............................................................................................
The Question
............................................................................................
At 9:00 PM EDT (3:00 PM in Hawaii), TerriK sent the following email to Okubo:
From [TerriK - real name redacted]
Date: July 27, 2009 9:00:29 PM EDT
To: “Okubo, Janice S.”
Subject: Re: Your help is appreciated
Ms. Okubo,
Aloha! Thank you so much for replying quickly. And, thank you for the ‘infamous’ press release–it is a document I refer to every so often and having my very own is much appreciated. I’ll consider this document my brush with fame AND infamy! Frankly, I wonder what you must think of the ‘Birther’ inquiries and would like to state upfront, that I completely respect Hawaii’s Privacy laws. I ask that you answer the following, if privacy laws allow:
“Is the Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, able to state they have verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has President Barack Obama’s AMENDED original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.”
I fear my carefully chosen wording appears like an effort to ‘pull a fast one’–however, I modeled it on the following statement you were able to make publicly on your press release last year :
“Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures. “
I hope this is reasonable to ask. If not, can you point me to the applicable statute?
Many thanks for your attention to this matter.
........................................................................................
The Answer
........................................................................................
From: “Okubo, Janice S.”
Date: July 27, 2009 11:45:54 PM EDT
To: [TerriK - real name redacted]
Subject: RE: Your help is appreciated.
Attached is the statement issued today by the Hawaii State Director of Health. The director has never used the term “AMMENDED” (sic) in any of her issued statements regarding this issue. Attached to this email was the actual press release issued by DoH Director Fukino on July 27th.
TerriK was completely shocked at the incredible dual statements laid before her on official DoH letterhead:
“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawai‛i State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai‘i State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai‘i and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago.”
.........................................................................................
Looking back retrospectively, TerriK’s questions submitted to Okubo early in the morning on July 27th appear to have been the catalyst for the notorious press release later that evening.
Was this a knee jerk reaction to a line of questioning which – if explored in light of the UIPA – had the potential to force the release of President Obama’s vital records?
However, I do feel very confident that the laws in Hawaii – UIPA, Haw. Rev. Stat. 338-18(d), OIP opinion letters and case law – will force the release of vital records and all other information consulted for the public statements made by DoH Director Fukino.
Comprehensive legal analysis of those laws will be posted in Part 3 of the TerriK Investigation Report.
by Leo C. Donofrio, Citizen Attorney http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com
..........................................................................................
Oh ya, I agree Leo this was a knee jerk reaction because TerriK was really on to something. An offer that Okubo, Janice S could not refuse, legally. Okubo took the bait. The rats got real excited and crapped. When the rats crapped out a response stating the natural born American citizen stuff they were in panic mode. I think "they" still are. This avenue of revealing the facts about the imposter obama is better than anything else that has been tried. I know the federal courts will not order obama to release information about who he is. Leo is right Okubo sooner or later will be forced to issue some information that will crack the obama nutshell. I hope it is real soon before the imposter obama destroys America.
Obama must manipulate officals in Hawaii to keep his identity hidden. Okubo has let the "cat" out of the bag when she said obama is a natural-born American citizen. The Hawaiian UIPA will expose the imposter obama. They know the UIPA is not going away. the UIPA is a game changer. Leo Donofrio
.........................................................................................
A question for Leo, and answer from Leo.
.........................................................................................
Question:
September 29, 2009 at 6:14 pm
“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawai‛i State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai‘i State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai‘i and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago.”
Dr Fukino is saying the following in this statement:
She has seen the hospital name where obama was born in Hawaii?
She has seen the doctor’s name?
She has seen the parents names?
She verifies obama is a natural born citizen on what basis?
What is Dr fukino’s definition of a “natural-born American citizen”
It can’t be on the basis of two parents that were born in America.
It must be on the basis of where obama was born only.
Natural Born Citizen – this is an individual born of two American parents, whether the parents were native born or were foreign born and then naturalized.
There were seven presidents born that had at least one foreign parent like Obama. But in every case, the foreign parent was naturalized, with the exception of Chester Arthur. His father was Irish and became a Canadian citizen, never a naturalized US citizen.
Obama is not a Natural Born Citizen due to to his Kenyan father.
[ed. technically, his father was a native of Kenya but a British citizen as was Obama at birth and this is what makes him ineligible in my opinion.]
Correct me Leo if this is not right.
I think I got an snwer for this question. What is Dr fukino’s definition of a “natural-born American citizen”. It must be on the basis of where obama was born only.
