Over 100 FREE Online Calculators

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Are you licensed to reload that ammo?

Get Your Reloading Kit Now before BO bans them along with guns and ammo

Are you licensed to reload that ammo?

Alarm raised over treaty provision to ban activity

By Bob Unruh

President Obama, who supported the handgun ban in Washington, D.C., before it was tossed by the Supreme Court, since his election has watched various proposals to ban "assault" weapons, require handgun owners to submit to mental health evaluations and sparked a rush on ammunition purchases that caused some retailers to name him their salesman of the year. Now he apparently is going after citzens who reload their ammunition.

It was during an official visit earlier this month to Mexico that he affirmed his support for a proposed international treaty that addresses "firearms trafficking."

B.A. Lawson
The treaty was adopted by President Clinton years ago but never ratified by the U.S. Senate, a goal Obama now has adopted.

The writer, B.A. Lawson, says, "If you reload your own ammo you may find yourself engaged in 'Illicit Manufacturing' of ammunition under an arms control treaty that President Obama started pushing last week in Mexico."

"Virtually everyone who supports the 2nd Amendment or has an interest in firearms has heard the numerous recent reports of ammunition shortages. The shortages have extended to reloading supplies that many folks rely on to keep their shooting costs down or to assemble exotic or hard to find ammunition. Many shooters have considered reloading their own ammo as insurance against limited supplies should legislation be enacted that would make ammo more scarce or dramatically more expensive," the blogger continued.

"Those thoughts may be in vain if the current administration is successful in getting the 'INTER-AMERICAN CONVENTION AGAINST THE ILLICIT MANUFACTURING OF AND TRAFFICKING IN FIREARMS, AMMUNITION, EXPLOSIVES, AND OTHER RELATED MATERIALS' treaty passed."

The treaty defines "illicit manufacturing" as "the manufacture or assembly of firearms, ammunition, explosives, and other related materials."

It then gives authority for that activity only with "a license from a competent governmental authority of the State Party where the manufacture or assembly takes place."

"The section … clearly identifies ammo reloaders that are not licensed by the government as 'Illicit Manufacturers' of ammunition. Now that we have reloaders properly labeled, lets move down to Article IV to see what we should do with them," the commentary said.

He then quotes Article IV, which states, "State Parties that have not yet done so shall adopt the necessary legislative or other measures to establish as criminal offenses under their domestic law the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, ammunition, explosives, and other related materials."

"This is pretty straightforward. If you reload ammunition without a license after the treaty is signed you will be a criminal," Lawson wrote.

The National Rifle Association said the treaty "does include language suggesting that it is not intended to restrict 'lawful ownership and use' of firearms. Despite those words, the NRA knows that anti-gun advocates will still try to use this treaty to attack gun ownership in the U.S."


Even accessories "which can be attached to a firearm" are targeted.

"It would presumably also ban home manufacture of these items without a government license. Do you own trigger jobs? Reload your own ammunition? Not any more, not without a government license!"

John Velleco, director of federal affairs for Gun Owners of America, notes the benefits for Obama of having such rules in treaties, not legislation.

"If ratified and the U.S. is found not to be in compliance with any provisions of the treaty – such as a provision that would outlaw reloading ammunition without a government license – President Obama would be empowered to implement regulations without congressional approval," he wrote.

"If the kind of 'change' that Obama wants is for the United States to take its marching orders from third world countries regarding our gun rights, we're in big trouble!"

resident Obama would be empowered to implement regulations without congressional approval!!!!

