop the publishing of some fact that will expose him as a FRAUD. The long form birth certificate or some other evidence that he is not a US citizen, naturalized citizen, foreign citizen or something proving beyond any doubt he is a FRAUD. If this does not happen soon obama will have a stranglehold on America that will as hitler did stop any attempt to remove him from office.

Obama where is your birth certificate? Why do you hide all your records through executive order 13489? It is because you are a FRAUD!
Story Reports

Ask Obama A Question That Is Not Pre Screened

Thursday, September 24, 2009

New York Magazine links WND to murder!





.........................................................................................
Nancy says you be the judge. Ok Ms Pelosi I will. I say you have caused people to be aware of the danger you present to America. Ms Pelosi you are responsible for inciting resentment in ordinary Americans against you and other left wing radicals in the congress. You have accused ordinary Americans who condemn your liberal lies as, people who incite violence. You incite violence by grouping Americans in town hall meetings as people who "carry swastikas". You have accused Americans who disagree with obama as nazis who carry swastikas. Your tactic is well known. It is accuse others of what you do yourself. You later talk of your fear of violence. Violence from ordinary Americans who protest you and obama. Ms Pelosi you are a traitor to America. You encite violence by your own words and deeds. You are a "dometic terrorist" in my opinion. You Ms Pelosi are not like most Americans who believe in freedom. You are part of a group in congress that wants complete control of America no matter what the cost. Ms Pelosi we know who and what you are. Your lies will only expose you more for what you are, a traitor to America.

A fact of history

If we look at American history, between 1942 and 1947, the data that was collected by the census bureau was handed over to the FBI and other organizations, at the request of President Roosevelt, and that’s how the Japanese were rounded up and put into the internment camps. I’m not saying that’s what the administration is planning to do. But I am saying that private, personal information that was given to the census bureau in the 1940s was used against Americans to round them up.

.........................................................................................

WASHINGTON – New York Magazine today implicated WND in the murder of a Census worker in Kentucky.

The article also linked Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage and Rep. Michele Bachmann with the crime.

The four are suspected of creating an anti-government climate that led directly to the attack.


I agree there is an anti-government climate. Ms Pelosi, Obama, Congress and the "state controlled media" have created the "climate change". After creating the climate these four government entities then blame and accuse others of what they have caused.

Hell Yes peole are mad, upset, confused and frustrated. Why? Because of ms Pelosi, Obama, Congress and the state controlled mass media.

The environment the "government and company" have created will possibly lead to violence. If it does only "government and company" are to blane as Ms pelosi and her fellow conspirators continue to fan the flames of political protests. Ms peolosi wants to blame Americans who protest her and obama's polices as radicals. Peolosi and Obama are extreme radicals who want to encite the American people to violence. This is exactly what hitler did. Accuse others of what he did. A fact. Obama is a liar. Pelosi is a liar.

Judge David O. Carter: DENYING REQUEST TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Judge David O. Carter: DENYING REQUEST TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
.........................................................................................
Investigating Obama
...........................................................................................
KEYES v OBAMA - 70 - MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: DENYING REQUEST TO FILE SECOND ...
.....................................................................................
Orly taitz tells a lie on her blog Sep 24 09 www.orlytaitzesq.com

quote: "Yesterday judge Carter has issued a chambers order, where he stated that there will not be enough time to review the second amended complaint before the October 5th hearing."

Nowhere does it say this in the chambers order. Orly is a liar! The proof is here.
.....................................................................................
Orly Taitz Watch - More Destruction of Her Own Cases
.........................................................................................

Judge David Carter ruled that the latest filing of Orly Taitz in Barnett, et.al., v. Obama may not be supplemented, as Tatiz had apparently intended, without the permission of the defense (the Department of Justice, oddly enough). This was their response to Obama's motion to dismiss, lauded by some for its eloquence as it rambled far beyond the points of the dismissal motion. When the right hand flourishes, watch what the left hand does.

This means that while the response of Orly Tatiz, DDS is apparently incomplete, it must stand. The umpteenth harmful error by Taitz? Merely a set of errors, or worse?

..........................................................................................

I can't believe Orly Taitz didn't know you can only amend a pleading once with out the concent of the opposing party. She should have known this. This to me is something that any competent attorney would know. I have been very suspect of Mrs Taitz lately because of her "errors" in court proceedings. She does deep six her own cases. It seems she also, is a FRAUD!. (Story Reports)

The strange thing is she gets to the point where her cases are almost heard then because she screws up the paper work the cases are dismissed. To me this is an excellent way to keep the issue of who obama really is out of court. Allen Keys recently pulled out of the latest case because I think he too knows something is fishy. Orly is fishy. Its similar to what obama does. He tells America things are getting better. A lie. Orly files lawsuits but they go nowhere many times because she deep sixes them before they can be heard. Its time to call a spade a spade. I'm calling orly taitz a spade!