Natural Born Citizen – this is an individual born of two American parents, whether the parents were native born or were foreign born and then naturalized.
I do believe this is the definition of a "natural born citizen". One of his "parents" was a not native born nor a naturalized citizen. He was a British citizen at obama's "birth".
AS LEO SAYS THIS MEANS OBAMA WAS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN AT BIRTH. AT the minimum on the face of scant evidence he was just a "citizen" at birth, NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN AT BIRTH!.
........................................................................................
Some additional possibilities. Leo Donofrio Quotes.
........................................................................................
I have previously read – in the Lame Cherry Blog – an argument that Obama’s mother was a British subject by virtue of simply marrying Obama Sr. That article does not discuss the act of registering as a UKC citizen under Section 6(2) of the BNA 1948. The Lame Cherry article only discusses the possibility of Stanley Ann Obama being a British subject.
The author of that blog concludes that Stanley Ann Obama was both a British subject and a citizen of the US.
It is possible due to some provision of British law that Stanley Ann Obama was considered a British subject after marrying Barack Obama, Sr.
It’s important to note whether Stanley Ann Obama, by availing herself of the registered citizen provisions of the BNA 1948, there is so much we don't know about Obama's history - so much we are not allowed to know. The 60's were a time of great change. Stanley Ann was a very 'unique' woman of the time. It's very possible she was not happy being a US citizen. Perhaps she meant to give up her US citizenship. (When she 'married obama sr')
There is so much we don't know about Obama's history - so much we are not allowed to know. The 60's were a time of great change. Stanley Ann was a very unique woman of the time. It's very possible she was not happy being a US citizen. Perhaps she gave meant to give up her US citizenship.
.........................................................................................
If obama's "mother" Stanley Ann Obama, by availing herself of the registered citizen provisions of the BNA 1948, became a UKC citizen and concurrently lost US citizenship THIS MEANS OBAMA WAS BORN TO TWO FOREIGN PARENTS!
.........................................................................................
An additional question to ponder about obama's "mother".
.........................................................................................
Michelle Obama Contradicts Barack’s Biography
TexasDarlin Blog ^
Posted on 07/11/2008 9:20:02 AM PDT by WilliamReading
Michelle Obama contradicted the embedded story-line of her husband’s biography Thursday, as reported by The Huffington Post:
His own mother, she said at the beginning of her remarks, was “very young and very single when she had him.”
Oops, Michelle forgot the script.
But she confirmed my suspicions that Barack’s parents were NOT married when he was born, and were not even together.
And that makes Stanley Ann Dunham’s Aug. 61 trip to Mercer Island even more suspicious. Ann was not on her way to visit Barack Sr. at Harvard, as her friend told me. First of all, Barack Sr. didn’t go to Harvard until 1963. Secondly, they weren’t together then, as Michelle confirmed Thursday.
I can’t imagine that 18-year-old Ann would travel from Honolulu to Boston with a 3-week-old baby, ALONE, to visit the ex-boyfriend (baby Barack’s father). I can’t imagine her parents would let her.
Why was Stanley Ann Dunham on Mercer Island in Aug. 1961?
So according to obama's own wife obama's mother was single at the time of his birth. Another question to be answered. If this is true any "birth certificate" with obama's name on it is a FRADULENT DOCUMENT! Now this could be the REAL reason obama nor Hawaii will release any information about his "birth certificate". Story Reports
What we do know without a doubt obama was a dual citizen at birth. A british citizen and a US citizen according to his own words. This means out of his own mouth he has admitted he was not a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN at birth. Obama has admitted he is a FRAUD and IMPOSTER. What more evidence does anyone need? Story Reports
What would go some way to putting this important question to rest would be if the Vital Statistics Dept. of Hawaii would release the 'vault' copy of "Obama's" birth registration. It is proof of birth circumstances as exists, legally. Keep in mind it might indicate obama was born to dunham and obama sr but it is accurate only if the documents provided, if any, were accurate to obtain it. It is a real possiblilty obama's "parents" were not married when he was born. It is a real possiblity obama's "mother" was a British citizen at his birth. It is a real possibility obama's "mother" was not a US citizen long enough at birth if he was born in Kenya for him to be considered a naturalized dual citizen. It is a real possibility obama was born not in Hawaii but Kenya. It is a real possiblity obama is not a US citizen at all!
(So many possibilities in addition to the documented facts of obama's statements about his "birth". Like I said obama has admitted he is a dual citizen. He has admitted he is a FRAUD and IMPOSTER!)
No comments:
Post a Comment