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Obama is like crack to some people

I've noticed obama is like crack to some people. No matter how much logic or real facts concerning the FRAUD obama are explained or drawn like a picture for some people they will not accept the truth but almost every time explain obama's lies or deception with another lie or most of the time an insult because obama supporters cannot refute or explain the FRAUD obama. They act like obama is crack to them and instead of selling their mother for crack they sell their freedom and liberty. Obama supporters are addicted and in denial about who obama is and what he is doing. They constantly make excuses for him because he is their human 'crack'. They must injest his lies and believe whatever he says or they will go into obama withdrawal and feel like they are not part of the great crowd of people the mass media talks about suppoting obama's every move. Obama supporters need to be detoxed which means first of all not listening to the mass news media and local news media that supports obama and does not question anything he says or does. They need to read,, etc and stay of the program until the bo leaves their system. Because bo mania is so toxic there are some withdrawal symptoms such as craving cnn and wanting to believe the obama propaganda. BO is just like crack to all who try it, just one hit and BO "crack" has made them slaves to believe whatever the dnc or the democrates tell them. BO crack is addictive to those who inhale his lies.

Sunday, April 19, 2009

Obama Forgery Exposed (Dr. Polarik Official Use)


Obama Certificate of live birth is a forgery

What is the definition of FORGERY?

The Black's Law, American College, and Random House dictionaries along with the court citations below define FORGERY as:

The making, drawing, or altering a document with the intent to defraud. A signature made without the person knowing of or consenting to it.

The law and the courts say:

The Modern Penal Code (MPC sec. 224.1) states that a person is guilty of forgery if:
a) a actor or person alters any writing of any person,
b) makes, completes, executes, authenticates, issues, or transfers any writing so that it purports to be an act of another who did not authorize the act or to have been at the time or place or in a numbered sequence other than was in fact the case, or to be a copy of an original when no such original existed; or
c) utters any writing which he knows to be forged.

"Forgery is a crime when it includes the representation of handwriting of another and the act of uttering as true and genuine any forged writing knowing the same to be forged with intent to prejudice, damage, and defraud any person."
State v. May 93 Idaho 343, 461 P. 2d 126, 129.

"Crime of forgery is committed when one makes or passes a false instrument with the intent to defraud, and the element of loss or detriment is immaterial."
People v. McAffey, 182 Cal. App.2d 486, 6 Cal. Rptr. 333,337

"The false making of an instrument, which purports on the face of it to be good and valid for purposes for which it was created, with design to defraud any person or persons."
State v. Goranson, 67 Wash.2d 456, 408 P.2d 7,9.

How do we prove a forgery?

Proving it involves reviewing the totality of the law regarding the facts in evidence. This includes the signatures, a competent analysis of the signatures and an understanding of the law as it applies to the case.

Obama is a FRAUD. His forgery is a crime. He should be impeached from office.

Radical Left Wing Extremists In Homeland Security

Radical Left Wing Extremists In Homeland Security. This report proves it.
Radical Left Wing Extremist Obama Administration gestapo tatics dhs-rightwing-extremism.pdf

(U//FOUO) Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment 7 April 2009

(U) Prepared by the Extremism and Radicalization Branch, Homeland Environment Threat Analysis Division. Coordinated with the FBI.

(U//FOUO) This product is one of a series of intelligence assessments published by the Extremism and Radicalization Branch to facilitate a greater understanding of the phenomenon of violent radicalization in the United States. The information is provided to federal, state, local, and tribal counterterrorism and law enforcement officials so they may effectively deter, prevent, preempt, or respond to terrorist attacks against the United States. Federal efforts to influence domestic public opinion must be conducted in an overt and transparent manner, clearly identifying United States Government sponsorship.


It is clear the real threat to US citizens is the US government Homeland Security Department! Radical Left Wing Extremists have Infiltrated "homeland Security" and US citizens are now considered "right wing Extremists" if they only question Obama's policies! America has been subverted by Obama who is a Radical Left Wing Extremist that has place other radical left wing extremists in "homeland security" and through out the government. The biggest threat to Americans security is the Obama administration and his fellow comrades who are subverting our freedoms everyday!


A left-wing extremist exhibits many of the following attributes:

--believes the United States is a fundamentally negative force in the world.

--believes that American imperialism is the primary cause of Islamic radicalism.