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

The UN Climate Change (Global Warming) Numbers Hoax

"President Barack Obama’s speech on global warming to the United Nations was based on fantasy. Here are some quotes from the speech followed by the reality."

Obama’s climate fantasies

By Myron Ebell

President Barack Obama’s speech on global warming to the United Nations yesterday was based on fantasy. Here are some quotes from the speech followed by the reality.

Obama “…[T]he threat from climate change is serious, it is urgent, and it is growing.”

Reality Global mean temperatures increased slightly from 1977 to 2000. Temperatures have been flat since then.

Obama “Rising sea levels threaten every coastline.”

Reality Sea levels have been rising on and off since the end of the last ice age 13,000 years ago. The rate of sea level rise has not increased in recent decades over the 19th and 20th century average.

Obama “More powerful storms and floods threaten every continent.”

Reality There is no upward global trend in storms or floods.

Obama “More frequent drought and crop failures breed hunger and conflict in places where hunger and conflict already thrive.”

Reality There is no upward global trend in major droughts. Reversals in large-scale cycles have meant that the southward march of the Sahara Desert into the Sahel has been reversed in recent years and the Sahara is now shrinking.

Obama “On shrinking islands, families are already being forced to flee their homes as climate refugees.”

Reality Some Pacific islanders may want to emigrate to New Zealand or Australia and are claiming that their islands are disappearing as the reason, but shrinkage has been minimal in recent decades because sea level rise has been minimal.

President Obama’s policy prescriptions are energy rationing and energy poverty disguised as growth and prosperity. The emissions reductions that he promises the United States will make through cap-and-trade legislation are dead in the water in the U. S. Senate and would not survive a second vote in the U. S. House. If enacted, cap-and-trade would consign the economy to perpetual stagnation and make the U. S. into a second-rate economic power.

His policy prescription for poor countries is to promise them massive “financial and technical assistance”. The track record of paying off poor countries is that it has lined the pockets of corrupt leaders and bureaucracies with billions and tens of billions of dollars, but has done nothing to help those countries become prosperous. What these countries need is free markets and abolishing barriers to trade. The global warming policies advocated by the Obama Administration and the Democratic-controlled Congress would raise trade barriers and foster energy poverty throughout the world. Energy rationing is not the way forward and is not a message of hope for the poorest people in the world, who lack access to electricity and modern transportation.




........................................................................................
The UN "climate change" propaganda is fake as is obama

Climate Science International


The UN Climate Change (Global Warming) Numbers Hoax

.........................................................................................
In total, only 62 scientists reviewed the chapter in which this statement appears, the critical chapter 9, “Understanding and Attributing Climate Change”. Of the comments received from the 62 reviewers of this critical chapter, almost 60% of them were rejected by IPCC editors. And of the 62 expert reviewers of this chapter, 55 had serious vested interest, leaving only seven expert reviewers who appear impartial. A UN con game that obama uses to further his agenda exposed.

The WG I statement as “Typical IPCC doubletalk” asserting “The text of the IPCC report shows that this is decided by a guess from persons with a conflict of interest, not from a tested model. (This report reveals without question the UN scam of "climate change ie global warming" Its all faked numbers in a fake report from the fake UN)

The claim that 2,500 independent scientist reviewers agreed with this, the most important statement of the UN climate reports released this year, or any other statement in the UN climate reports, is nonsense.
.........................................................................................

By Tom Harris: John McLean Friday, December 14, 2007

Al Gore, Climate ChangeIt’s an assertion repeated by politicians and climate campaigners the world over – ‘2,500 scientists of the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) agree that humans are causing a climate crisis’.

But it’s not true. And, for the first time ever, the public can now see the extent to which they have been misled. As lies go, it’s a whopper. Here’s the real situation.

Like the three IPCC ‘assessment reports’ before it, the Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) released during 2007 (upon which the UN climate conference in Bali was based) includes the reports of the IPCC’s three working groups. Working Group I (WG I) is assigned to report on the extent and possible causes of past climate change as well as future ‘projections’. Its report is titled “The Physical Science Basis”. The reports from working groups II and II are titled “Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability” and “Mitigation of Climate Change” respectively, and since these are based on the results of WG I, it is crucially important that the WG I report stands up to close scrutiny.

There is, of course serious debate among scientists about the actual technical content of the roughly 1,000-page WG I report, especially its politically motivated Summary for Policymakers which is often the only part read by politicians and non-scientists. The technical content can be difficult for non-scientists to follow and so most people simply assume that if that large numbers of scientists agree, they must be right.

Consensus never proves the truth of a scientific claim, but is somehow widely believed to do so for the IPCC reports, so we need to ask how many scientists really did agree with the most important IPCC conclusion, namely that humans are causing significant climate change—in other words the key parts of WG I?

The numbers of scientist reviewers involved in WG I is actually less than a quarter of the whole, a little over 600 in total. The other 1,900 reviewers assessed the other working group reports. They had nothing to say about the causes of climate change or its future trajectory. Still, 600 “scientific expert reviewers” sounds pretty impressive. After all, they submitted their comments to the IPCC editors who assure us that “all substantive government and expert review comments received appropriate consideration.” And since these experts reviewers are all listed in Annex III of the report, they must have endorsed it, right?

Wrong.

For the first time ever, the UN has released on the Web the comments of reviewers who assessed the drafts of the WG I report and the IPCC editors’ responses. This release was almost certainly a result of intense pressure applied by “hockey-stick” co-debunker Steve McIntyre of Toronto and his allies. Unlike the other IPCC working groups, WG I is based in the U.S. and McIntyre had used the robust Freedom of Information legislation to request certain details when the full comments were released.

An examination of reviewers’ comments on the last draft of the WG I report before final report assembly (i.e. the ‘Second Order Revision’ or SOR) completely debunks the illusion of hundreds of experts diligently poring over all the chapters of the report and providing extensive feedback to the editing teams. Here’s the reality.

A total of 308 reviewers commented on the SOR, but only 32 reviewers commented on more than three chapters and only five reviewers commented on all 11 chapters of the report. Only about half the reviewers commented more than one chapter. It is logical that reviewers would generally limit their comments to their areas of expertise but it’s a far cry from the idea of thousands of scientists agreeing to anything.

Compounding this is the fact that IPCC editors could, and often did, ignore reviewers’ comments. Some editor responses were banal and others showed inconsistencies with other comments. Reviewers had to justify their requested changes but the responding editors appear to have been under no such obligation. Reviewers were sometimes flatly told they were wrong but no reasons or reliable references were provided. In other cases reviewers tried to dilute the certainty being expressed and they often provided supporting evidence, but their comments were often flatly rejected. Some comments were rejected on the basis of a lack of space – an incredible assertion in such an important document. The attitude of the editors seemed to be that simple corrections were accepted, requests for improved clarity tolerated but the assertions and interpretations that appear in the text were to be defended against any challenge.

An example of rampant misrepresentation of IPCC reports is the frequent assertion that ‘hundreds of IPCC scientists’ are known to support the following statement, arguably the most important of the WG I report, namely “Greenhouse gas forcing has very likely caused most of the observed global warming over the last 50 years.”

In total, only 62 scientists reviewed the chapter in which this statement appears, the critical chapter 9, “Understanding and Attributing Climate Change”. Of the comments received from the 62 reviewers of this critical chapter, almost 60% of them were rejected by IPCC editors. And of the 62 expert reviewers of this chapter, 55 had serious vested interest, leaving only seven expert reviewers who appear impartial.

Two of these seven were contacted by NRSP for the purposes of this article - Dr. Vincent Gray of New Zealand and Dr. Ross McKitrick of the University of Guelph, Canada. Concerning the “Greenhouse gas forcing …” statement above, Professor McKitrick explained “A categorical summary statement like this is not supported by the evidence in the IPCC WG I report. Evidence shown in the report suggests that other factors play a major role in climate change, and the specific effects expected from greenhouse gases have not been observed.”

Dr. Gray labeled the WG I statement as “Typical IPCC doubletalk” asserting “The text of the IPCC report shows that this is decided by a guess from persons with a conflict of interest, not from a tested model.”

Determining the level of support expressed by reviewers’ comments is subjective but a slightly generous evaluation indicates that just five reviewers endorsed the crucial ninth chapter. Four had vested interests and the other made only a single comment for the entire 11-chapter report. The claim that 2,500 independent scientist reviewers agreed with this, the most important statement of the UN climate reports released this year, or any other statement in the UN climate reports, is nonsense.

“The IPCC owe it to the world to explain who among their expert reviewers actually agree with their conclusions and who don’t,” says Natural Resources Stewardship Project Chair climatologist Dr. Timothy Ball. “Otherwise, their credibility, and the public’s trust of science in general, will be even further eroded.”

That the IPCC have let this deception continue for so long is a disgrace. Secretary General Ban Kai-Moon must instruct the UN climate body to either completely revise their operating procedures, welcoming dissenting input from scientist reviewers and indicating if reviewers have vested interests, or close the agency down completely. Until then, their conclusions, and any reached at the Bali conference based on IPCC conclusions, should be ignored entirely as politically skewed and dishonest.