--believes that the decision to go to war in Iraq was not an individual case of monumental stupidity, but a consequence of America's fundamental imperialistic nature.

--tends to blame America for the failures of others, i.e. the failure of our NATO allies to fulfill their responsibilities in Afghanistan.

--doesn't believe that capitalism, carefully regulated and progressively taxed, is the best liberal idea in human history.

--believes American society is fundamentally unfair (as opposed to having unfair aspects that need improvement).

--believes that eternal problems like crime and poverty are the primarily the fault of society.

--believes that America isn't a democracy. (It is a republic)

--believes that corporations are fundamentally evil.

--believes in a corporate conspiracy that controls the world.

--is intolerant of good ideas when they come from conservative sources.

--dismissively mocks people of faith, especially those who are opposed to abortion and gay marriage.

--regularly uses harsh, vulgar, intolerant language to attack moderates or conservatives.

--Believes and defends anything and everything Obama says or does.

[This is just a partial list. If you know of other attributes of left wing radical extremists just leave a comment.]

"This report appears to raise significant issues involving the privacy and civil liberties of many Americans – including war veterans," Thompson told Napolitano in a letter.

Freedom of association and freedom of speech are guaranteed to all Americans, no matter what a person's beliefs are, whatever their political orientation is 'extremist' or not.

The report appears at best sloppy and unprofessional and at worst a representation of political bias being passed off as intelligence analysis by DHS.

This report appears to raise significant issues involving the privacy and civil liberties of many Americans – including war veterans.

Why call Americans 'extremists'?

The Thomas More Law Center of Ann Arbor, Mich., says it has filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the Department of Homeland Security demanding why it calls Americans who oppose abortion, support 2nd Amendment gun rights and dislike lax immigration law enforcement "extremists."

"This is not an intelligence report but a diatribe against those who oppose the policies of the Obama administration," said Richard Thompson, president and chief counsel for the organization.

"It is a declaration of war against the American people and our constitution. It is a prelude to extreme gun control legislation and hate speech laws targeting Christian churches and others who oppose abortion and same sex marriage," he continued. "The federal government should be focusing its attention on the 35 radical Muslim compounds in the U.S. training its followers on how to kidnap and kill Americans."


Bipartisan team stunned by 'extremism' allegations 'Veterans, families should not be viewed as a threat'


The report purports to analyze 'rightwing extremism' without defining the term or specifying by name a single group that falls into this category. According to the imprecise analysis contained in the report, 'rightwing extremists' could include groups dedicated to opposing abortion or illegal immigration as well as those who may not agree with the new administration's 'perceived' stance on several issues including illegal immigration and restrictions on firearm ownership.

On their face, these statements may appear to cast legitimate viewpoints – in fact some viewpoints that recently constituted administration policy – in a suspicious light. Without any specific reporting to support such vague statements it is easy to see how they are offensive to many people.

It is a declaration of war against the American people and our constitution. It is a prelude to extreme gun control legislation and hate speech laws targeting Christian churches and others who oppose abortion and same sex marriage

[I agree it is a declaration of war against the American People and our constitution. So I suggest Americans who love freedom and are willing to fight and die for it get ready for the comming revolution.]

According to the federal government, characteristics of members of the suspect group, 'Right wing radical extremists, include those who:

* Oppose restrictions on firearms

* Oppose lax immigration

* Oppose the policies of President Obama regarding immigration, citizenship and the expansion of social programs [Just opposing obama makes you a radical!]

* Oppose continuation of free trade agreements

* Oppose same-sex marriage

* Has paraonia of foreign regimes

* Fear Communist regimes [obama administration]

* Oppose one world government

* Bemoan the decline of U.S. stature in the world

* Is upset with the loss of U.S. manufacturing jobs to China and India

The NRA Opposes restrictions on firearms. According to the federal government I am a 'right wing radical extremist'

I'll admit I oppose all the above and I also will declare obama is a LEFT WING RADICAL EXTREMIST COMMUNIST TRAITOR.