John McLean is climate data analyst based in Melbourne, Australia. Tom Harris is the Ottawa-based Executive Director of the Natural Resources Stewardship Project (nrsp.com).

Obama the FRAUD and IMPOSTER leads freak show











.........................................................................................
Watch That Teleprompter BO
.........................................................................................



Haloween FREAK SHOW starring obama or aka barry soetoro the FRAUD. "'I'm the answer.' It's one of the most narcissistic approaches to American leadership I've ever seen in American political rhetoric." Bush Speechwriter on Obama UN Speech: ‘Narcissistic’ Approach to Governance.

..........................................................................................

Barack Obama’s mom was a communist
Barack Obama’s grandparents were communists
Barack Obama’s mentors (introduced by grandpa) were communists
Barack Obama attended a Marxist Black Liberation Theology church for 20 years
Barack Obama is friends with countless communists ie Bill Ayres (wrote Obama’s books)
Barack Obama’s Czars are full of communists ie Van Jones, Cass Sunstein
Barack Obama hates America as we know it and is trying to bankrupt US.
Why do Castro and Chavez love Obama? Wake up America.


.........................................................................................

Obama is a fraud and imposter.

(1) He has produced no documentation proving he is a US citizen. The only "document" he has produced for America is a jpeg on his web site fight the smears, that he said was a certification of live birth.
(2)When the electorial votes were counted in the joint session in 2008 dick cheney did not call for any objections as required by us statute.
That means he is not legally certified as the president.
(3)Obama sealed all his personal records the first day he was in office.
Obama admitted he was a citizen of kenya at birth making him a dual citizen at birth. This means he was not a natural born citizen because he was a dual citizen at birth by his own admission.
(4)The DNC sent no certification to all 50 states certifying he was certified to be a candidate. The dnc certification sent to the states was missing the original certification generated by the dnc after the convention.

Can anyone expalin to me why obama is not a fraud?

The Shakedown Of America By Using The Diversity Scam

The Shakedown Of America By Using The Diversity Scam

Hey Bo or Barry, how about some "diversity" in your assessment of yourself. All we hear is its all about helping you. What about America? What about telling the truth? All we hear from you are a DIVERSITY OF LIES!

Scam artists like obama

............................................................................................

Shakedown street: The real goal of philanthropy diversity

First, I'd like to show how ubiquitous this devotion to "diversity" has become. "Multiracial Propaganda"

Wal-mart (http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb100/SE14/walmart.jpg)
Target (http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb100/SE14/target.jpg)
Sears (http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb100/SE14/sears.jpg)
Radio Shack (http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb100/SE14/radioshack.jpg)
Nike (http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb100/SE14/nike.jpg)
Honeywell (http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb100/SE14/honeywell.jpg)
Home Depot (http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb100/SE14/homedepot.jpg)
Fry's (http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb100/SE14/frys.jpg)
Boeing (http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb100/SE14/boeing.jpg)

Skimming through them, you may see such phrases as "diversity is fundamental to success", "diversity is an integral part of our culture", and "diversity is a business imperative". Now, what do they mean by "diversity"? If one were to go by the imagery alone, "diversity", to them, means racial diversity. Does this racial mix celebrate contributions from White people? Well, check out the Nike link! Let's see, they have: The Native American Employee Network, Latino Employee Network; Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender and friends Employee Network; Disabled Employee Network, Asia Pacific Employee Network, and last but certainly not least, the African American Employee Network.

You may notice there is no "White/European/Western Employee Network". One would be inclined to believe that Nike's commitment to "diversity" is rather a commitment to hiring from the above ethno-sexual groups over White, heterosexual males whenever possible. You may say: "Well, that's just Nike. Not all companies are like that." In the case of corporate "diversity", you may have an argument; however, consider this: American universities have this same fixation on diversity and all of the same ethno-sexual groups are represented in student associations with the same absence of a "White/European/Western" one.

Now, I am convinced that these shrines to diversity serve another purpose: they are a defense to discrimination lawsuits that are inevitable in America. That is, in a discrimination case, they could point to their "diversity" shrine.

Of course, if "diversity" is only used to protect the bottom line, it would not explain why our politicians so often laud "diversity". They do it to put a happy, smiley face over globalizing European derived nations. These European derived nations take in masses of foreigners under many pretenses from humanitarian resettlements to legal and illegal immigration. Generally, the natives do not like this; so, in order to prevent blowback, they push the magically wonderful effects of "diversity" and multiculturalism.

The results of this mass migration, and acquiescence to "diversity", is the complete capitulation of the hosts (White people) in all respects, though above all: financial, cultural, and racial. I'd add also that this is a one way street: people flow from the third world to the West only.

Is it intentional? Is this planned or just a side effect? One can only speculate. Therefore, it would be more appropriate of me to say something along the lines of "Diversity hurts White people" instead of "Diversity is a scam against White people".

..........................................................................................

Shakedown street: The real goal of philanthropy diversity bill pushed by Assembly Dems

Heather R. Higgins of the Philanthropy Roundtable puts the spotlight on the latest shakedown effort by the diversity industry:

A bill purporting to encourage diversity among nonprofits has passed the California Assembly and faces a key vote in the state senate in early June. While little attention has been paid to this bill, it poses an enormous threat to private philanthropy in this country.

The Foundation Diversity and Transparency Act requires California foundations with $250 million in assets to report the composition by ethnicity and gender orientation of their boards and staffs, the boards and staffs of the charities they support, and the degree to which they are run by or support certain minorities.

The bill has been rightly criticized for its potentially crippling costs: fewer funds and greater bureaucratic burdens for the thousands of charities served by charitable foundations. Worse is the attempt to institute quotas through the back door. A group dedicated, say, to protecting sea otters, will begin to worry about the future of its grants if its staff isn't sufficiently ethnically diverse, or if its non-minority-interest-serving cause is now less favored. Meanwhile, the Latina executive director of a community organization might wonder if putting a white woman or gay Alaskan Native on her board is a good idea to keep happy the diversity-counters at the foundations that support her organization.

The Greenlining Institute, a racial-justice advocacy group that is a strong sponsor of the bill, asserts that only "20% of foundation funding from the state's 50 largest foundations is going to 'minority serving' causes," an "embarrassingly low" number. Come again? In the first place, many foundations specialize in altogether different causes. Moreover, the phrase "minority-serving" deliberately obscures such everyone-serving causes as hospitals, medical research, homeless shelters, educational initiatives, substance-abuse treatment and environmental improvement activities. But even a charity that feeds or educates minority kids is not considered minority serving - unless the organization is itself 50%-plus minority staffed and minority controlled. ...

The bill creates the opportunity for grandstanding, public relations shakedowns, and litigation. Already, foundations that have questioned this legislation have been publicly attacked. The executive director of Greenlining recently stated that "most of our money comes from lawsuits."

The "diversity" bill, if enacted into law, would be just the beginning. Already contemplated is legislation to cover all foundations, and all grant recipients, not just in California, but nationally; and to broaden reporting requirements to include the aged or the disabled. Ultimately, this all leads in one direction: to politically determine how private charities manage and deploy their resources.

I am sure Arnold will veto this should it get through the Senate, as he has so many similar bills. But contemplate a California with a Democratic governor who was either so weak he had to go along with the Legislature's far-left power plays (Gray Davis) or who was also a social-justice-by-any-means-necessary sort. It's scary.
Posted by Chris Reed at May 30, 2008 11:04 AM

Cash for Clunkers vouchers processed by idiots




The Cash for Clunkers vouchers are processed by idiots hired by the government with No prior work history, NO ability to type, NO test any kind, and NO background check.

You won't believe what happens inside Cash for Clunkers operation. Imagine what the obama "white house" really looks like. Obama the THUG handing out money to his operatives if they help turn America into ONE BIG CLUNKER JUNKYARD! Fred sanford could "run" the "cash for clunkers" program better than obama the FRAUD!

...........................................................................................
Undercover celeb Kathleen Willey exposes Obama fiasco
.............................................................................................
By Chelsea Schilling

While President Obama delivers speeches praising the alleged success of Cash for Clunkers, a former rebate processor for the federal program – also working undercover for WND – is calling it "complete chaos."

After the federal "Cash for Clunkers" program ended Aug. 24, the Department of Transportation reported that nearly 700,000 clunkers were taken off the roads and replaced by more fuel-efficient vehicles. Rebate applications worth $2.877 billion were submitted by the 8 p.m. deadline. The Transportation Department hired federal employees and private contract workers to process the rebates vouchers so car dealers would be compensated.

Former White House
aide Kathleen Willey was hired as an employee with Vangent Incorporated, a company that provides information technology management and business process outsourcing services to the public and private sectors. Its clients include federal agencies such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the U.S. Departments of Defense, Education, Health and Human Services, Justice and Labor and the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

But what her employer did not know was that Willey, the author of the book, "Target: Caught In the Crosshairs of Bill and Hillary Clinton," was also taking notes on all she observed and experienced for WND.

Kathleen Willey helped send President Clinton to the White House in 1992. Little did she imagine how the Clintons would repay her. Get Willey's explosive hit, "Target: Caught in the Crosshairs of Bill and Hillary Clinton," at WND's Superstore!

Vangent, based in Arlington, Va., secured a contract from the Department of Transportation in late August and earlier this month to handle 300,000 applications – or nearly half of all Cash for Clunkers vouchers.Vangent Vice President Eileen Rivera told WND the company hired at least 4,000 temporary employees in Chester, Va., Tampa, Fla., and London, Ky.

No work history needed

Willey processed the Cash for Clunkers vouchers at her position in Chester, Va. She attended a job fair on Aug. 31 and was hired through Astyra Corp., a minority-owned staffing company.

"We were told that we would be working on the Cash for Clunkers programming, examining all of the documents that the government
had received from dealers all over the country," Willey told WND.

She said many of the applicants had never even heard of the Cash for Clunkers program.

"We were not asked for any prior work history," Willey said. "The job description was listed as data entry and called for the ability to type 30 words per minute. There were no job requirements actually listed on the application."

The form requested direct deposit information, signature on a confidentiality agreement and background check, tax information and two forms of identification.

Willey said, "Some people did not have two forms, and I heard one recruiter say, 'We will work with you on that.'"


Kathleen Willey

She asked a woman who interviewed her what she would need to do before beginning her new position.

"When I asked if I needed to take any kind of test, the answer was, 'No,'" Willey said. "She told me to report for work the next day at 4:30 p.m. When I asked if I had to pass a background check before I started, she said, 'No.'"

However, Rivera said, "That's absolutely not true. Every single temporary employee who was hired went through a background check. If the background check did not clear, then they were released. They were not allowed to work on this program."

Barefoot and foul-mouthed employees

Willey said she was the only non-minority applicant in the room. While human resources required a strict dress code for the position, she said she was shocked by the clothing and conduct of other candidates who were interviewed:

I was the only one dressed for a job interview. Everyone else had on jeans and T-shirts. Most women wore flip-flops. One woman was barefoot. The women were dressed extremely unprofessionally, in jeans and very revealing tops. A lot of them wore T-shirts that barely covered their stomachs. What I noticed most were the foul mouths of everyone around me.

The next day, Willey reported that as many as 300 new employees attended orientation for new positions with Vangent.

"One of the first things we were told was that Cash for Clunkers will help the environment," she said.

One supervisor told the group, "The president has passed a good bill to do something good for the American people, but this program is a 'moving target.' Rules are changed daily."

A Department of Transportation webinar instructor repeated the statement about the program being a "moving target."

"He was obviously with the administration because he told us that the Cash for Clunkers program was a huge success for the country as well as the environment," Willey said. "He told us that we are dealing with 'three times the business in one-third of the time.' He also told us repeatedly that we were going to have to 'get out of our comfort zones' and be flexible.'"

She said she knew of only two professional trainers who had been brought in by the Department of Trainsportation to train everyone – supervisors, managers and employees. The supervisors and managers frequently contradicted one another and talked to the employees as if they were "in the first grade." The recruits were told they would soon receive photo identification badges.

A paycheck to do 'absolutely nothing'

The following day, on Sept. 2, employees waited outside from 4:30 p.m. until 6 p.m. to get into the building.

"Once inside, we waited another 30 minutes to sign in 'so we would get paid,' Willey recalled. "I noted that it was written on the piece of paper that our work day started at 4:30. We then waited in line at the 'badge table' to get our badges. When I got there, I had no badge. I finally got to my desk at about 6:45 p.m., where I sat with nothing to do until 10 p.m."

The employees waited for their user IDs and passwords to access the Car Allowance Rebate System, or CARS. Meanwhile, they were being paid $14.71 an hour "to do absolutely nothing," Willey said.

"There was not a supervisor to be found," she said. "Because I was bored to death, I read a newspaper and a book."

At 10 p.m., more than five hours after signing in, she said the employees were still being paid to remain idle. Willey and another employee went to find a supervisor.

"When we finally found one, we told her we wanted our user IDs and passwords so we could get to work, but she was too busy ordering out," she said. "At 10:20 p.m., we finally tracked down someone who had a list of our user IDs and passwords. I tried to get in and was ultimately locked out of the system. At 11:30 p.m., I found another supervisor and told her my problem. She told us she would look into it, but we couldn't find her again. We were told to go home at midnight, but that we should put 12:30 a.m. on our timesheets."

Rivera told WND, "It's very likely that she went through four or five hours of training. There was about two or three hours of onboarding to make sure that they were familiar with what they were about to be doing. A lot of employees all had to be trained at the same time, and there were different waves of that process that were going on."

Willey stopped by the security room to request her badge before leaving. A woman told her the badges were ready but that she could not have hers yet.

"I told her that we were told that we would have to wait another hour and a half the next day to get in, and I asked if she would reconsider giving them to us," Willey recalled. "She told me, 'No, because there were four bags of them,' and she didn't want to go through the bags. I asked if we could look ourselves or help her look because we wanted to get into the building to start working, but she again said, 'No.' When I asked why, she said, 'No.'"

More trouble with federal CARS system

On Sept. 3, Willey said she waited almost two hours to get into the building and collect her badge.

"Once again, I was unable to sign in to CARS," she reported. "My desk was filthy. On my way to the bathroom to get paper towels to clean my desk, I went in search of a supervisor to ask for help with signing in. When I finally found one, he told me that he couldn't help me and I should go to the other side and look for help. I finally found one who took my name and said he would check on it and that he would be back."

Willey went to the restroom to gather paper towels to clean her desk. When she arrived, she said she was shocked at the condition of the facility.

"I found overflowing toilets and vomit all over the floor," she said.

At 9:15 p.m., Willey was still waiting for help to access the CARS system.

"Despite all of my efforts to find help, I found myself sitting at my desk with absolutely nothing to do," she said. "Most everyone around me seemed to have no problem with that. I finally started reading my newspaper while I waited."

Suddenly, she said, a supervisor appeared and admonished her for reading at her desk.

"When I tried to explain to her that there was no work and that I had nothing to do but stare at a blank screen, she ordered me to put my paper away," Willey said. "When I asked her if she would help me get into the system, she told me she could not. I folded my newspaper and put it on my desk. She reappeared and yelled at me to remove it from the top of my desk, saying that newspapers, books, etc., are not allowed on your desk."

Another supervisor appeared to help the employees with the computer problem.

"I finally got in, but was immediately locked out again," she said. "She was gone and could never be found again. My friend and I finally figured out by ourselves how to get in and stay in."

Once in the CARS system, employees were told to send an e-mail requesting assignments. Willey waited for work until 11:50 p.m., when she approved her first transaction. She ended the shift and left work only 50 minutes later.

Free money!

During a 37.5-hour work week, Willey reported actually working only 14 hours – but she was paid for more than 37 hours of work.

"Two of those nights, I had no work at all," she said. "On those two evenings, when I left, I complained to two different supervisors and I got two different responses: 'Milk it, baby!' and 'Free money!'"

However, Rivera told WND, "A 37.5-hour work week was typical, but it is very unlikely that anyone was sitting around with nothing to do because there was so much work to do."

Willey continued, "After our 10:30 p.m. break, it was party time. Not a lot of people worked between 10:45 p.m. and 12:30 a.m. I will say, that there were some hard workers there, but they were all older women and a few older men."

Willey, a Level 2 reviewer who examined Cash for Clunkers vouchers after they had been checked once by a Level 1 reviewer, said the vouchers were being returned to "irate" dealers as many as seven times.

She said the vouchers are "rife with idiotic mistakes by Level 1 reviewers who are rejecting them for no reason at all, mostly because they are not paying attention."

"I am amazed at the number of vouchers that have been rejected in the last six weeks," Willey said. "Many have been rejected and returned to dealers three to seven times! And for no good reason. What is happening here is that the Level 1 examiners are so inept and lazy that, rather than take the time to closely examine and review these vouchers the way that they should, they just hit the reject or approve button without a second thought. That, of course, slows down the whole process and the dealers aren't getting paid by the Department of Transportation. The dealers are frustrated and irate, and make no bones about it when they return their documents that are correct and don't need to be revised. When their documents are returned for revision, they have no number to call or person to e-mail."

Willey told WND that auto dealers were often very good about submitting the eight documents required to receive a rebate, but some vouchers were being sent back because Level 1 examiners failed to hit the "next" button to go to the following page of documents.

She said, "I saw that time and time again. Then the dealers would write back and say, 'It's on Page 2.'"

Willey said a single voucher would be passed around to as many as a dozen workers without being processed.

"I'd get something, and I would see that it had gone around to people in our office in Chester six or seven times and nobody had worked on it," she said. "It was obvious that maybe someone would look at it and say, 'This is too complicated. I'm going to back out of it.' Then they would back out of it and someone else would do the same."


This is a picture of the future of the obama change. Obama is a communist traitor who does not have the ability to make government programs work. The idiots hire idiots who don't work. In the mean time America is being destroyed from within by obama and his zars.

If I traded my old suv in for the "cash for clunkers program" I would have had to present a title. A valid title. My car has a valid title. Obama has no "valid title". Obama wouldn't qualify to be "traded in" and become a natioanlized US citizen. His clunker does not quality! He would be rejected because of a "no record". This is exactly what obama is a NO RECORD!

Monday, September 21, 2009

Leo Donofrio Talks BIGFOOT about BIGEARS


.........................................................................................
Fake certification of birth is as worthless as the fake picture of "bigfoot"
.........................................................................................

Leo Donofrio is now interested in the birth certificate… so that we can finally prove Obama was born in Hawaii and stop the never ending circus surrounding BIGFOOT – an official long form birth certificate for President Obama.

To some, facts point to a cultural phenomenon, bigfoot, kept alive today through a combination of the misidentification of known animals, wishful thinking, and the deliberate fabrication of evidence.

Bigfoot Network

.............................................................................................
It would seem "bigfoot" and "obama" have some things in common. There is "evidence" bigfoot exists or has existed. There is evidence the long form original birth certificate of obama exists or has existed. "Bigfoot" hides in the shadows and evades capture. Obama hides the evidence of his birth in the shadow of a vault and evades exposure as a FRAUD! "Bigfoot" lets others do his talking for him. Obama lets others do his talking for him in the form of deception. Deception and evation are "Bigfoot's trademarks. Deception and evation are "food" and "water' to obama.Story Reports

..........................................................................................
Leo Donofrio Talks BIGFOOT
..........................................................................................
Let’s prove Obama Was Born In Hawaii So we Can Move Onto His British Birth.
...........................................................................................
Leo's Post:

Let this post be fair warning… Leo Donofrio is now interested in the birth certificate… so that we can finally prove Obama was born in Hawaii and stop the never ending circus surrounding BIGFOOT – an official long form birth certificate for President Obama.

The nation faces a crucial legal question:

How can a person who admits to having been born a British citizen – governed at birth by British law – be a natural born citizen of the United States?

This is a very serious legal question. Obama’s father was never a US citizen and was never permanently domiciled in the US. The leading Supreme Court decision in Wong Kim Ark indicates that the native born son of an alien is not natural born. There is no conspiracy theory attached to this question. Let’s state it another way:

Can a person who is at birth a dual citizen be considered a natural born citizen for purposes of meeting the Constitution’s requirements to be POTUS?

That is in no way a conspiracy theory. The US State department web site - now run by Obama – tells us that dual citizens owe allegiance to both nations and that while on the soil of the foreign nation that nation has a greater claim to the person than the US. It is certainly not trivial for US citizens to ask whether dual citizenship at birth means a person is not a “natural born citizen” of the US.

But as long as the never ending search for Bigfoot continues to obscure the real legal question, the true issue here will not only be attached to the conspiracy theory, it will be ridiculed as well.

Because of the conundrum, this blog will now also be concerned with an investigation into the vital records of President Obama as well as an intense focus upon the activities of the Hawaii Department of Health and the Hawaii Office of Information Practices. I hope to one day put these officials under oath and cross-examine them thoroughly.

I have always believed that Obama was born in Hawaii and I expect this investigation will reveal that he was. Upon proving that he was born in Hawaii, we may uncover details which indicate that Obama and Hawaii government officials purposely used the birth certificate issue to distract the nation from his British birth problems. If a smokescreen can be made clear, the nation will better comprehend the Constitutional blasphemy inherent in the 2008 POTUS election and the current White House resident.

Should our investigation prove that he wasn’t born in Hawaii, I will be very surprised, but I am certainly open to that conclusion.

I have written this post as a preview to some very interesting research – documents and letters issued by the State of Hawaii – which have not been made public yet. I will be making those public very soon as they are the product of researchers I am working with. Stay tuned. It’s going to get interesting.

On a lighter note -

$50,000 OFFER.

The following $50,000 offer was recently made by GregJackson.com:
$50,000 to anybody in the media who can answer this question about Obama…

The vast majority of the leftist mainstream and alternative “conservative” media have repeatedly called any American who has demanded that Barack Hussein Obama release his supposed Hawaiian birth certificate to prove he is a natural-born citizen, as is required under the United States Constitution, a fringe-kook-conspiracy-theorist-wing-nut.

So here is my question with $50,000 cash to anybody in the media who can answer the following 3 part question:

1. What hospital in Hawaii was Barack Hussein Obama born in?

2. Who was the attending physician who delivered BHO?

3. What time was BHO born?

Any 12 year-old signing up for Little League would have to provide this information on their BIRTH CERTIFICATE. Yet not one person in the entire media has been able to provide the answers to the very simple questions I have posed above.

..........................................................................................
Bigfoot and obama are mysteries. "Bigfoot" is a fraud that was conceived to deceive. Obama is a FRAUD that was conceived to deceive. The 'conspriracy theory' can't be solved because "bigfoot" does not exist. Obama is not a 'conspriracy theory'. The birth certificate issue can be solved. Obama can be exposed as a FRAUD. How? By revealing the real documents that support obama is not a US citizen. This includes his original birth certificate long form that has not been altered. The Certification of live birth obama points to as "evidence" he is a US citizen is equivalent to the "evidence" of bigfoot on the web, which is also a fake picture! Story Reports
..........................................................................................